JB/118/020/002: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/118/020/002: Difference between revisions

Kdownunder (talk | contribs)
m Protected "JB/118/020/002": ready for review ([Edit=Allow only administrators] (indefinite) [Move=Allow only administrators] (indefinite))
Kdownunder (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 2: Line 2:
'''[{{fullurl:JB/118/020/002|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
'''[{{fullurl:JB/118/020/002|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
 
<p>to your Lordships, <add><del>&amp;</del></add> as far as a negative, and such<lb/>
''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
a negative, can be proved.  But <del>to be believed<lb/>
 
<gap/></del> here surely averment may be received for<lb/>
 
proof:  for of what is convenient to an individual<lb/>
 
being of <del>sound mind</del> full age and ordinary discretion,<lb/>
who but that individual shall judge?</p>
<p>A situation in itself not equally convenient<lb/>
might as far as pecuniary advantage is included<lb/>
in the idea of convenience be rendered<lb/>
equally convenient by a pecuniary compensation<lb/>
given in proportion to the want of intrinsic<lb/>
convenience.  But out of whose pocket <add>but that of the public</add> would <del>the</del><lb/>
such compensation have to <del>be</del> come? – <del>out<lb/>
of that public</del>  Any such other situation there<lb/>
would not be <del>as according to the Act as ought<lb/>
to be</del> equally convenient with reference to the<lb/>
public, as according to the Act it ought to be.</p>
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Untranscribed}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Ready_For_Review}}

Revision as of 03:41, 10 January 2022

Click Here To Edit

to your Lordships, & as far as a negative, and such
a negative, can be proved. But to be believed
here surely averment may be received for
proof: for of what is convenient to an individual
being of sound mind full age and ordinary discretion,
who but that individual shall judge?

A situation in itself not equally convenient
might as far as pecuniary advantage is included
in the idea of convenience be rendered
equally convenient by a pecuniary compensation
given in proportion to the want of intrinsic
convenience. But out of whose pocket but that of the public would the
such compensation have to be come? – out
of that public
Any such other situation there
would not be as according to the Act as ought
to be
equally convenient with reference to the
public, as according to the Act it ought to be.


Identifier: | JB/118/020/002"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 118.

Date_1

Marginal Summary Numbering

30

Box

118

Main Headings

panopticon

Folio number

020

Info in main headings field

memorial

Image

002

Titles

Category

correspondence

Number of Pages

4

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

f41 / f42 / f43 / f44

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

Marginals

jeremy bentham

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

draft of letter 988, vol. 5

ID Number

39074

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in