★ Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.
m Protected "JB/117/348/001": ready for review ([Edit=Allow only administrators] (indefinite) [Move=Allow only administrators] (indefinite)) |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
'''[{{fullurl:JB/117/348/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]''' | '''[{{fullurl:JB/117/348/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]''' | ||
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
<p><del>But</del> <add>All this while,</add> upon the face of the questions that <del>are</del> <add>lie</add> before me<lb/> | <p><del>But</del> <add>All this while,</add> upon the face of the questions that <del>are</del> <add>lie</add> before me<lb/> | ||
the alternative which I see is not between the <del>130</del><lb/> | the alternative which I see is not between the <del>130</del><lb/> | ||
| Line 25: | Line 15: | ||
safe custody, in respect of the numbers and the vicinity<lb/> | safe custody, in respect of the numbers and the vicinity<lb/> | ||
of the metropolis.</p> | of the metropolis.</p> | ||
<p><add>On this subject,</add> What I have said elsewhere and in print<hi rend="superscript">†</hi> <note><hi rend="superscript">†</hi></note>, there can<lb/> | |||
be no need of repeating <del>it</del> here. If it has had the honour<lb/> | |||
of being read, the result must be that it has not had the<lb/> | |||
good fortune to prove, <add>at least for the present,</add> satisfactory to the Gentlemen <del>I have</del> <add>here</add><lb/> | |||
<del>in view</del> <add>in question</add>. Nothing that is in my power towards rendering<lb/> | |||
it so shall be wanting.</p> | |||
<p>Let but room <del>be provided</del> <add>sufficient</add> for the numbers agreed on<lb/> | |||
viz. the 1000 <del><gap/></del> males (plus the <hi rend="underline">now</hi> proposed 300 females<lb/> | |||
be provided: let last a possibility of coming back to the agreement<lb/> | |||
be preserved, the <del>present</del> <add>immediate</add> fulfilment shall be waived.</p> | |||
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{ | {{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Ready_For_Review}} | ||
But All this while, upon the face of the questions that are lie before me
the alternative which I see is not between the 130
number of £1,300 prisoners that could be composed of the 1000
the agreed-on number of males, viz. 1,000, and the now
proposed or supposed additional numbers of females, viz. 300,
but between a total of no more than 1000, (3-wh whereof 300 of them
females, having 700 males,) and a total of 700,
having whereof 300 females, having but 400 males.
Looking out for the reason The proposed reduction
being so considerable, looking out for the reason – which
I have been able to collect is – an apprehension about
safe custody, in respect of the numbers and the vicinity
of the metropolis.
On this subject, What I have said elsewhere and in print† †, there can
be no need of repeating it here. If it has had the honour
of being read, the result must be that it has not had the
good fortune to prove, at least for the present, satisfactory to the Gentlemen I have here
in view in question. Nothing that is in my power towards rendering
it so shall be wanting.
Let but room be provided sufficient for the numbers agreed on
viz. the 1000 males (plus the now proposed 300 females
be provided: let last a possibility of coming back to the agreement
be preserved, the present immediate fulfilment shall be waived.
|
Identifier: | JB/117/348/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 117. |
|||
|---|---|---|---|
|
17-20 |
|||
|
117 |
panopticon |
||
|
348 |
panopt. letter ii females |
||
|
001 |
|||
|
correspondence |
1 |
||
|
recto |
f7 |
||
|
jeremy bentham |
|||
|
letter 2110, vol. 8 |
38965 |
||
