JB/023/003/002: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/023/003/002: Difference between revisions

Kdownunder (talk | contribs)
m Protected "JB/023/003/002": ready for review ([Edit=Allow only administrators] (indefinite) [Move=Allow only administrators] (indefinite))
Kdownunder (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 2: Line 2:
'''[{{fullurl:JB/023/003/002|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
'''[{{fullurl:JB/023/003/002|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
 
<p><head><hi rend="underline">Constitutional Code.</hi></head></p>
''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
<p>1.  2<hi rend="superscript">d</hi> Ch<hi rend="superscript">r.</hi> Senate Delay<lb/>
 
U.S. Senate attributes<lb/>
 
purely mischievous – in<lb/>
 
respect of delay &amp; expense<lb/>
mischievous by the amount<lb/>
of those effects.</p>
<p>2.  2<hi rend="superscript">d</hi> Ch<hi rend="superscript">r.</hi> Senate Useless<lb/>
Benefit none.</p>
<p>3.  2<hi rend="superscript">d</hi> Ch<hi rend="superscript">r.</hi> Senate Data?<lb/>
For a debtor &amp; creditor<lb/>
account data wanting.<lb/>
Heads the following –<p>1.  2<hi rend="superscript">d</hi> Ch<hi rend="superscript">r.</hi> Senate Delay<lb/>
U.S. Senate attributes<lb/>
purely mischievous – in<lb/>
respect of delay &amp; expense<lb/>
mischievous by the amount<lb/>
of those effects.</p>
2<hi rend="superscript">d</hi>Ch<hi rend="superscript">r</hi> I. Delay<lb/>
1.  Acts come before the<lb/>
Senate List.<lb/>
2.  Acts rejected, List.<lb/>
3.  Acts passed<lb/>
1.  N<hi rend="superscript">o.</hi> of days in House<lb/>
of Representatives.<lb/>
2. d<hi rend="superscript">o.</hi> in Senate.</p>
<p>4.  2<hi rend="superscript">d</hi> Ch<hi rend="superscript">r.</hi> Senate Data?<lb/>
Heads in relation to<lb/>
which long acquaintance<lb/>
with proceedings necessary.<lb/>
1.  Bills rejected never<lb/>
brought forward again<lb/>
effects good &amp; bad.<lb/>
2.  So as to amendments<lb/>
made.</p>
<p>5.  2<hi rend="superscript">d</hi> Ch<hi rend="superscript">r.</hi> Senate Data?<lb/>
Objection will the profit<lb/>
of the inquiry be adequate<lb/>
to the trouble.</p>
<p>6.  2<hi rend="superscript">d</hi> Ch<hi rend="superscript">r.</hi> Senate Data?<lb/>
Answer yes the inquiry<lb/>
indispensable because<lb/>
delay &amp; expense<lb/>
of Senate are evils<lb/>
sensible &amp; incontrovertible.</p>
<p>7.  2<hi rend="superscript">d</hi> Ch<hi rend="superscript">r.</hi><lb/>
<hi rend="underline">Onus</hi> of producing<lb/>
Data lies on the approvers<lb/>
of the Senate.</p>
<pb/>
<p>25.  <unclear>Hispanicé</unclear> Data useful?<lb/>
Plan for forming a<lb/>
well-grounded estimate<lb/>
of the balance on the<lb/>
side of good or evil<lb/>
from a Second Chamber<lb/>
taking U.S. for example.<lb/>
Examine and class<lb/>
the Laws &amp;c passed from<lb/>
the establishment of<lb/>
the Legislative body of<lb/>
the Union</p>
<pb/>
<p>(3)</p>
<p>1.  Model England<lb/>
Cause of the adaption<lb/>
Authority-begotten prejudice.</p>
<p>2.  Model England<lb/>
Of all forms of Government<lb/>
then known the English the best.</p>
<p>3.  Model England<lb/>
In England were two houses –<lb/>
therefore two house adopted<lb/>
in U.S.</p>
<p>4.  Model England<lb/>
then why not a King? because<lb/>
they considered themselves<lb/>
as rebels against the King<lb/>
not against the Lords.</p>
<p>5.  Model England<lb/>
In truth Lords' interest<lb/>
more opposed to that of the<lb/>
people than the King's.</p>
<p>6.  Model England<lb/>
Suposed superior wisdom<lb/>
of the Lords.</p>
<p>7.  Model England<lb/>
The contrary is the fact.</p>
<p>8.  Model England<lb/>
But said U.S. legislator,<lb/>
in England Lords were<lb/>
hereitary &amp; named<lb/>
by the King here they<lb/>
are though by means<lb/>
of intermediate authority<lb/>
named by the people.</p>
<p>9.  Model England<lb/>
This true to a degree but<lb/>
not to a sufficient degree.</p>
<p>10.<lb/>
Cause 2<hi rend="superscript">d.</hi> self-sufficiency<lb/>
with distrust of others.</p>
<p>11.<lb/>
Persons kept in leading<lb/>
strings not the electors,<lb/>
but the select few located<lb/>
by them.</p>
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Untranscribed}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Ready_For_Review}}

Revision as of 03:43, 27 December 2021

Click Here To Edit

Constitutional Code.

1. 2d Chr. Senate Delay
U.S. Senate attributes
purely mischievous – in
respect of delay & expense
mischievous by the amount
of those effects.

2. 2d Chr. Senate Useless
Benefit none.

3. 2d Chr. Senate Data?
For a debtor & creditor
account data wanting.
Heads the following –

1. 2d Chr. Senate Delay
U.S. Senate attributes
purely mischievous – in
respect of delay & expense
mischievous by the amount
of those effects.

2dChr I. Delay
1. Acts come before the
Senate List.
2. Acts rejected, List.
3. Acts passed
1. No. of days in House
of Representatives.

2. do. in Senate.

4. 2d Chr. Senate Data?
Heads in relation to
which long acquaintance
with proceedings necessary.
1. Bills rejected never
brought forward again
effects good & bad.
2. So as to amendments
made.

5. 2d Chr. Senate Data?
Objection will the profit
of the inquiry be adequate
to the trouble.

6. 2d Chr. Senate Data?
Answer yes the inquiry
indispensable because
delay & expense
of Senate are evils
sensible & incontrovertible.

7. 2d Chr.
Onus of producing
Data lies on the approvers
of the Senate.


---page break---

25. Hispanicé Data useful?
Plan for forming a
well-grounded estimate
of the balance on the
side of good or evil
from a Second Chamber
taking U.S. for example.
Examine and class
the Laws &c passed from
the establishment of
the Legislative body of
the Union


---page break---

(3)

1. Model England
Cause of the adaption
Authority-begotten prejudice.

2. Model England
Of all forms of Government
then known the English the best.

3. Model England
In England were two houses –
therefore two house adopted
in U.S.

4. Model England
then why not a King? because
they considered themselves
as rebels against the King
not against the Lords.

5. Model England
In truth Lords' interest
more opposed to that of the
people than the King's.

6. Model England
Suposed superior wisdom
of the Lords.

7. Model England
The contrary is the fact.

8. Model England
But said U.S. legislator,
in England Lords were
hereitary & named
by the King here they
are though by means
of intermediate authority
named by the people.

9. Model England
This true to a degree but
not to a sufficient degree.

10.
Cause 2d. self-sufficiency
with distrust of others.

11.
Persons kept in leading
strings not the electors,
but the select few located
by them.


Identifier: | JB/023/003/002"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 23.

Date_1

1829-11-17

Marginal Summary Numbering

1-16

Box

023

Main Headings

constitutional code

Folio number

003a"a" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 3.

Info in main headings field

constitutional code us

Image

002

Titles

Category

marginal summary sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

d6 / f7

Penner

john flowerdew colls

Watermarks

b&m 1828

Marginals

Paper Producer

arthur moore; richard doane

Corrections

jeremy bentham

Paper Produced in Year

1828

Notes public

ID Number

7874

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in