JB/106/100/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/106/100/001: Difference between revisions

Kdownunder (talk | contribs)
m Protected "JB/106/100/001": ready for review ([Edit=Allow only administrators] (indefinite) [Move=Allow only administrators] (indefinite))
Kdownunder (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 2: Line 2:
'''[{{fullurl:JB/106/100/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
'''[{{fullurl:JB/106/100/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
 
<p><!-- pencil -->10 March 1807</p>
''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
<p>When in pursuance of any <del><gap/></del> judicial demand a<lb/>
 
decision is pronounced in favour of the plaintiff, adjudging<lb/>
 
a <hi rend="underline">service</hi> to be rendered to him <del>by</del> at the charge of the<lb/>
 
Defendant, a question that commonly remains to be resolved,<lb/>
is – what shall be the quantity of the subject matter<lb/>
of that service:  as, in the case of money, <del>by</del> what<lb/>
shall be the quantity of money paid.  The separation which<lb/>
thus takes place is not matter of accident or caprice, but<lb/>
results naturally out of <add>almost necessarily from</add> the nature of the case.  For it<lb/>
<del>does not</del> follows not by any means that because that precise<lb/>
quantity which the plaintiff demands is not due to<lb/>
him, therefore nothing at all is due to him – and to<lb/>
require that when the first demand is <del><gap/></del> deemed too great,<lb/>
that demand having thereupon been repelled, shall be followed<lb/>
by demand upon <add>after</add> demand (in the manner of the Dutch substitute<lb/>
for Auction) would be to <gap/> delay vexation<lb/>
and expence in prodigious waste.</p>
<p>In the nature of things whatsoever is susceptible of <hi rend="underline">quantity</hi>,<lb/>
and that quantity subject <add>susceptible</add> to <hi rend="underline">variation</hi>, is thus capable<lb/>
of being made the subject of <hi rend="underline">liquidation</hi>:  money, moveable<lb/>
property such as corn, wine, and oil:  and land.  But<lb/>
under <add>English</add> Jury trial <add>in English law</add>, the only article which ever becomes the subject<lb/>
of liquidation, at least of liquidation made by the Jury, is<lb/>
money.  <del>The</del> So far as moveable property is concerned, the <hi rend="underline">reason</hi><lb/>
(meaning nothing more than the <hi rend="underline">cause</hi>) is altogether curious.<lb/>
The Common Law <add>Courts</add> affording no means of recovery<lb/>
for corn, wine, oil or in a word for any one thing moveable that<lb/>
exists, hence the quantity of it never becomes (before the Jury at<lb/>
least) the subject <add>matter</add> of liquidation.</p>
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Untranscribed}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Ready_For_Review}}

Revision as of 01:25, 16 March 2022

Click Here To Edit

10 March 1807

When in pursuance of any judicial demand a
decision is pronounced in favour of the plaintiff, adjudging
a service to be rendered to him by at the charge of the
Defendant, a question that commonly remains to be resolved,
is – what shall be the quantity of the subject matter
of that service: as, in the case of money, by what
shall be the quantity of money paid. The separation which
thus takes place is not matter of accident or caprice, but
results naturally out of almost necessarily from the nature of the case. For it
does not follows not by any means that because that precise
quantity which the plaintiff demands is not due to
him, therefore nothing at all is due to him – and to
require that when the first demand is deemed too great,
that demand having thereupon been repelled, shall be followed
by demand upon after demand (in the manner of the Dutch substitute
for Auction) would be to delay vexation
and expence in prodigious waste.

In the nature of things whatsoever is susceptible of quantity,
and that quantity subject susceptible to variation, is thus capable
of being made the subject of liquidation: money, moveable
property such as corn, wine, and oil: and land. But
under English Jury trial in English law, the only article which ever becomes the subject
of liquidation, at least of liquidation made by the Jury, is
money. The So far as moveable property is concerned, the reason
(meaning nothing more than the cause) is altogether curious.
The Common Law Courts affording no means of recovery
for corn, wine, oil or in a word for any one thing moveable that
exists, hence the quantity of it never becomes (before the Jury at
least) the subject matter of liquidation.


Identifier: | JB/106/100/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 106.

Date_1

1807-03-10

Marginal Summary Numbering

25-28

Box

106

Main Headings

scotch reform

Folio number

100

Info in main headings field

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

c15 / e15

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

iping 1804

Marginals

jeremy bentham

Paper Producer

bernardino rivadavia

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

1804

Notes public

ID Number

34688

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in