★ Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.
m Protected "JB/121/447/001": ready for review ([Edit=Allow only administrators] (indefinite) [Move=Allow only administrators] (indefinite)) |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
'[{{fullurl:JB/121/447/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]''' | '[{{fullurl:JB/121/447/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]''' | ||
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
<p><!-- pencil -->4 Apr. 1802<lb/> | |||
<head>Dispensing power</head></p> | |||
<p>It is truly <del>a</del> curious to observe with how profound<lb/> | |||
a contempt the wisdom of Parliament is treated by<lb/> | |||
the wisdom of M<hi rend="superscript">r</hi> Baldwin and M<hi rend="superscript">r</hi> King. Of the<lb/> | |||
<del>three</del> <add>two</add> strictly legal modes of disposing of Convicts<lb/> | |||
Transportation to N.S. Wales and confinement on<lb/> | |||
board the Hulks, there seems <add>seemed</add> some ground for supposing<lb/> | |||
that Parliament at the time of passing the<lb/> | |||
Act for the Penitentiary establishment was not perfectly<lb/> | |||
well satisfied with either, since it passed the Act <add>by the Act it<lb/> | |||
provided</add> for that third mode. <del>With the</del> <add>That the mode of</add> confinement on board<lb/> | |||
the Hulks, every appeared dissatisfied. It was<lb/> | |||
<add>to be the question of every body. It was</add> natural enough therefore that the Duke and his advisers<lb/> | |||
should be of that same opinion, because to <add>he<lb/> | |||
who is</add> be of the same opinion with every body, requires no <add>stands excused<lb/> | |||
from thinking</add> thought. What is legal, what is parliamentary<lb/> | |||
<add>as inquiries considerations</add> – is beneath the enquiry of <add>the duke of Portland</add> M<hi rend="superscript">r</hi> Baldwin and M<hi rend="superscript">r</hi> King. They set up their <add>He sets up his</add> own third mode of disposing<lb/> | |||
of convicts not only against the third mode<lb/> | |||
required by Parliament to be provided (the Penitentiary<lb/> | |||
establishment) but against one of the two modes<lb/> | |||
actually provided by Parliament – <del>the</del> Confinement<lb/> | |||
on board the Hulks. For the reason – in support <add>favour</add><lb/> | |||
of which they are <add>he is</add> so decided and so warm –<lb/> | |||
<del>applies a</del> is not <add>more</add> <unclear>decisive</unclear> against <del>confinement</del><lb/> | |||
confinement in the Penitentiary House, than it is against<lb/> | |||
confinement on board the Hulks. The proposition<lb/> | |||
<add>is –</add></p> | |||
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{ | {{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Ready_For_Review}} | ||
4 Apr. 1802
Dispensing power
It is truly a curious to observe with how profound
a contempt the wisdom of Parliament is treated by
the wisdom of Mr Baldwin and Mr King. Of the
three two strictly legal modes of disposing of Convicts
Transportation to N.S. Wales and confinement on
board the Hulks, there seems seemed some ground for supposing
that Parliament at the time of passing the
Act for the Penitentiary establishment was not perfectly
well satisfied with either, since it passed the Act by the Act it
provided for that third mode. With the That the mode of confinement on board
the Hulks, every appeared dissatisfied. It was
to be the question of every body. It was natural enough therefore that the Duke and his advisers
should be of that same opinion, because to he
who is be of the same opinion with every body, requires no stands excused
from thinking thought. What is legal, what is parliamentary
as inquiries considerations – is beneath the enquiry of the duke of Portland Mr Baldwin and Mr King. They set up their He sets up his own third mode of disposing
of convicts not only against the third mode
required by Parliament to be provided (the Penitentiary
establishment) but against one of the two modes
actually provided by Parliament – the Confinement
on board the Hulks. For the reason – in support favour
of which they are he is so decided and so warm –
applies a is not more decisive against confinement
confinement in the Penitentiary House, than it is against
confinement on board the Hulks. The proposition
is –
|
Identifier: | JB/121/447/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 121. |
|||
|---|---|---|---|
|
1802-03-04 |
8 |
||
|
121 |
Panopticon |
||
|
447 |
Dispensing power |
||
|
001 |
|||
|
Text sheet |
1 |
||
|
Recto"Recto" is not in the list (recto, verso) of allowed values for the "Rectoverso" property. |
D6 / E9 / F15 |
||
|
1800 |
|||
|
1800 |
|||
|
001 |
|||
