JB/118/038/002: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/118/038/002: Difference between revisions

Kdownunder (talk | contribs)
m Protected "JB/118/038/002": ready for review ([Edit=Allow only administrators] (indefinite) [Move=Allow only administrators] (indefinite))
Kdownunder (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 2: Line 2:
'''[{{fullurl:JB/118/038/002|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
'''[{{fullurl:JB/118/038/002|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
 
<p><!-- pencil --><head>To Dundas</head></p>
''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
<p>would I should <del>hope</del> <add>flatter myself</add> suffice.  As to the proportions,<lb/>
 
an equal distribution, or if <del>there be any</del> differences<lb/>
 
<add>be admitted,</add> a gradation of <foreign>douceur</foreign> in proportion to the<lb/>
gradations of <add>public</add> situation and fortune, might at<lb/>
first sight to the most obvious <del>one</del> <add><del>mode</del> plan.</add>  But if<lb/>
I might be permitted to advice, as the <del>degree of <add>force with</add><lb/>
which the nuisance is repelled</del> abhorrence testified to the nuisance<lb/>
<del><add><gap/></add> abhorrence testified to the nuisance</del> is, not in the<lb/>
<del><gap/></del> <add>inverse,</add> but in the <del>inverse</del> <add>direct</add> ratio of the <add><del>vicinity</del></add> distance<lb/>
so should the quantum of <foreign>douceur</foreign> applied to<lb/>
<del>conquer that abhorrence <add>surmount that force.</add></del> <add><del>consume</del> conquer that abhorrence.</add>  And as to <del>those</del> the<lb/>
persons who would be to have the nuisance under<lb/>
their very noses, as they are <add><del>unreasonable</del></add> whimsical enough<lb/>
to be fond of it, and are ready to declare themselves<lb/>
so, <add><del>since is to them it is no nuisance</del></add> as it is no nuisance to them they<lb/>
would have no pretension to <add><del>draw upon</del></add> diminish the fund<lb/>
created for the benefit of their nicer neighbours.  <hi rend="superscript">⊞</hi> <note><hi rend="superscript">⊞</hi> <add>But</add> I beg pardon for <del><gap/> the contemporary</del> <add>applying</add> so disrespectful an epithet as that of <hi rend="underline">whimsical</hi> to such of <del>individuals of the</del> the gentlemen as have the <add><del>undiscontented</del></add> misfortune to be <hi rend="underline">undiscontented</hi>, for, if I have not been misinformed, you Sir, according to your declarations <del>as regarding to your declarations</del> <add>would as well as M<hi rend="superscript">r</hi> Nepean</add> <del>would</del> have been <del>in their number</del> <add>of <del>this latter</del> the</add> undiscontented party and you been in their place.</note>  Convinced<lb/>
<add>that</add> under these circumstances, <del>that nothing but the want of</del> <add>had they been all present to your <unclear>record</unclear></add><lb/>
<del>having all the circumstances <gap/> the large percentage <gap/> <gap/> convinced<lb/> that nothing but the importance to of such of</del>
<add>nothing but the importance of such of</add> the gentlemen whom you can not <del><gap/></del> <add>avoid</add> seeing,<lb/>
and who have inevitable access to you in Parliament<lb/>
or elsewhere, could have prevailed upon you<lb/>
so much as to think of departing from an engagement<lb/>
so deliberately entered into and so repeatedly confirmed,<lb/>
or of allowing claims of exemption so deliberately<lb/>
and unanimously disallowed by the 12 Judges<lb/>
I can not I say help submitting to you, Sir, whether<lb/>
the gentlemen <add><del>with</del></add> by whom <del>a <gap/></del> <add>alone a complaint</add> against the dispensations<lb/>
of the law has been preferred <del>ought</del> <add>are</add> not <del>to be</del> the<lb/>
first <add><del>if any</del></add> from whom <add>if from any body</add> a claim for indemnification should be called for.</p>


<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Untranscribed}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Ready_For_Review}}

Revision as of 04:31, 23 December 2021

Click Here To Edit

To Dundas

would I should hope flatter myself suffice. As to the proportions,
an equal distribution, or if there be any differences
be admitted, a gradation of douceur in proportion to the
gradations of public situation and fortune, might at
first sight to the most obvious one mode plan. But if
I might be permitted to advice, as the degree of force with
which the nuisance is repelled
abhorrence testified to the nuisance
abhorrence testified to the nuisance is, not in the
inverse, but in the inverse direct ratio of the vicinity distance
so should the quantum of douceur applied to
conquer that abhorrence surmount that force. consume conquer that abhorrence. And as to those the
persons who would be to have the nuisance under
their very noses, as they are unreasonable whimsical enough
to be fond of it, and are ready to declare themselves
so, since is to them it is no nuisance as it is no nuisance to them they
would have no pretension to draw upon diminish the fund
created for the benefit of their nicer neighbours. But I beg pardon for the contemporary applying so disrespectful an epithet as that of whimsical to such of individuals of the the gentlemen as have the undiscontented misfortune to be undiscontented, for, if I have not been misinformed, you Sir, according to your declarations as regarding to your declarations would as well as Mr Nepean would have been in their number of this latter the undiscontented party and you been in their place. Convinced
that under these circumstances, that nothing but the want of had they been all present to your record
having all the circumstances the large percentage convinced
that nothing but the importance to of such of
nothing but the importance of such of the gentlemen whom you can not avoid seeing,
and who have inevitable access to you in Parliament
or elsewhere, could have prevailed upon you
so much as to think of departing from an engagement
so deliberately entered into and so repeatedly confirmed,
or of allowing claims of exemption so deliberately
and unanimously disallowed by the 12 Judges
I can not I say help submitting to you, Sir, whether
the gentlemen with by whom a alone a complaint against the dispensations
of the law has been preferred ought are not to be the
first if any from whom if from any body a claim for indemnification should be called for.



Identifier: | JB/118/038/002"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 118.

Date_1

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

118

Main Headings

panopticon

Folio number

038

Info in main headings field

to dundas

Image

002

Titles

Category

correspondence

Number of Pages

2

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

f21 / f22

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

Marginals

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

draft of letter 988, vol. 5

ID Number

39092

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in