JB/078/055/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/078/055/001: Difference between revisions

Keithompson (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Keithompson (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 10: Line 10:
<del>128.129 128.</del> <add>147</add> <del>129</del><p><add>203</add> <del>219 220 221 Great leap p.148</del><add>114</add></p>
<del>128.129 128.</del> <add>147</add> <del>129</del><p><add>203</add> <del>219 220 221 Great leap p.148</del><add>114</add></p>


Sample deduced for the <del>only</del> work of our <gap/> <del>of</del> are the<lb/>
<p>Sample deduced for the <del>only</del> work of our <gap/> <del>of</del> are the<lb/>
following <del>1. Natural Equity p. 129</del> 1. Natural justice p.118. 119<lb/>
following <del>1. Natural Equity p. 129</del> 1. Natural justice p.118. 119<lb/>
2. Equity. 119. 3 Natural Equity. p. 129. 4. Justice p. 1161.221. <note><add>[+]</add> First principle of property?<lb/>
2. Equity. 119. 3 Natural Equity. p. 129. 4. Justice p. 161.221. <lb/>
5. Natural feeling p 203. 6. <add>harsh law</add> cries feelingly for correction. 7 On <lb/>
present law violates the first principle of property. <add>p.220. [+]</add> <del>than allowed</del> <note><add>[+]</add> First principle of property?<lb/>
What <gap/> is it<lb/>
What <gap/> is it<lb/>
<del>How <gap/></del><lb/>
<del>How <gap/></del><lb/>
Line 23: Line 25:
Rome-bad, in the quasi-<lb/>
Rome-bad, in the quasi-<lb/>
Hibernian state to <del>the</del> the<lb/>
Hibernian state to <del>the</del> the<lb/>
species od controul to denominated <lb/>
species of controul to denominated <lb/>
the undenominated.<lb/>
the undenominated.<lb/>
Yet, for it<lb/>
Yet, for it<lb/>
Line 37: Line 39:
<del>and making use of it</del><lb/>
<del>and making use of it</del><lb/>
and applying it.</note><lb/>
and applying it.</note><lb/>
<del><gap/> but not denominated: not arm in the Rome-bred quasi-</del><lb/>
<del>-Hibernian made - as <gap/> case of the species of contract</del> deno<del>minated</del><lb/>
<del>the <hi rend="underline">innomination</hi> But</del> "<hi rend="underline">quasi <gap/> ignominates</hi><lb/>
<hi rend="underline">colites, hime vibes annuntro</hi>. <del>I shall be disapp<gap/> This</del><lb/>
<del>denomination I shall be disappointed if by his <gap/></del><lb/>
<del><gap/> my learned Member does no sanction it. First of the  <gap/></del><lb/>
<del>principle, though without <add><gap/></add> giving the <gap/> to it, he actual actually</del><lb/>
<del>does make application</del>: Witness two passages: <del><gap/></del> <add>p</add> 114. "One<lb/>
"claimant ought not to <hi rend="underline">disappoint</hi> another in p. 148. "The<lb/>
"Lord's gain is far from commensurate to to his tenant's loss<lb/>
Compare this with what <add>by the courtesy of England,</add> is called <hi rend="underline">reasoning</hi>, in Judge-made  <lb/>
law! </p>
<del>A French work of great merit</del> <add>The <add>honest and excellent</add></add><add><del><gap/></del> work in French law on this subject</add> <hi rend="underline">Le Parfait Nature</hi><lb/>
has been <del><gap/></del> already mentioned: <add>In the mere act of</add> Cutting <del>upon</del><add>open</add> the <gap/> of it, <del>without</del> <lb/>
<del>any <add>a thought</add> intention of present rea</del>ding no fare this <gap/>tion of their<lb/>
gasseous standards <del>of rectitude</del> caught my eye. <del>I look it</del><lb/>
list of them <add>I took</add> <del>but it <gap/></del> his unfortunately  been me<gap/>ed. <add>In addition to those abovementioned</add>: feeling<lb/>




<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{In_Progress}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{In_Progress}}

Revision as of 10:06, 24 January 2022

Click Here To Edit

1826. Decr.8 +

Ch Agenda
1. Matter
§. Standard of rectitude

Review of Humphreys.

128.129 128. 147 129

203 219 220 221 Great leap p.148114

Sample deduced for the only work of our of are the
following 1. Natural Equity p. 129 1. Natural justice p.118. 119
2. Equity. 119. 3 Natural Equity. p. 129. 4. Justice p. 161.221.
5. Natural feeling p 203. 6. harsh law cries feelingly for correction. 7 On
present law violates the first principle of property. p.220. [+] than allowed [+] First principle of property?
What is it
How
name? does our
himself give to
it: none has any person
also ever give to it. Not
so now that gives in
here using to send,
Rome-bad, in the quasi-
Hibernian state to the the
species of controul to denominated
the undenominated.
Yet, for it
to a newer and
highly is its of the somebody
must stand Godfather
Will then. As to the
thing itself, it is
gratifying it is to
to see my learned Master
already recognizing it
and making use of it
and applying it.

but not denominated: not arm in the Rome-bred quasi-
-Hibernian made - as case of the species of contract denominated
the innomination But "quasi ignominates
colites, hime vibes annuntro. I shall be disapp This
denomination I shall be disappointed if by his
my learned Member does no sanction it. First of the
principle, though without giving the to it, he actual actually
does make application: Witness two passages: p 114. "One
"claimant ought not to disappoint another in p. 148. "The
"Lord's gain is far from commensurate to to his tenant's loss
Compare this with what by the courtesy of England, is called reasoning, in Judge-made
law!

A French work of great merit The <add>honest and excellent</add> work in French law on this subject Le Parfait Nature
has been already mentioned: In the mere act of Cutting uponopen the of it, without
any a thought intention of present reading no fare this tion of their
gasseous standards of rectitude caught my eye. I look it
list of them I took but it his unfortunately been meed. In addition to those abovementioned: feeling



Identifier: | JB/078/055/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 78.

Date_1

1826-12-08

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

078

Main Headings

Review of Humphreys

Folio number

055

Info in main headings field

Review of Humphreys

Image

001

Titles

Category

Text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

E5

Penner

Watermarks

Marginals

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

25146

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in