JB/052/373/001

Click Here To Edit

18287. Nov 2 Feb.2

Law Amendment. Propositions.
Ch.VII Probation and Evidence
§.18. Character Evidence
11

So as to number of
witnesses imputing
mendacity to the primary
mendacity imputing
witnesses
Ratiocinative Art. 11 4. But if in the first instance no well-grounded limit
could be put to the number of mendacity-imputing witnesses
or per Art. 10 so neither could there be to the number
of mendacity-imputing witnesses whose evidence were the
a mended for the purpose of imputing mendacity to any
of the first one of mendacity-imputing witnesses
here then might be a second set, thence a third set and so
in the number menacing in a geometrical ratio

12
The effect would be
including in the bosom
of a suit a number of
distinct suits

Ratiocinative

Art.12.5. To an assertion imputing habitual
mendacity to a man to an assertion to this effect has
in decidedly so ever mendacion, no punishment
as for mendacity could be attached, useless assation of
individual acts of mendacity in having been commited in
so many individual occasions were removed. But to
give acceptance to such tions would be to united.
in the bosom of this suit, the procedures in relation to as are many
of those distinguishable such as those acts of mendacity
so imputed: for evidence as in other cases so
in this: if crimin or inculpable evidence were received
how ably with justice could excrimination or exculpable
evidence be excluded?

Identifier: | JB/052/373/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 52.
Date_1	1828-02-02	Marginal Summary Numbering	11-12
Box	052	Main Headings
Folio number	373	Info in main headings field	law amendment
Image	001	Titles	ratiocinative / ratiocinative
Category	text sheet	Number of Pages	1
Recto/Verso	recto	Page Numbering	d4 / e4
Penner	jeremy bentham	Watermarks	j whatman turkey mill 1827
Marginals	george bentham	Paper Producer	jonathan blenman
Corrections		Paper Produced in Year	1827
Notes public		ID Number	17046
Box Contents