★ Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts
m Protected "JB/052/430/001": ready for review ([Edit=Allow only administrators] (indefinite) [Move=Allow only administrators] (indefinite)) |
No edit summary |
||
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
<head>1825. <sic> | <head>1825. <sic>Jan<hi rend="superscript">y.</hi></sic> 22<lb/>Procedure Code</head> <!-- some in pencil --> <p>2<lb/><note><sic>Ch.</sic> IX <add><sic>Ch.</sic> VII</add> Ulterior proceedings</note><lb/>(1 <note>§. Suit against <gap/><lb/>Defendant <gap/></note></p> <p><note>4<lb/>Advantage of<lb/>conjunction</note></p> <p>Advantages from this conjunction when it has place on<lb/>the Pursuer's side <del><gap/></del> alone are as follows.</p> <p><note>I to Pursuer — Security<lb/>obtainable for eventual<lb/>satisfaction</note></p> <p>1. He may obtain at once the security sufficient for the<lb/>eventual obtainment of satisfaction in respect of all of<lb/>them: whereas if admitted <add>to adduce them</add> no otherwise than successfully<lb/>the result might be that after obtaining adequate security<lb/>in respect of the first security in respect of all the rest<lb/>might vanish and be lost.</p> <p><note>5<lb/>II to Defendant — 1<lb/>Knowledge of the whole<lb/>extent of his responsibility<lb/>2 facility of making cross<lb/>demands</note></p> <p>II. Advantage to the Defendant</p> <p>1. By <add>his</add> hearing and viewing at once the whole extent of his<lb/>responsibility, his mind might in so far, to wit, as against <add>in relation to</add><lb/>all demands from that individual be comparatively at ease<lb/>he would see in its whole extent the <sic>burthen</sic> capable of<lb/>being imposed upon him the <sic>burthen</sic> for his <unclear>exoneration</unclear> from<lb/>which he could have to <unclear>provide</unclear></p> <p><add>2. In case of cross demand, the Defendant would have no<lb/>more to do than to pay or perform the difference between instead of paying<lb/>or performing the whole in the first instance, <del>self</del> with respect to which <!-- continues into the margin --> he might perhaps be<lb/>unable: and if <del><gap/></del><lb/>subject to the accident<lb/>of not being able to<lb/>obtain the effect of<lb/>his demand against<lb/>the <del>Pl</del> Pursuer</add></p> <p><note>6<lb/>III to both parties —<lb/>1 the same attendances</note></p> <p>III. Advantage mutual to both Parties<lb/>1. The same attendances thence the same journeys from home to<lb/>the Judicatory might serve: and would serve for any number<lb/>of demands and cross demands</p> <p><note>7<lb/>IV So to non litigants</note></p> <p>Non litigant<lb/>IV. Advantage to third person in the <unclear>character</unclear> of Witnesses.<lb/>1. In the same manner as in the case of <add>the</add> parties, a single<lb/>attendance might serve instead of two or more attendances.<lb/>so in the situation of missionary judicial <unclear>function</unclear> a single act<lb/>of <sic>acceration,</sic> or prehension, personal or real, instead of two<lb/>or more.</p> | ||
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{ | {{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Ready_For_Review}} |
1825. Jany. 22
Procedure Code
2
Ch. IX Ch. VII Ulterior proceedings
(1 §. Suit against
Defendant
4
Advantage of
conjunction
Advantages from this conjunction when it has place on
the Pursuer's side alone are as follows.
I to Pursuer — Security
obtainable for eventual
satisfaction
1. He may obtain at once the security sufficient for the
eventual obtainment of satisfaction in respect of all of
them: whereas if admitted to adduce them no otherwise than successfully
the result might be that after obtaining adequate security
in respect of the first security in respect of all the rest
might vanish and be lost.
5
II to Defendant — 1
Knowledge of the whole
extent of his responsibility
2 facility of making cross
demands
II. Advantage to the Defendant
1. By his hearing and viewing at once the whole extent of his
responsibility, his mind might in so far, to wit, as against in relation to
all demands from that individual be comparatively at ease
he would see in its whole extent the burthen capable of
being imposed upon him the burthen for his exoneration from
which he could have to provide
2. In case of cross demand, the Defendant would have no
more to do than to pay or perform the difference between instead of paying
or performing the whole in the first instance, self with respect to which he might perhaps be
unable: and if
subject to the accident
of not being able to
obtain the effect of
his demand against
the Pl Pursuer
6
III to both parties —
1 the same attendances
III. Advantage mutual to both Parties
1. The same attendances thence the same journeys from home to
the Judicatory might serve: and would serve for any number
of demands and cross demands
7
IV So to non litigants
Non litigant
IV. Advantage to third person in the character of Witnesses.
1. In the same manner as in the case of the parties, a single
attendance might serve instead of two or more attendances.
so in the situation of missionary judicial function a single act
of acceration, or prehension, personal or real, instead of two
or more.
Identifier: | JB/052/430/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 52. |
|||
---|---|---|---|
1825-01-22 |
4-7 |
||
052 |
procedure code |
||
430 |
procedure code |
||
001 |
|||
text sheet |
1 |
||
recto |
d2 / e1 |
||
jeremy bentham |
j whatman turkey mill 1824 |
||
jonathan blenman |
|||
1824 |
|||
17103 |
|||