JB/116/272/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/116/272/001: Difference between revisions

BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Kdownunder (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
'''[{{fullurl:JB/116/272/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
'''[{{fullurl:JB/116/272/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
 
<p><head>IIII &sect;. Incapacitation.<lb/>
21-Jan-2017: under construction by Diane FolanPlease do not amend. Proofreading in progress...
I This the sole real end .</head></p>
 
<p>1<lb/>
<head>II Incapacitation}<lb/><!-- in pencil -->
Incapacitation by<lb/>
Marg. Contents}<!-- closing brackets from line 1 and 2 are adjoined (above and beneath), all in pencil --> <!-- white space, to the date, which is positioned at the mid-point between lines 1 and 2 --> 7 Aug. 1802<!-- all in pencil and line 1 left-aligned to the left-hand margin (line 2 is right-aligned by the closing brackets) --></head>
<add>mere</add> distance , without<lb/>
 
reformation , seems<lb/>
<head>IIII <del>2</del>3. Incapacitation.</head>
to have been the<lb/>
<head>I .  This the sole real end .</head>
only real object<lb/>
<!-- horizontal line, in pencil -->
in this choice.</p>
<p><lb/>
2<lb/>Misbehaviour , the<lb/>
result of n<hi rend='underline'>on-reformation</hi>,<lb/>
not being<lb/>
regarded, so as it<lb/>
was out of Britain<lb/>
and unseen.</p>
<p>3<lb/>
The contrivance was<lb/>
in every instance<lb/>
either unjust or<lb/>
inefficacious.</p>
<p><head>II Injustices of the design</head></p>
<p>4<lb/>
1. Injustice of the<lb/>
expedient<lb/>
<p>Historical sketch –<lb/>
Since the <del>reformation</del> <add>restoration</add><lb/>
transportation to<lb/>
the American Colonies<lb/>
has been<lb/>
coming into use;<lb/>
and has been<lb/>
marked out, in<lb/>
lots of different<lb/>
lengths , with great<lb/>
apparent care.</p>
<p>5.<lb/>
The Penitentiary<lb/>
Act of 1779 affords<lb/>
an <del>particular</del> <add>eminent</add> example<lb/>
of this care.</p>
<p>6.<lb/>
To America , transportation<lb/>
had partly<lb/>
fulfilled the objects<lb/>
of punishment,<lb/>
partly failed.</p>
<p>7<lb/>
Reformation being<lb/>
difficult, and incapacitation<lb/>
by local<lb/>
exclusion appearing<lb/>
easy , when a fresh<lb/>
spot was to be looked<lb/>
out for , N.S. Wales<lb/>
recommended itself<lb/>
on the score of<lb/>
<hi rend='underline'>distance</hi>.</p>
<pb/>
<pb/>
 
<p><head>IIII. &sect;. Incapacitation<lb/>
<p>Incapacitation by
II.  Injustice</head></p>
<lb/>
<p>8<lb/>
<add>mere</add> distance , without
<hi rend="underline">Distance</hi> was the<lb/>
<lb/>
only circumstance<lb/>
reformation , seems
that could have<lb/>
<lb/>
recommended it.</p>
to have been the  
<p>9<lb/>
<lb/>
In idea, the expedient <lb/>
only real object
was a simple <lb/>
<lb/>
one.</p>
in this choice . &#x2014;
<p>10.<lb/>
<lb/></p>
But its effects on<lb/>
 
the system of transportation<lb/>
<head>2.</head><!-- centred -->
punishment , as laid down <lb/>
<p>Misbehaviour , the
by so many <del>Acts</del> <add>laws ,</add><lb/>
<lb/>
were extremely complicated.</p>
result of n<hi rend='underline'>on-reformation</hi> ,
<p>11<lb/>
<lb/>
In an oblique way<lb/>
not being
which will be delineated<lb/>
<lb/>
presently –<lb/>
regarded , so as it
the punishment<lb/>
<lb/>
in almost all cases<lb/>
was out of Britain
of transportation<lb/>
<lb/>
underwent an<lb/>
and unseen. &#x2014;
<hi rend='underline'>increase</hi>, prodigious<lb/>
<lb/></p>
and <hi rend='underline'>unprecedented</hi>.</p>
 
<p>12.<lb/>
<head>3.</head><!-- centred -->
In the almost <lb/>
<p>The contrivance was
obsolete practise <lb/>
<lb/>
with regard to <lb/>
in every instance
<hi rend='underline'>mayhem</hi> , damages <lb/>
<lb/>
found by the Jury<lb/>
either unjust or
may be <hi rend='underline'>encreased</hi><lb/>
<lb/>
by the Judge - but <lb/>
inefficacious . &#x2014;
the benefit goes <lb/>
<lb/></p>
to the party injured.</p>
 
<p>13.<lb/>
<!-- horizontal line, in pencil -->
In the case of <hi rend='underline'>pardon</hi>,<lb/>
 
or <del>actual</del> <add>execution</add> rigour is<lb/>
<head>II Injustices of the design</head>
made to fall <hi rend='underline'>short</hi><lb/>
<head><unclear>4 -</unclear></head>
of that of the law<lb/>
<p>1. Injustice of the
- in no <del>other</del> case to<lb/>
<lb/>
stretch <hi rend='underline'>beyond</hi> the<lb/>
expedient-
law, as here.</p>
<lb/></p>
<p>14.<lb/>
 
It is no justification<lb/>
<p><!-- indented -->Historical sketch &#x2014;
to say the <hi rend='underline'>right</hi><lb/>
<lb/>
of return remains –<lb/>
since the <del>reformation</del> <add>restoration&#x2014;</add>  
since the physical<lb/>
<lb/>
power is taken or<lb/>
transportation to
meant to be taken<lb/>
<lb/>
away more effectually<lb/>
the American Colonies
<del>than</del> by <add>than it could be , were</add> taking away<lb/>
<lb/>
the right.</p>
has been
<lb/>
coming into use;
<lb/>
and has been
<lb/>
marked out , in
<lb/>
lots of different
<lb/>
lengths , with great
<lb/>
apparent care &#x2014;
<lb/></p>
 
<head>5 -</head><!-- centred -->
<p>The Penitentiary
<lb/>
Act of 179 affords
<lb/>
an <del>particular</del> <add>eminent</add> example
<lb/>
of this care &#x2014;
<lb/></p>
 
<head>6 - .</head><!-- centred -->
<p>To America , transportation
<lb/>
had partly
<lb/>
fulfilled the objects
<lb/>
of punishment ,
<lb/>
partly failed . &#x2014;
<lb/></p>
 
<head>7 -</head><!-- centred -->
<p>Reformation being
<lb/>
difficult , and incapacitation
<lb/>
by local
<lb/>
exclusion appearing
<lb/>
easy , when a fresh
<lb/>
spot was to be looked
<lb/>
out for , N.S. Wales
<lb/>
recommended itself
<lb/>
on the score of
<lb/>
<hi rend='underline'>distance</hi> .
<lb/></p>
 
<pb/>
<pb/>
 
<p><head>III &sect; Incapacitation.<lb/>
<head>IIII. <add>3</add> Incapacitation .</head>
IIInjustice</head></p>
<head>II. Injustice</head>
<p>15.<lb/>
<head>8 -</head>
The existing law<lb/>
<!-- horizontal line, in pencil -->
of transportation<lb/>
<p><!-- indented --><hi rend='underline'>Distanc</hi>e was the
<hi rend='underline'>is</hi> as much broke<lb/>
<lb/>
in upon, as the<lb/>
only circumstance
law against murder <lb/>
<lb/>
would be, by<lb/>
that could have
throwing a man<lb/>
<lb/>
into a dungeon,<lb/>
recommended it . &#x2014;
and leaving him<lb/>
<lb/></p>
to starve.</p>
 
<p>16.<lb/>
<head>9 -</head><!-- centred -->
The mode of producing<lb/>
<p>In idea , the expedient
the effect<lb/>
<lb/>
was particularly<lb/>
was a simple
objectionable as<lb/>
<lb/>
well as the effect<lb/>
one . &#x2014;
produced.<lb/>
<lb/></p>
The alteration <lb/>
 
would have been<lb/>
<head>10 .</head><!-- centred -->
<del><unclear>hard</unclear></del> <add>unjust</add>, though it had<lb/>
<p>But its effects on
been made <hi rend='underline'>regularly</hi><lb/>
<lb/>
by Parliament.</p>
the system of transportation
<p>17.<lb/>
<lb/>
But it was made<lb/>
punishment , as laid down
by a <hi rend='underline'>deceit</hi> on <add>put upon</add><lb/>
<lb/>
Parliament: powers<lb/>
by so many <del>Acts</del> <add>laws ,</add>
given, for the purpose<lb/>
<lb/>
of continuing<lb/>
were extremely complicated &#x2014;
transportation on its<lb/>
<lb></p>
former footing, being<lb/>
 
applied to the putting<lb/>
<head>11 &#x2014;</head><!-- centred -->
it upon a quite<lb/>
<p>In an oblique way
different footing.</p>
<lb/>
<p>18.<lb/>
which will be delineated
Even in the Act<lb/>
<lb/>
of 1787 in which<lb/>
presently &#x2014;
N. S. Wales was<lb/>
<lb/>
mentioned, there<lb/>
the punishment
was another deceit<lb/>
<lb/>
on Parliament ,<lb/>
in almost all cases
which will be<lb/>
<lb/>
laid open <del>farther</del> <add>elsewhere</add><lb/>
of transportation
<del>on</del>.</p>
<lb/>
<p>19.<lb/>
underwent an
The punishments<lb/>
<lb/>
being still , by the<lb/>
<hi rend='underline'>increase</hi> , prodigious
<del><gap/></del> <add><hi rend="underline">tenor</hi></add> of the several<lb/>
<lb/>
laws, of <hi rend='underline'>different</hi><lb/>
and <hi rend='underline'>unprecendented</hi>.
lengths , while in<lb/>
<lb/></p>
<hi rend='underline'>effect</hi> they were to<lb/>
 
be all of <hi rend='underline'>one length</hi> –<lb/>
<head>12.</head><!-- centred -->
<add>viz perpetual </add> hence a continual<lb/>
<p>In the almost
(though unheeded)<lb/>
<lb/>
mockery of justice <lb/>
obsolete practise
on the part of Parliament<lb/>
<lb/>
as well <lb/>
with regard to
as Judges.</p>
<lb/>
<hi rend='underline'>mayhem</hi> , damages
<lb/>
found by the Jury
<lb/>
may be <hi rend='underline'><sic>encreased</sic></hi>
<lb/>
by the Judge - but
<lb/>
the benefit goes
<lb/>
to the party injured . &#x2014;
<lb/></p>
 
<head>13.</head><!-- centred -->
<p>In the case of <hi rend='underline'>pardon</hi> ,
<lb/>
or <del>actual</del> <add>execution</add> rigour is
<lb/>
made to fall <hi rend='underline'>short</hi>
<lb/>
of that of the law
<lb/>
- in no <del>other</del> case to
<lb/>
stretch <hi rend='underline'>beyond</hi> the
<lb/>
law , as here . &#x2014;
<lb/></p>
 
<head>14 &#x2014;</head><!-- centred -->
<p>It is no justification
<lb/>
to say the <hi rend='underline'>right</hi>
<lb/>
of return remains&#x2014;
<lb/>
since the physical
<lb/>
power is taken or
<lb/>
meant to be taken
<lb/>
away more effectually
<lb/>
<del>than</del> by <add>than it could be , were</add> taking away
<lb/>
the right . &#x2014;
<lb/></p>
 
<pb/>
 
<pb/>
 
<head>III <add>3</add> Incapacitation.</head>
<head>II.  Injustice</head>
<unclear><head>15 &#x2014;</head>
<!-- horizontal line, in pencil --></unclear><!-- horizontal line came first, then 15 - added.  Check markup of this when thinking clearer -->
<p>The existing law
<lb/>
of transportation
<lb/>
<hi rend='underline'>is</hi> as much broke
<lb/>
in upon , as the
<lb/>
law against murder  
<lb/>
would be , by
<lb/>
throwing a man
<lb/>
into a dungeon ,
<lb/>
and leaving him
<lb/>
to starve .
<lb/></p>
 
<head>16 -</head><!-- centred -->
<p><!-- indented -->The mode of producing
<lb/>
the effect
<lb/>
was particularly
<lb/>
objectionable as
<lb/>
well as the effect
<lb/>
produced &#x2014;
<lb/></p>
 
<p><!-- indented -->The alteration  
<lb/>
would have been
<lb/>
<gap/><!-- 'hard' ? --> <add>unjust ,</add> , though it had
<lb/>
been made <hi rend='underline'>regularly</hi>
<lb/>
by Parliament.
<lb/></p>
 
<head>17.</head><!-- centred -->
<p>But it was made
<lb/>
by a <hi rend='underline'>deceit</hi> on <add>put upon</add>
<lb/>
Parliament: powers
<lb/>
given , for the purpose
<lb/>
of continuing
<lb/>
transportation on its
<lb/>
former footing, being
<lb/>
applied to the putting
<lb/>
it upon a quiet
<lb/>
different footing&#x2014;.
<lb/></p>
 
<head>18 -</head><!-- centred -->
<p>Even in the Act
<lb/>
of 1787 in which
<lb/>
N. S. Wales was
<lb/>
mentioned , there
<lb/>
was another deceit
<lb/>
on Parliament ,
<lb/>
which will be
<lb/>
laid open <del>farther</del> <add>elsewhere</add>
<lb/>
<del>on</del> . &#x2014;
<lb/></p>
 
<head>19 -</head><!-- centred -->
<p>The punishments
<lb/>
being still , by the
<lb/>
<del><unclear><hi rend='underline'>latter</hi></unclear></del> <add>tenor</add> of the several
<lb/>
laws, of <hi rend='underline'>differen</hi>t
<lb/>
lengths , while in
<lb/>
<hi rend='underline'>effect</hi> they were to
<lb/>
be all of <hi rend='underline'>one length</hi> &#x2014;
<add>viz perpetual&#x2014;</add> hence a continual
<lb/>
(though unheeded)
<lb/>
mockery of justice &#x2014;
<lb/>
on the part of Parliament
<lb/>
as well  
<lb/>
as Judges&#x2014;
<lb/></p>
 
<pb/>
<pb/>


<head>7 Aug. 1802 <!-- white space --> {{III Incapacitation<lb/>
<head>7 Aug. 1802 <!-- white space --> {{III Incapacitation<lb/>
{{Marg. Contents<!-- all in pencil and right-aligned to the right-hand margin.  Again, the double opening brackets are adjoined on lines 1 and 2, with the date being written at the mid-point between the two lines. --></head>
{{Marg. Contents<!-- all in pencil and right-aligned to the right-hand margin.  Again, the double opening brackets are adjoined on lines 1 and 2, with the date being written at the mid-point between the two lines. --></head>
 
<p><head>IIII. &sect;. Incapacitation<lb/>
<head>IIII.<add>3</add> Incapacitation -</head>
III . Inefficacy</head></p>
<head>III . Inefficacy</head><!-- centred -->
<p>20.<lb/>
<!-- horizontal line, in pencil -->
With respect to Convicts<lb/>
<pb/>
already under sentence,<lb/>
<head>20 &#x2014;</head><!-- centred -->
the <del><unclear>inclusion</unclear></del> <add>extension</add> had all<lb/>
<p>With respect to Convicts
the iniquity of an <foreign><hi rend='underline'>ex<lb/>
<lb/>
post facto</hi></foreign> law.</p>
already under sentence ,
<p>21.<lb/>
<lb/>
Pernicious example set<lb/>
the <del><unclear>inclusion</unclear></del> <add>entension</add> had all
by this perfidy, <del><gap/></del> <add>on the</add><lb/>
<lb/>
part of Pitt, those <gap/>: - Indication<lb/>
the iniquity of an <!-- foreign text checked: https://www.google.co.uk/search?q=ex+post+facto+definition&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&aq=t&rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&client=firefox-a --><foreign><hi rend='underline'>ex
afforded by it<lb/>
<lb/>
of the perfidy exemplified<lb/>
post facto</hi></foreign> law. &#x2014;
afterwards in the<lb/>
<lb/></p>
<sic>dialougs</sic> <add>of the sum persons</add> in respect of<lb/>
 
Panopticon.</p>
<head>21&#x2014;</head><!-- centred -->
<p>22.<lb/>
<p>Pernicious example set
If but a month were<lb/>
 
to be added by direct<lb/>
by this perfidy, <del>Inddi</del> <add>on the part of Pitt , those <gap/>: - Indi</add>cation
order to hulk confinement<lb/>
<lb/>
here at home<lb/>
afforded by it
what a sensation , <del><gap/></del><lb/>
<lb/>
in the public mind.</p>
of the perfidy exemplified
<p>23.<lb/>
<lb/>
Though the <hi rend='underline'>bondage</hi> may<lb/>
afterwards in the
<del>not</del> <add>not have been</add> thus meant to be<lb/>
<lb/>
made perpetual - yet<lb/>
<sic>dialougs</sic> <add>of the sum persons</add> in respect of
the banishment was<lb/>
<lb/>
which is the only part<lb/>
Panopticon . &#x2014;
of the punishment<lb/>
<lb/></p>
expressly warranted by<lb/>
 
the law.</p>
<head>22 -</head><!-- centred -->
<p><head>III .  Inefficacy &#x2014;</head></p>
<p>If but a month were
<p>24.<lb/>
<lb/>
Though the banishment<lb/>
to be added by direct
was intended by the<lb/>
<lb/>
contrivers of the system<lb/>
order to hulk confinement
to be perpetual , the<lb/>
<lb/>
intention has succeeded<lb/>
here at home
but imperfectly. A<lb/>
<lb/>
considerable number<lb/>
what a sensation , <del><gap/></del>
return.</p>
<lb/>
<p>25.<lb/>
in the public mind .
worse corrupted by the<lb/>
<lb/></p>
discipline of N. S. Wales.</p>
 
<p>26.<lb/>
<head>23 -</head><!-- centred -->
While the <hi rend='underline'>injustice</hi><lb/>
<p>Though the <hi rend='underline'>bondage</hi> may
is <hi rend='underline'>compleat</hi> , the <hi rend='underline'>benefit</hi><lb/>
<del>not</del> <add>not have been</add> thus meant to be
expected from it is<lb/>
<lb/>
thereby <hi rend='underline'>incompleat</hi>.</p>
made perpetual - yet
<p></hi> 26 (a) Quotations<lb/>
<lb/>
1   No care taken as home for <lb/>
the banishment was
4 1/2 years to prevent unlawful<lb/>
<lb/>
returns care<lb/>
which is the only part
taken there to prevent<lb/>
<lb/>
<hi rend='underline'>lawful</hi> ones.<lb/>
of the punishment
2.  Release without permission<lb/>
<lb/>
<hi rend='underline'>easy</hi> return, not settlement,<lb/>
expressly warranted by
the general object.<lb/>
<lb/>
3.  Table of Returns from Collins.</p>
the law . &#x2014;
<lb/></p>
 
<!-- horizonal line, in pencil -->
 
<head>III .  Inefficacy &#x2014;</head><!-- left-aligned -->
<!-- horizontal line, in pencil -->
<head>24 &#x2014;</head>
<p>Though the banishment
<lb/>
was intended by the
<lb/>
contrivers of the system
<lb/>
to be perpetual , the
<lb/>
intention has succeeded
<lb/>
but imperfectly&#x2014; A
<lb/>
considerable number
<lb/>
return &#x2014;
<lb/></p>
 
<head>25 .</head><!-- centred -->
<p>&#x2014; worse corrupted by the
<lb/>
discipline of N. S. Wales&#x2014;
<lb/></p>
 
<head>26 &#x2014;</head><!-- centred -->
<p>While the <hi rend='underline'>injustice</hi>
<lb/>
is <sic>c<hi rend='underline'>ompleat</sic></hi> , the <hi rend='underline'>benefit</hi>
<lb/>
expected from it is
<lb/>
thereby <sic><hi rend='underline'>incompleat</hi></sic> -
<lb/></p>
 
<head>26 &#x2014; <hi rend='superscript'>(a)</hi> Quotations</head><!-- the number 2 starts at the centre of the column -->
<p>1 No <unclear>care</unclear><!-- or, 'case' --> taken as home for  
<lb/>
4 1/2 years to prevent unlawful
<lb/>
returns &#x2014; care
<lb/>
taken there to prevent
<lb/>
<hi rend='underline'>lawful</hi> ones &#x2014;
<lb/>
2.  Release without permission
<lb/>
<hi rend='underline'>easy</hi> return, not settlement ,
<lb/>
the general object &#x2014;
<lb/>
3.  <gap/><!-- 'Tab.' ? --> of Returns from Collins .
<lb/></p>
 
<pb/>
<pb/>



Revision as of 06:04, 18 December 2021

Click Here To Edit

IIII §. Incapacitation.
I . This the sole real end .

1
Incapacitation by
mere distance , without
reformation , seems
to have been the
only real object
in this choice.


2
Misbehaviour , the
result of non-reformation,
not being
regarded, so as it
was out of Britain
and unseen.

3
The contrivance was
in every instance
either unjust or
inefficacious.

II Injustices of the design

4
1. Injustice of the
expedient

Historical sketch –
Since the reformation restoration
transportation to
the American Colonies
has been
coming into use;
and has been
marked out, in
lots of different
lengths , with great
apparent care.

5.
The Penitentiary
Act of 1779 affords
an particular eminent example
of this care.

6.
To America , transportation
had partly
fulfilled the objects
of punishment,
partly failed.

7
Reformation being
difficult, and incapacitation
by local
exclusion appearing
easy , when a fresh
spot was to be looked
out for , N.S. Wales
recommended itself
on the score of
distance.


---page break---

IIII. §. Incapacitation
II. Injustice

8
Distance was the
only circumstance
that could have
recommended it.

9
In idea, the expedient
was a simple
one.

10.
But its effects on
the system of transportation
punishment , as laid down
by so many Acts laws ,
were extremely complicated.

11
In an oblique way
which will be delineated
presently –
the punishment
in almost all cases
of transportation
underwent an
increase, prodigious
and unprecedented.

12.
In the almost
obsolete practise
with regard to
mayhem , damages
found by the Jury
may be encreased
by the Judge - but
the benefit goes
to the party injured.

13.
In the case of pardon,
or actual execution rigour is
made to fall short
of that of the law
- in no other case to
stretch beyond the
law, as here.

14.
It is no justification
to say the right
of return remains –
since the physical
power is taken or
meant to be taken
away more effectually
than by than it could be , were taking away
the right.


---page break---

III § Incapacitation.
II. Injustice

15.
The existing law
of transportation
is as much broke
in upon, as the
law against murder
would be, by
throwing a man
into a dungeon,
and leaving him
to starve.

16.
The mode of producing
the effect
was particularly
objectionable as
well as the effect
produced.
The alteration
would have been
hard unjust, though it had
been made regularly
by Parliament.

17.
But it was made
by a deceit on put upon
Parliament: powers
given, for the purpose
of continuing
transportation on its
former footing, being
applied to the putting
it upon a quite
different footing.

18.
Even in the Act
of 1787 in which
N. S. Wales was
mentioned, there
was another deceit
on Parliament ,
which will be
laid open farther elsewhere
on.

19.
The punishments
being still , by the
tenor of the several
laws, of different
lengths , while in
effect they were to
be all of one length
viz perpetual – hence a continual
(though unheeded)
mockery of justice –
on the part of Parliament
as well
as Judges.


---page break---

7 Aug. 1802 {{III Incapacitation
{{Marg. Contents

IIII. §. Incapacitation
III . Inefficacy

20.
With respect to Convicts
already under sentence,
the inclusion extension had all
the iniquity of an ex
post facto
law.

21.
Pernicious example set
by this perfidy, on the
part of Pitt, those : - Indication
afforded by it
of the perfidy exemplified
afterwards in the
dialougs of the sum persons in respect of
Panopticon.

22.
If but a month were
to be added by direct
order to hulk confinement
here at home
what a sensation ,
in the public mind.

23.
Though the bondage may
not not have been thus meant to be
made perpetual - yet
the banishment was
which is the only part
of the punishment
expressly warranted by
the law.

III . Inefficacy —

24.
Though the banishment
was intended by the
contrivers of the system
to be perpetual , the
intention has succeeded
but imperfectly. A
considerable number
return.

25.
– worse corrupted by the
discipline of N. S. Wales.

26.
While the injustice
is compleat , the benefit
expected from it is
thereby incompleat.

</hi> 26 (a) Quotations
1 No care taken as home for
4 1/2 years to prevent unlawful
returns – care
taken there to prevent
lawful ones.
2. Release without permission
easy return, not settlement,
the general object.
3. Table of Returns from Collins.


---page break---


---page break---

IIII 3 Incapacitation - IV. Panopticon contra
---page break---

27-

The use of the place
and the security
afforded by it in
this respect grows
less and less — as
the Colony is in
other respects more
and more "improved".

27(a)

Though the employing
King's Ships exclusively
(ex.gr. the
Glatton) will diminish
the facility
it will not put
an end to it while
any private ships
are admitted . —

28-

It is to the most
pernicious and dangerous
characters ,
that escape and
return
to England
are is easiest —
1 - the opulent receiver —
2 - the enterprising
burglarer &c —


---page break---

IV. Panopticon contra 29.

Panopticon system —
During the penal
term its efficacy ,
under the head of
incapacitation , is
at itsa maximum .

30—

Thenceforward , instead
of incapacitation ,
its reliance is
upon reformation .

31—

Its extreme oppositeness
to N. S. Wales
in every point of
view on which reformation depends —
1. Absence of Drunkenness & Gaming &.c total.
2. Religious exercise
constant —
3 . After the term
of punishment ,
eligible employment
certain . — v. supra .


---page break---

IIII. 3 Incapacitation . V. Dernier resort , Inspection &c 32-

In case of a second
offence Panopticon for
life would incapacitate
for any third . —

V. V Dernier resort , Inspection 33.

In S.S. Wales , necessity
drove men to an
application , however
imperfect , of the Inspection
principle.

34-

The Governor there,
having more power
than Parliament
has here , built a
General Jail for
that island ; which
was what Parliament
attempted in vain
to do for this . the
D. of Portland , as per letter 14 Octr 1799 , its Acts

35.

In a society , thus
corrupted by the
original principle of
its institution , the
tutelary principle of
inspection was found
necessary to be applied
even to the Soldiery .


---page break---

VI. Surest resource , Death. 36—

Death , a particular
mode of incapacitation ,
in respect
of which the efficiency
of the N S. Wales
system was pre-eminent .
In the
voyage they were
more than decimated .

37—

The fault lay not
in the Contractors
but in Pitt & C<hi rend='underline'>o</hi>..
by their incapacity
& inhuman negligence —
their
bad management
making a bad
system worse —


---page break---

III.3Incapacitation. VI.Surest resource , Death. 38

Causes of the mortality —
1. Length of the Voyage—
2. Want of interest
on the part of the
part
of the Contractors
in the preservation
of the lives of the
Cargo . —

39 .

Neither of these causes
of mortality had
place even in the old
transportation system . —

40

In the Panopticon
system , the opposite
efficient causes of
security are at
the maximum .

41—

Struggles which it
cost the author to
preserve to this
article its place
in the Contract ;
notwithstanding
the consent given
to it in the Proposal. -



Identifier: | JB/116/272/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 116.

Date_1

1802-08-07

Marginal Summary Numbering

1-26, 26a, 27, 27a, 28-41

Box

116

Main Headings

panopticon versus new south wales

Folio number

272

Info in main headings field

iii incapacitation marg. contents

Image

001

Titles

Category

marginal summary sheet

Number of Pages

2

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

Penner

john herbert koe

Watermarks

Marginals

Paper Producer

Corrections

jeremy bentham

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

37805

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in