JB/106/113/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/106/113/001: Difference between revisions

Kdownunder (talk | contribs)
m Protected "JB/106/113/001": ready for review ([Edit=Allow only administrators] (indefinite) [Move=Allow only administrators] (indefinite))
Kdownunder (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 10: Line 10:
of like natural strength and alike used to reflection is alike<lb/>
of like natural strength and alike used to reflection is alike<lb/>
competent to judge of it.</p>
competent to judge of it.</p>
 
<p><del>In the case</del> For otherwise is it in the case where the<lb/>
 
rule of action is in the state of jurisprudential law.  Jurisprudential<lb/>
law is throughout the whole shapeless mass of it an<lb/>
imposture.  No legislator:  not a word in it that is the word<lb/>
of any man who is so much as pretended to have written<lb/>
in the character of a legislator – Yet words alas! these are<lb/>
in it, and but too many.  Where are these words? the<lb/>
words attributed by <del>some</del> <add>this or that</add> Reporter to <del><gap/> I</del> this or that Judge,<lb/>
<del>are</del> as having been employed by him on the occasion of<lb/>
pronouncing of a <add>his concurring in the</add> decision on this or that individual case:<lb/>
or the words of some <hi rend="underline">Compiler</hi>, as employed by him in<lb/>
<del>your</del> the endeavour to give a general idea of the <del>grounds</del><lb/>
considerations serving <add>that may have served</add> as grounds of decison for the decisions<lb/>
pronounced in the class of cases which he undertakes to treat of.</p>
<p>Thus for example in <add>For example take again</add> the case of the word <hi rend="underline">form</hi>.  <del>In the</del> Look<lb/>
for it in the most determinate source of information, the accustomed<lb/>
forms of pleadings, you find it means nothing at all;<lb/>
as in the case of <hi rend="underline">adultery</hi>, a transgression by consent, never<lb/>
committed, if the <del>manufacturers of</del> mendacity manufacturers<lb/>
are to be believed, without "<hi rend="underline">form</hi>" and "arms" into the bargain:</p>
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{In_Progress}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Ready_For_Review}}

Revision as of 02:34, 17 March 2022

Click Here To Edit

9 March 1807

There it is that every question of law is a question
concerning the import of some word used almost always of a general nature, consigned to wording,
and conceived considered as forming part and parcel of the law.

In the case where the rule of action is in the state of
statutory law, this conception is true the assumption agrees with the truth of things: and every mind
of like natural strength and alike used to reflection is alike
competent to judge of it.

In the case For otherwise is it in the case where the
rule of action is in the state of jurisprudential law. Jurisprudential
law is throughout the whole shapeless mass of it an
imposture. No legislator: not a word in it that is the word
of any man who is so much as pretended to have written
in the character of a legislator – Yet words alas! these are
in it, and but too many. Where are these words? the
words attributed by some this or that Reporter to I this or that Judge,
are as having been employed by him on the occasion of
pronouncing of a his concurring in the decision on this or that individual case:
or the words of some Compiler, as employed by him in
your the endeavour to give a general idea of the grounds
considerations serving that may have served as grounds of decison for the decisions
pronounced in the class of cases which he undertakes to treat of.

Thus for example in For example take again the case of the word form. In the Look
for it in the most determinate source of information, the accustomed
forms of pleadings, you find it means nothing at all;
as in the case of adultery, a transgression by consent, never
committed, if the manufacturers of mendacity manufacturers
are to be believed, without "form" and "arms" into the bargain:


Identifier: | JB/106/113/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 106.

Date_1

1807-03-09

Marginal Summary Numbering

7-10

Box

106

Main Headings

scotch reform

Folio number

113

Info in main headings field

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

c9 / e4

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

iping 1804

Marginals

jeremy bentham

Paper Producer

bernardino rivadavia

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

1804

Notes public

ID Number

34701

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in