JB/121/380/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/121/380/001: Difference between revisions

Kdownunder (talk | contribs)
m Protected "JB/121/380/001": ready for review ([Edit=Allow only administrators] (indefinite) [Move=Allow only administrators] (indefinite))
Kdownunder (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
'[{{fullurl:JB/121/380/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
'[{{fullurl:JB/121/380/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
 
<p><!-- pencil -->11 Apr 1802  Postpone<lb/>
''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
<head>Dispensing power</head></p>
 
<p>and this over and above <del>the</del> whatever difficulties<lb/>
 
might have been opposed by the <del>matchless absurdity</del> <add><del>inconspicuous</del> so glaring a mass of absurdities</add><lb/>
 
<del>of the Gaol system</del> <add>as that</add> in which his Grace's Gaol system<lb/>
according to the view Your Lordship has already had of<lb/>
it, has involved.</p>
<p><del>Another</del> An additional difficulty – had there been<lb/>
any thing to say in support of the measure – what<lb/>
should have been the mouth to say it?  <del>M<hi rend="superscript">r</hi></del> Neither<lb/>
M<hi rend="superscript">r</hi> King nor M<hi rend="superscript">r</hi> Baldwin could have done any<lb/>
thing pure.  It is as perfectly known to Your Lordship<lb/>
<add>Lordship's situation, ex</add> as it is unknown to <del>myself</del> <add>me in mine</add> whether it be <add>was</add> by<lb/>
accident or design – and if by design for what reason<lb/>
that <del>in</del> <add>when</add> the Duke of Portland held the seals, the Secretary<lb/>
of State for the <del>House</del> department neither was<lb/>
himself a Representative nor had a Representative<lb/>
<add>an official one at least</add> of his own in the most efficient though least<lb/>
dignified of the <del>Ho</del> two Houses.  Such at any<lb/>
rate was the fact: and although both the learned<lb/>
Gentlemen had been in Parliament (as one of them<lb/>
used to be every now then though which of them<lb/>
may be more than any body in Parliament remembers<lb/>
or ever knew) although his Grace had thus<lb/>
been doubly represented – it seems altogether questionable<lb/>
whether the united genius's of John Doe<lb/>
and Richard Roe would have been able to inspire<lb/>
<add>either of</add> them with any tolerably <add>colourable</add> answer to the strange<lb/>
interrogatories above mentioned.</p>
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Untranscribed}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Ready_For_Review}}

Revision as of 04:16, 9 March 2022

'Click Here To Edit

11 Apr 1802 Postpone
Dispensing power

and this over and above the whatever difficulties
might have been opposed by the matchless absurdity inconspicuous so glaring a mass of absurdities
of the Gaol system as that in which his Grace's Gaol system
according to the view Your Lordship has already had of
it, has involved.

Another An additional difficulty – had there been
any thing to say in support of the measure – what
should have been the mouth to say it? Mr Neither
Mr King nor Mr Baldwin could have done any
thing pure. It is as perfectly known to Your Lordship
Lordship's situation, ex as it is unknown to myself me in mine whether it be was by
accident or design – and if by design for what reason
that in when the Duke of Portland held the seals, the Secretary
of State for the House department neither was
himself a Representative nor had a Representative
an official one at least of his own in the most efficient though least
dignified of the Ho two Houses. Such at any
rate was the fact: and although both the learned
Gentlemen had been in Parliament (as one of them
used to be every now then though which of them
may be more than any body in Parliament remembers
or ever knew) although his Grace had thus
been doubly represented – it seems altogether questionable
whether the united genius's of John Doe
and Richard Roe would have been able to inspire
either of them with any tolerably colourable answer to the strange
interrogatories above mentioned.


Identifier: | JB/121/380/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 121.

Date_1

1802-04-11

Marginal Summary Numbering

5

Box

121

Main Headings

Panopticon

Folio number

380

Info in main headings field

Dispensing power

Image

001

Titles

Category

Text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

Recto"Recto" is not in the list (recto, verso) of allowed values for the "Rectoverso" property.

Page Numbering

D5

Penner

Watermarks

Marginals

Jeremy Bentham

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

[[notes_public::Postpone [note in Bentham's hand]]]

ID Number

001

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in