JB/010/055/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/010/055/001: Difference between revisions

Susan S (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Susan S (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 2: Line 2:
'''[{{fullurl:JB/010/055/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
'''[{{fullurl:JB/010/055/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<head>1821. Sept. 28</head><lb/>To ? 1st James<lb/>When frozen?<lb/>use as a judge<!-- Pencil note in margin --><lb/>I hang on to the principal judication filed by a<lb/>Judge or Judges, the appendicious judication filed by<lb/>a Jury is production of good in a <gap/> <gap/><lb/>to the principal <add>& <gap/></add> end of Judication. it is production of<lb/>evil in a strong <del><gap/></del><add>detrimental</add> to the <gap/> and of<lb/>judication namely delay, vexation and expence.<lb/>The good is that art is prejudiced, according to<lb/><gap/>. Of course the object is to employ this<lb/>appendage when the good is preponderant, to put it<lb/>used when the end is preponderant.<lb/><gap/> with reference to the direct end is inter. if<lb/>judication, the subsidiary or occasional judicating <add><gap/></add>called<lb/>a Jury is <del><gap/></del> production of good by giving common<lb/>to appropriate aptitude on the part of the judge in a<lb/>spirit of all <gap/> those several elements or branches<lb/>1. In respect of moral aptitude. Considered with<lb/>reformers a last <add>causis or such</add> cause is met      
<head>1821. Sept. 28</head><lb/>To ? 1st James<lb/>When frozen?<lb/>use as a judge<!-- Pencil note in margin --><lb/><p>I hang on to the principal judication filed by a<lb/>Judge or Judges, the appendicious judication filed by<lb/>a Jury is production of good in a <gap/> <gap/><lb/>to the principal <add>& <gap/></add> end of Judication. it is production of<lb/>evil in a strong <del><gap/></del><add>detrimental</add> to the <gap/> and of<lb/>judication namely delay, vexation and expence.<lb/>The good is that art is prejudiced, according to<lb/><gap/>. Of course the object is to employ this<lb/>appendage when the good is preponderant, to put it<lb/>used when the end is preponderant.<lb/><gap/> with reference to the direct end is inter. if<lb/>judication, the subsidiary or occasional judicating <add><gap/></add>called<lb/>a Jury is <del><gap/></del> production of good by giving common<lb/>to appropriate aptitude on the part of the judge in a<lb/>spirit of all <gap/> those several elements or branches<lb/>1. In respect of moral aptitude. Considered with<lb/>reformers a just <add>causis or such</add> cause is met <gap/> <gap/> <gap/> <add>individually</add>, it<lb/>in many cases when by reason of deficiency in several<lb/>aptitude the decision of Judge would be contrary <add>opposite</add> to the<lb/>direct and principal and <add><gap/></add>of Justice, and thence become<lb/>misdecision, it substitutes go to such sorry decision<lb/>a right one.</p>   





Revision as of 19:13, 8 January 2022

Click Here To Edit

1821. Sept. 28
To ? 1st James
When frozen?
use as a judge

I hang on to the principal judication filed by a
Judge or Judges, the appendicious judication filed by
a Jury is production of good in a
to the principal & end of Judication. it is production of
evil in a strong detrimental to the and of
judication namely delay, vexation and expence.
The good is that art is prejudiced, according to
. Of course the object is to employ this
appendage when the good is preponderant, to put it
used when the end is preponderant.
with reference to the direct end is inter. if
judication, the subsidiary or occasional judicating called
a Jury is production of good by giving common
to appropriate aptitude on the part of the judge in a
spirit of all those several elements or branches
1. In respect of moral aptitude. Considered with
reformers a just causis or such cause is met individually, it
in many cases when by reason of deficiency in several
aptitude the decision of Judge would be contrary opposite to the
direct and principal and of Justice, and thence become
misdecision, it substitutes go to such sorry decision
a right one.




Identifier: | JB/010/055/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 10.

Date_1

1821-09-28

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

010

Main Headings

Folio number

055

Info in main headings field

to arguelles on juries

Image

001

Titles

Category

correspondence

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

c1

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

c wilmott 1819

Marginals

Paper Producer

andreas louriottis

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

1819

Notes public

see note to letter 2742, vol. 10

ID Number

3491

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in