JB/106/131/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/106/131/001: Difference between revisions

Kdownunder (talk | contribs)
m Protected "JB/106/131/001": ready for review ([Edit=Allow only administrators] (indefinite) [Move=Allow only administrators] (indefinite))
Kdownunder (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 2: Line 2:
'''[{{fullurl:JB/106/131/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
'''[{{fullurl:JB/106/131/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
 
<p><!-- pencil -->7 March 1807<lb/>
<note>Judicial Insti<gap/><lb/>
<head>Judicial Justice</head><lb/>
Letter V<lb/>
<!-- pencil -->10</p>
1. Shapes<lb/>\1. Misdecision<lb/>
<p>In the above cases the <del>error</del> error in which the misdecision<lb/>
20<lb/>
consists, is or may be <del>the</del> <add>in favour of</add> one side only:  <del>for in</del><lb/>
<gap/>decision <del>fro</del><lb/>
purely and simply in disfavour of the other side.</p>
may be <hi rend="underline"><gap/></hi><lb/>
<p>But misdecision is capable of being compound and<lb/>
as above, or <hi rend="underline">reciprocal</hi></note>
reciprocal. It then consists of two errors one in favour<lb/>
 
of one side, the other in favour of the other:  each error<lb/>
 
therefore to the extent of the least of the two, if they are unequal<lb/>
 
operating in compensation of the other:  as if Blackacre<lb/>
be adjudged to the Plaintiff instead of Whiteacre. Here,<lb/>
considered in a logical point of view, the error is always<lb/>
double <add>which is considered</add>:  but in a pathological point of view it may<lb/>
be no error at all:  <del><gap/></del> <add>such</add> is actually the case of the value<lb/>
if Blackacre and Whiteacre be <del><gap/></del> to both parties exactly<lb/>
the same.</p>
<p>The <hi rend="underline">logical</hi> point of view is the <add>only</add> point in which a<lb/>
subject of this sort is considered <add>contemplated</add> willingly by the English lawyer <add>Judge</add>.<lb/>
To the idea of <hi rend="underline">error</hi> is <add>are</add> associated <add>in his mind</add> the practice of <hi rend="underline">nullification</hi>,<lb/>
and the receipt of fees.  One makes the error,<lb/>
another or the same receives the fees for it.</p>
<p>The <hi rend="underline">pathological</hi> point of view is that in which, <hi rend="underline">pro<lb/>
<del><gap/></del> virili</hi>, he avoids seeing it:  fees depend upon <add>are produced by</add> the absence<lb/>
of feeling, <add>as well as by the absence of reason,</add> and it is convenient to him to have <add>no feeling</add> none<lb/>
himself, <add>as well as to do</add> and to act by others as if they had none.</p>
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{In_Progress}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Ready_For_Review}}

Revision as of 02:43, 18 December 2021

Click Here To Edit

7 March 1807
Judicial Justice
10

In the above cases the error error in which the misdecision
consists, is or may be the in favour of one side only: for in
purely and simply in disfavour of the other side.

But misdecision is capable of being compound and
reciprocal. It then consists of two errors one in favour
of one side, the other in favour of the other: each error
therefore to the extent of the least of the two, if they are unequal
operating in compensation of the other: as if Blackacre
be adjudged to the Plaintiff instead of Whiteacre. Here,
considered in a logical point of view, the error is always
double which is considered: but in a pathological point of view it may
be no error at all: such is actually the case of the value
if Blackacre and Whiteacre be to both parties exactly
the same.

The logical point of view is the only point in which a
subject of this sort is considered contemplated willingly by the English lawyer Judge.
To the idea of error is are associated in his mind the practice of nullification,
and the receipt of fees. One makes the error,
another or the same receives the fees for it.

The pathological point of view is that in which, pro
virili
, he avoids seeing it: fees depend upon are produced by the absence
of feeling, as well as by the absence of reason, and it is convenient to him to have no feeling none
himself, as well as to do and to act by others as if they had none.


Identifier: | JB/106/131/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 106.

Date_1

1807-03-07

Marginal Summary Numbering

20-21

Box

106

Main Headings

scotch reform

Folio number

131

Info in main headings field

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

e10

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

iping 1804

Marginals

jeremy bentham

Paper Producer

bernardino rivadavia

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

1804

Notes public

ID Number

34719

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in