JB/106/091/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/106/091/001: Difference between revisions

Kdownunder (talk | contribs)
m Protected "JB/106/091/001": ready for review ([Edit=Allow only administrators] (indefinite) [Move=Allow only administrators] (indefinite))
Kdownunder (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 2: Line 2:
'''[{{fullurl:JB/106/091/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
'''[{{fullurl:JB/106/091/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
 
<p><!-- pencil -->1 March 1807</p>
''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
<p>As to <del>the advantage <add>benefit</add> of</del> uniformity, of decision, it<lb/>
 
recommends itself by a natural title to the imagination, the<lb/>
 
advantage <del>of it</del> attended to it is not of a nature of provoke<lb/>
 
dispute.</p>
<p>But though real, it is not intrinsic, for its utility<lb/>
depends on ulterior considerations.</p>
<p>In regard to the rule of action the advantage <add>utility</add> of uniformity depends upon the utility of certainty.</p>
<p>On the certainty of the rule of action.  On the basis <add>endowment</add> of<lb/>
certainty on the part of the law stands <add>rests</add> that of security on<lb/>
the part of the people in the character of Suitors.</p>
<p>Suppose that by a <add>the habitual</add> course of decision becomes habitual<lb/>
to one <add>of three</add> courts the property of a demand <gap/> is given<lb/>
the whole of it to the older of two sons, by that of another<lb/>
Court, the whole to the younger, and by that of the third, divided<lb/>
between them:  no disposition by well being allowed:  and no one<lb/>
<add>of the three</add> Courts having any power of controul over either of the others.<lb/>
Thus we see <add>an ideal</add> a state of confusion no less fatal to <unclear>security</unclear> than<lb/>
the above supposed case of the prevalence of a <gap/> principle.</p>
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Untranscribed}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Ready_For_Review}}

Revision as of 05:08, 14 March 2022

Click Here To Edit

1 March 1807

As to the advantage benefit of uniformity, of decision, it
recommends itself by a natural title to the imagination, the
advantage of it attended to it is not of a nature of provoke
dispute.

But though real, it is not intrinsic, for its utility
depends on ulterior considerations.

In regard to the rule of action the advantage utility of uniformity depends upon the utility of certainty.

On the certainty of the rule of action. On the basis endowment of
certainty on the part of the law stands rests that of security on
the part of the people in the character of Suitors.

Suppose that by a the habitual course of decision becomes habitual
to one of three courts the property of a demand is given
the whole of it to the older of two sons, by that of another
Court, the whole to the younger, and by that of the third, divided
between them: no disposition by well being allowed: and no one
of the three Courts having any power of controul over either of the others.
Thus we see an ideal a state of confusion no less fatal to security than
the above supposed case of the prevalence of a principle.


Identifier: | JB/106/091/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 106.

Date_1

1807-03-01

Marginal Summary Numbering

19-22

Box

106

Main Headings

scotch reform

Folio number

091

Info in main headings field

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

e7

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

iping 1804

Marginals

jeremy bentham

Paper Producer

bernardino rivadavia

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

1804

Notes public

ID Number

34679

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in