JB/118/035/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/118/035/001: Difference between revisions

Kdownunder (talk | contribs)
m Protected "JB/118/035/001": ready for review ([Edit=Allow only administrators] (indefinite) [Move=Allow only administrators] (indefinite))
Kdownunder (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 2: Line 2:
'''[{{fullurl:JB/118/035/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
'''[{{fullurl:JB/118/035/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
 
<p>I <del>repeat it, the</del> <add><del>must</del> say,</add> <hi rend="underline">acknowledged</hi>:  <del>interests of the<lb/>
''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
public resource</del> for really, Sir, <del>there</del><hi rend="superscript">⊞</hi> <note><hi rend="superscript">⊞</hi> <del>of the London set</del> <add>about the</add>  importance <add>of the circumstance</add> of <del>a</del> vicinity to the capital as the great seat of inspection</note> is not an<lb/>
 
opinion of my own starting:  it is no new-fangled<lb/>
 
concept of mine:  it <del>is</del> <add>has been</add> without any exception that<lb/>
 
I have of the opinion of every man who has<lb/>
ever turned his thoughts, and great numbers of very<lb/>
<add><del><gap/></del></add> respectable men have turned their thoughts to this<lb/>
<add><del>practice <gap/> to the</del> part of the</add> subject.  It <del>in</del> <add>was <del>were the and for <gap/> I have suppose is</del></add> the opinion<hi rend="superscript">⊞</hi> <note><hi rend="superscript">⊞</hi> <del><gap/> they might differ in their application</del> <add>whatsoever difference might arise on the application</add> of it to a particular spot,) it was the opinion of <del>I say</del></note> of all the <del>Supervision judges</del><lb/>
<add>Judges</add> it was the opinion of all the Supervisors (and <del>you</del> <add>it</add><lb/>
may <del>recollect</del> <add>be in your recollection,</add> Sir, that there were <del><gap/></del> <add>different</add> sets of<lb/>
them) that were <del><gap/></del> successively appointed for the<lb/>
originally intended Penitentiary House.  It was the<lb/>
opinion of every Committee of the House of Commons<lb/>
that ever sat upon the measure.  It was the opinion <del>the</del><lb/>
of <add><del>under</del></add> M<hi rend="superscript">r</hi> Howard, <del>D<hi rend="superscript">r Fothergill and</hi></del> of <add><del>of <gap/></del></add> M<hi rend="superscript">r</hi> <unclear>Whateby</unclear> <del><gap/></del><lb/>
and of D<hi rend="superscript">r</hi> Fothergil, who <add><gap/> <del><gap/></del> it into the bosom of M<hi rend="superscript">r</hi> Howard</add> sealed <del>it</del> with the dying breath of Sir William Blackstone.</p>
<p>It <del>was <gap/> or at least</del> was the opinion of<lb/>
Sir Charles Bunbury, Sir, Bilgert Elliot and D<hi rend="superscript">r</hi><lb/>
Bowdler <del><gap/> <gap/></del><hi rend="superscript">⊞</hi> <note><hi rend="superscript">⊞</hi> and by whom the present spot was situated for <del>that</del> <add>this</add> cause:</note> it was the opinion of the Committee<lb/>
of 1784 of which Sir Charles Bunbury was<lb/>
Chairman:  and <del>by</del> <add>in</add> whose Report among the advantages<lb/>
which recommended the spot in question<lb/>
to their repeated and material choice <del>they may <gap/></del> <add>it occupies a</add>
<del>occupies the present</del> <add>distinguished</add> place.  It is <del>at least</del> <add>or at any rate</add> very lately<lb/>
was <add>so much</add> the opinion of Sir Charles Bunbury that after perusing<lb/>
the paper before submitted to you, Sir, in defence<lb/>
of this very choice, he was pleased to pronounce it, I remember<lb/>
<del><gap/></del> his very word, <hi rend="underline">unanswerable</hi>.</p>
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Untranscribed}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Ready_For_Review}}

Revision as of 05:30, 12 January 2022

Click Here To Edit

I repeat it, the must say, acknowledged: interests of the
public resource
for really, Sir, there of the London set about the importance of the circumstance of a vicinity to the capital as the great seat of inspection is not an
opinion of my own starting: it is no new-fangled
concept of mine: it is has been without any exception that
I have of the opinion of every man who has
ever turned his thoughts, and great numbers of very
respectable men have turned their thoughts to this
practice to the part of the subject. It in was were the and for I have suppose is the opinion they might differ in their application whatsoever difference might arise on the application of it to a particular spot,) it was the opinion of I say of all the Supervision judges
Judges it was the opinion of all the Supervisors (and you it
may recollect be in your recollection, Sir, that there were different sets of
them) that were successively appointed for the
originally intended Penitentiary House. It was the
opinion of every Committee of the House of Commons
that ever sat upon the measure. It was the opinion the
of under Mr Howard, Dr Fothergill and of of Mr Whateby
and of Dr Fothergil, who it into the bosom of Mr Howard sealed it with the dying breath of Sir William Blackstone.

It was or at least was the opinion of
Sir Charles Bunbury, Sir, Bilgert Elliot and Dr
Bowdler and by whom the present spot was situated for that this cause: it was the opinion of the Committee
of 1784 of which Sir Charles Bunbury was
Chairman: and by in whose Report among the advantages
which recommended the spot in question
to their repeated and material choice they may it occupies a occupies the present distinguished place. It is at least or at any rate very lately
was so much the opinion of Sir Charles Bunbury that after perusing
the paper before submitted to you, Sir, in defence
of this very choice, he was pleased to pronounce it, I remember
his very word, unanswerable.


Identifier: | JB/118/035/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 118.

Date_1

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

118

Main Headings

panopticon

Folio number

035

Info in main headings field

to dundas

Image

001

Titles

Category

correspondence

Number of Pages

2

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

f13 / f14

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

Marginals

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

draft of letter 988, vol. 5

ID Number

39089

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in