JB/121/375/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/121/375/001: Difference between revisions

Kdownunder (talk | contribs)
m Protected "JB/121/375/001": ready for review ([Edit=Allow only administrators] (indefinite) [Move=Allow only administrators] (indefinite))
Kdownunder (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
'[{{fullurl:JB/121/375/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
'[{{fullurl:JB/121/375/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
 
<p><!-- pencil -->5 Apr 1802  Postpone<lb/>
''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
<head>Dispensing power</head></p>
 
<p>away any part of their reputation – especially of their<lb/>
 
reputation for sincerity, for nothing – it might not<lb/>
 
unnaturally be an object – even with such high personages<lb/>
that when making his complaints to his <add>a</add><lb/>
Parliamentary friends and saying – the Duke of Portland<lb/>
is against me – and upon a wrong ground – he<lb/>
should not have to add – and upon a ground which<lb/>
he knows to be so – and in doing what he does<lb/>
he is acting against the testimony <add>judgment</add> of his own conscience.</p>
<p>On the part of the <gap/> Lords – even of<lb/>
those if any, who were not in the secret – and<lb/>
who were so far out of the secret as to suppose the<lb/>
intention of carrying the establishment into effect to be<lb/>
still entertained by those on <del>whom the</del> <add>whose will</add> it really depended –<lb/>
no very strict scrutiny into the <del>logic</del> <add>tenor</add> of the letter –<lb/>
<del>either</del> in respect of the law of it – the logic of it<lb/>
or every other point contrived in it, was naturally to<lb/>
be apprehended.  For such eyes, whatever feature<lb/>
of illegality, or inexpediency, or perfidy might<lb/>
be contained in the <unclear>pretence</unclear>, it was necessary, or at<lb/>
least prudent <add>desirable at least</add>, that they should have a veil to<lb/>
cover them – <del>but</del> <add>True, but so long as they there was a veil,</add> it could not be necessary that<lb/>
it should be a very thick one – but that it should<lb/>
have any very extraordinary nicety of workmanship<lb/>
in the contrivance of it, could hardly appear necessary.<lb/>
<del>There should be somethin</del> <add>In appearance there should be <unclear>totems</unclear></add> be marks of deference to the<lb/>
authority of Parliament:  as to the reality and sincerity<lb/>
of the deference, those were points for which the persons<lb/>
concerned in the writing and signing the paper would be alone responsible.</p>
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Untranscribed}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Ready_For_Review}}

Revision as of 03:16, 9 March 2022

'Click Here To Edit

5 Apr 1802 Postpone
Dispensing power

away any part of their reputation – especially of their
reputation for sincerity, for nothing – it might not
unnaturally be an object – even with such high personages
that when making his complaints to his a
Parliamentary friends and saying – the Duke of Portland
is against me – and upon a wrong ground – he
should not have to add – and upon a ground which
he knows to be so – and in doing what he does
he is acting against the testimony judgment of his own conscience.

On the part of the Lords – even of
those if any, who were not in the secret – and
who were so far out of the secret as to suppose the
intention of carrying the establishment into effect to be
still entertained by those on whom the whose will it really depended –
no very strict scrutiny into the logic tenor of the letter –
either in respect of the law of it – the logic of it
or every other point contrived in it, was naturally to
be apprehended. For such eyes, whatever feature
of illegality, or inexpediency, or perfidy might
be contained in the pretence, it was necessary, or at
least prudent desirable at least, that they should have a veil to
cover them – but True, but so long as they there was a veil, it could not be necessary that
it should be a very thick one – but that it should
have any very extraordinary nicety of workmanship
in the contrivance of it, could hardly appear necessary.
There should be somethin In appearance there should be totems be marks of deference to the
authority of Parliament: as to the reality and sincerity
of the deference, those were points for which the persons
concerned in the writing and signing the paper would be alone responsible.


Identifier: | JB/121/375/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 121.

Date_1

1802-04-05

Marginal Summary Numbering

Not numbered

Box

121

Main Headings

Panopticon

Folio number

375

Info in main headings field

Dispensing power

Image

001

Titles

Category

Text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

Recto"Recto" is not in the list (recto, verso) of allowed values for the "Rectoverso" property.

Page Numbering

E2 / F35

Penner

Watermarks

Marginals

Jeremy Bentham

Paper Producer

Corrections

Jeremy Bentham

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

[[notes_public::Postpone [note in Bentham's hand]]]

ID Number

001

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in