JB/117/350/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/117/350/001: Difference between revisions

Kdownunder (talk | contribs)
m Protected "JB/117/350/001": ready for review ([Edit=Allow only administrators] (indefinite) [Move=Allow only administrators] (indefinite))
Kdownunder (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 2: Line 2:
'''[{{fullurl:JB/117/350/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
'''[{{fullurl:JB/117/350/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
 
<p>"But if your <add>agreed-on</add> number of 1000 males is reduced <add>(it may be said)</add> to 700,<lb/>
''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
you will have <del>no less</del> so much the less profit <gap/> to cover<lb/>
 
the above supposed loss upon the 300 females where,<hi rend="superscript">⊞</hi> <note><hi rend="superscript">⊞</hi> unless <del>the</del> your <del>scheme of a</del> <add>proposed</add> <hi rend="underline">temporary</hi> establishment be <del>adopted</del> rendered <hi rend="underline">permanent</hi>,</note> you are to<lb/>
 
<del>have at all events</del> <add>have at all events:</add>  and if <del>to</del> reduced to 400, <add>you will have</add> still less:<lb/>
 
which <del>in respect of</del> <add>on <del>to</del> the expence of</add> the official Establishment, the reduction, if any<lb/>
reduction there can be, will be surrendered from <del>proportionable</del> being proportionable.</p>
<p><del>To</del> All this I am fully aware of:  and to this <del>part</del><lb/>
my answer is the same as to that respecting the <del>females</del><lb/>
<add>introduction of the females,</add> as above.  Let the profit, so long as there is any, upon<lb/>
the 700, or, though it be <add>upon</add> no more than <add>the</add> 400, <del>of the</del> <hi rend="underline">effectives</hi>,<lb/>
<del>cover the</del> be employed in covering the deficiency produced<lb/>
by the <hi rend="underline">non-effectives</hi>.</p>
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Untranscribed}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Ready_For_Review}}

Revision as of 06:09, 6 February 2022

Click Here To Edit

"But if your agreed-on number of 1000 males is reduced (it may be said) to 700,
you will have no less so much the less profit to cover
the above supposed loss upon the 300 females where, unless the your scheme of a proposed temporary establishment be adopted rendered permanent, you are to
have at all events have at all events: and if to reduced to 400, you will have still less:
which in respect of on to the expence of the official Establishment, the reduction, if any
reduction there can be, will be surrendered from proportionable being proportionable.

To All this I am fully aware of: and to this part
my answer is the same as to that respecting the females
introduction of the females, as above. Let the profit, so long as there is any, upon
the 700, or, though it be upon no more than the 400, of the effectives,
cover the be employed in covering the deficiency produced
by the non-effectives.


Identifier: | JB/117/350/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 117.

Date_1

Marginal Summary Numbering

24-25

Box

117

Main Headings

panopticon

Folio number

350

Info in main headings field

letter ii females

Image

001

Titles

Category

correspondence

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

f9

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

Marginals

jeremy bentham

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

letter 2110, vol. 8

ID Number

38967

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in