JB/106/115/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/106/115/001: Difference between revisions

BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Kdownunder (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 2: Line 2:
'''[{{fullurl:JB/106/115/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
'''[{{fullurl:JB/106/115/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
 
<p><!-- pencil -->9 March 1807</p>
''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
<p>In the penning of real law, the <del>words</del> study of the real<lb/>
 
legislator naturally is as it ought to be, so to choose his<lb/>
 
words that the questions of law arising out of them shall be<lb/>
 
as few as possible.  It is for this purpose that except for<lb/>
the purpose of abbreviation, as above mentioned, he will never<lb/>
lose sight of his congenial objects <add>endeavours</add> – on every occasion to<lb/>
employ such words as are in most common use with the people<lb/>
whose fate they dispose of, and never to employ them in <add>use them as affix to them</add> any<lb/>
other way than <del>its</del> that in which the people understand and<lb/>
use them.</p>
<p>Correspondent to this care <add>study</add> on the part of the real legislator<lb/>
though by the rule of contraries, has been in his character of<lb/>
pseudo-legislator, the study of the English Judge.  Magnifying<lb/>
the Jury brand in words <add>outward <gap/></add>, undermining it in practice, denying<lb/>
in the <unclear>bulk</unclear> of uninterrupted experience the right of Juries to decide<lb/>
the question of law, <del><gap/></del> <gap/> to himself the exclusive<lb/>
cognizance of all questions of law – of all questions grounded<lb/>
in words of law, he takes for <add><gap/> not</add> a word of law, a source<lb/>
of question of law, <del>which</del> words of all sorts as many as<lb/>
the language furnishes.  Words <del>of his own making answer his</del> <add>made by the partnership, and in</add><lb/>
<del>purpose well:  words</del> case nowhere but in the partnership answer<lb/>
this <add>his</add> purpose well:  words in common use and in the most common<lb/>
use answer it still better.  Law jargon produces manifest<lb/>
obscurity <add>serves as a bugbear,</add> and forces men  <del>for advan</del> into the arms of the<lb/>
partnership <add>for advice</add> by the <del>tor</del> <gap/> of falling under the <unclear>task</unclear> of the law<lb/>
and by the sense of dependence produced by conscious ignorance.<lb/>
Ordinary language, <unclear>prisoned</unclear> <add>infected</add> by passing through legal <add><gap/></add> hands, answers<lb/>
the better purpose of a snare, and <add>thus</add> inveigles them into transgression,<lb/>
that <unclear>vast</unclear> their <gap/> the partnership may extract its <unclear>profit</unclear>.</p>
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Untranscribed}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{In_Progress}}

Revision as of 03:19, 17 March 2022

Click Here To Edit

9 March 1807

In the penning of real law, the words study of the real
legislator naturally is as it ought to be, so to choose his
words that the questions of law arising out of them shall be
as few as possible. It is for this purpose that except for
the purpose of abbreviation, as above mentioned, he will never
lose sight of his congenial objects endeavours – on every occasion to
employ such words as are in most common use with the people
whose fate they dispose of, and never to employ them in use them as affix to them any
other way than its that in which the people understand and
use them.

Correspondent to this care study on the part of the real legislator
though by the rule of contraries, has been in his character of
pseudo-legislator, the study of the English Judge. Magnifying
the Jury brand in words outward , undermining it in practice, denying
in the bulk of uninterrupted experience the right of Juries to decide
the question of law, to himself the exclusive
cognizance of all questions of law – of all questions grounded
in words of law, he takes for not a word of law, a source
of question of law, which words of all sorts as many as
the language furnishes. Words of his own making answer his made by the partnership, and in
purpose well: words case nowhere but in the partnership answer
this his purpose well: words in common use and in the most common
use answer it still better. Law jargon produces manifest
obscurity serves as a bugbear, and forces men for advan into the arms of the
partnership for advice by the tor of falling under the task of the law
and by the sense of dependence produced by conscious ignorance.
Ordinary language, prisoned infected by passing through legal hands, answers
the better purpose of a snare, and thus inveigles them into transgression,
that vast their the partnership may extract its profit.


Identifier: | JB/106/115/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 106.

Date_1

1807-03-09

Marginal Summary Numbering

13-14

Box

106

Main Headings

scotch reform

Folio number

115

Info in main headings field

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

c11 / e6

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

Marginals

jeremy bentham

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

34703

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in