JB/034/060/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/034/060/001: Difference between revisions

BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Kdownunder (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 2: Line 2:
'''[{{fullurl:JB/034/060/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
'''[{{fullurl:JB/034/060/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<p><head>Ch.  Quasi Jury<lb/>
&sect;. 5.  Functions.</head></p>


''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''


<p>1823. Oct. 17  <unclear>Seen</unclear> Dec<hi rend="superscript">r</hi> 23<lb/>
<head><del>Constitutional Code</del> or Procedure</head></p>
<p><head>Ch. Quasi Jury<lb/>
&sect;. 5.  III. <add>Functions individual</add> Interpretative function</head></p>
<p>23 or 1.<lb/>
Art 1.  [II. Expositions]<lb/>
Interrogation is imperative<lb/>
thus applied:<lb/>
viz. to extraction of assertions<lb/>
corresponding<lb/>
to the interrogative.</p>
<p>24 or 2.<lb/>
Art 2.  Correspondent to<lb/>
interrogative function,<lb/>
is responsive d<hi rend="superscript">o.</hi> or<lb/>
service:  object of interrogative,<lb/>
production<lb/>
of the correspondent<lb/>
responsive.</p>
<p>25 or 3.<lb/>
Art 3.  Qualities in response,<lb/>
if given, necessary<lb/>
to the existence<lb/>
of obligation to exercise<lb/>
the responsive.<lb/>
1.  Relevancy, as to the<lb/>
matter in hand.<lb/>
2.  Possible aptitude to<lb/>
be, on the occasion<lb/>
in question, conducive<lb/>
to the ends of judicature.</p>
<p>26 or 4.<lb/>
Art 4.  Persons to whom<lb/>
with a view to those<lb/>
ends, a Quasi Juryman<lb/>
is authorized to address<lb/>
questions in expectation<lb/>
of receiving answers,<lb/>
are actors &amp;c. in general,<lb/>
as per Ch. XI. &sect;.:<lb/>
in particular, these<lb/>
1.  A party on either side,<lb/>
viz. either as party litigant,<lb/>
as as d<hi rend="superscript">o.</hi> testifying.<lb/>
2.  Extraneous witness.<lb/>
3.  Assistant, non-professional<lb/>
or professional<lb/>
on either side.<lb/>
4.  Pursuer Gen<hi rend="superscript">l.</hi> of Depute.<lb/>
5.  Defender Gen<hi rend="superscript">l.</hi> or d<hi rend="superscript">o.</hi><lb/>
6.  Registrar or d<hi rend="superscript">o.</hi><lb/>
7.  Fellow Juryman.<lb/>
8.  Officiating Judge.</p>
<pb/>
<p><head>Ch. Quasi Jury<lb/>
&sect;. 5.  III. <add>Functions individual</add> Interpretative function</head></p>
<p>27 or 5.<lb/>
Art 5.  If relevant and<lb/>
apt response, question<lb/>
neither irrelevant nor<lb/>
otherwise unapt is<lb/>
followed, well.  Questions<lb/>
to other than Judges<lb/>
relevant and apt, if response<lb/>
d<hi rend="superscript">o.</hi> fails to follow,<lb/>
Judge applies himself<lb/>
to the exaction of d<hi rend="superscript">o.</hi><lb/>
responses, according<lb/>
to non-complying interrogative's<lb/>
situation<lb/>
as to the suit.</p>
<p>28 or 6.<lb/>
Art 6.  If party, of non-compliance<lb/>
the effect<lb/>
he gives him to understand<lb/>
may be loss of<lb/>
suit:  on pursuer's side,<lb/>
non-<unclear>reddition</unclear> of the service<lb/>
demanded:  on<lb/>
defender's, reddition of<lb/>
d<hi rend="superscript">o.</hi> at his expence:  and<lb/>
such, in case of necessity<lb/>
may be the result.</p>
<p>29 or 7.<lb/>
Art 7.  So, non-complying<lb/>
interrogatee, an assistant<lb/>
professional or<lb/>
non-professional of<lb/>
party:  if in Judge's opinion<lb/>
such non-compliance<lb/>
is in concert with, or<lb/>
with consent of party,<lb/>
to save him from loss<lb/>
of suit – and such in<lb/>
case of necessity may be<lb/>
the result.</p>
<p>30 or 8.<lb/>
Art 8.  If Pursuer Gen<hi rend="superscript">l.</hi> or Def<hi rend="superscript">r.</hi><lb/>
Gen<hi rend="superscript">l.</hi>, Registrar or their Deputes,<lb/>
Judge will cause<lb/>
minute to be made in Incidental<lb/>
comp<hi rend="superscript">t.</hi> Book as per<lb/>
Ch. XI. &sect;. &amp; proceed as there<lb/>
directed.</p>
<p>31 or 9.<lb/>
Art 9.  So, if a fellow Juryman.</p>
<p>32 or 10.<lb/>
So the Registrar, if it be<lb/>
the officiating Judge.</p>
<pb/><p><head></head></p>




<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Untranscribed}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{In_Progress}}

Revision as of 05:01, 15 February 2022

Click Here To Edit

Ch. Quasi Jury
§. 5. Functions.



1823. Oct. 17 Seen Decr 23
Constitutional Code or Procedure

Ch. Quasi Jury
§. 5. III. Functions individual Interpretative function

23 or 1.
Art 1. [II. Expositions]
Interrogation is imperative
thus applied:
viz. to extraction of assertions
corresponding
to the interrogative.

24 or 2.
Art 2. Correspondent to
interrogative function,
is responsive do. or
service: object of interrogative,
production
of the correspondent
responsive.

25 or 3.
Art 3. Qualities in response,
if given, necessary
to the existence
of obligation to exercise
the responsive.
1. Relevancy, as to the
matter in hand.
2. Possible aptitude to
be, on the occasion
in question, conducive
to the ends of judicature.

26 or 4.
Art 4. Persons to whom
with a view to those
ends, a Quasi Juryman
is authorized to address
questions in expectation
of receiving answers,
are actors &c. in general,
as per Ch. XI. §.:
in particular, these
1. A party on either side,
viz. either as party litigant,
as as do. testifying.
2. Extraneous witness.
3. Assistant, non-professional
or professional
on either side.
4. Pursuer Genl. of Depute.
5. Defender Genl. or do.
6. Registrar or do.
7. Fellow Juryman.
8. Officiating Judge.


---page break---

Ch. Quasi Jury
§. 5. III. Functions individual Interpretative function

27 or 5.
Art 5. If relevant and
apt response, question
neither irrelevant nor
otherwise unapt is
followed, well. Questions
to other than Judges
relevant and apt, if response
do. fails to follow,
Judge applies himself
to the exaction of do.
responses, according
to non-complying interrogative's
situation
as to the suit.

28 or 6.
Art 6. If party, of non-compliance
the effect
he gives him to understand
may be loss of
suit: on pursuer's side,
non-reddition of the service
demanded: on
defender's, reddition of
do. at his expence: and
such, in case of necessity
may be the result.

29 or 7.
Art 7. So, non-complying
interrogatee, an assistant
professional or
non-professional of
party: if in Judge's opinion
such non-compliance
is in concert with, or
with consent of party,
to save him from loss
of suit – and such in
case of necessity may be
the result.

30 or 8.
Art 8. If Pursuer Genl. or Defr.
Genl., Registrar or their Deputes,
Judge will cause
minute to be made in Incidental
compt. Book as per
Ch. XI. §. & proceed as there
directed.

31 or 9.
Art 9. So, if a fellow Juryman.

32 or 10.
So the Registrar, if it be
the officiating Judge.


---page break---



Identifier: | JB/034/060/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 34.

Date_1

1823-10-17

Marginal Summary Numbering

23 or 1 - 32 or 10, 1-5

Box

034

Main Headings

procedure code

Folio number

060

Info in main headings field

procedure

Image

001

Titles

quasi jury / functions individual / interrogative function

Category

marginal summary sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

d3 / e3

Penner

jeremy bentham; john flowerdew colls

Watermarks

Marginals

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

10334

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in