JB/106/383/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/106/383/001: Difference between revisions

BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Kdownunder (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 2: Line 2:
'''[{{fullurl:JB/106/383/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
'''[{{fullurl:JB/106/383/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
 
<p>1823. March 2.</p>
''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
<p>In regard to marriage, there seems to be no <unclear>reason</unclear> why a<lb/>
 
man of the <gap/> should <add>in future</add> be allowed <add>to keep under <del>his <gap/></del> the bonds of that contract</add> more women than one.<lb/>
 
In <del>the</del> <add>a</add> limitation of this kind there will be no <gap/> of religious<lb/>
 
liberty <add>by</add> the Koran <del><gap/></del> the having more than one is not made<lb/>
matter of obligation:  in a word <del>such plurality</del> <add>the sort of pluralism in question</add> is an injustice,<lb/>
in which, even when <del><gap/></del> <add>Mahometamism</add> reigns, a very<lb/>
small number of men <add>are partakers</add> in <gap/> of the whole.  The first wife<lb/>
should <add>accordingly</add> while living be the only wife.  Over any other course<lb/>
whence a man might engage to live and <del>cohabit</del> <add>cohabit</add> with him,<lb/>
no <unclear>power</unclear> should be allowed to him.</p>
<p>So in regard to succession.  For simplicity sake the<lb/>
<del>course</del> <add>plan of</add> distribution <del>bedded</del> applied to property <del>after</del> <add>upon</add> the death<lb/>
if his possessions should be the same in the case of <unclear>Mr</unclear>  <gap/><lb/>
as in the case of a <gap/>.  <del>In this <gap/> could</del> <add>Neither in this would</add><lb/>
there be any <del><gap/></del> invasion of religious liberty, so long as the <del><gap/></del> <add>power</add><lb/>
were left to a man of the <gap/> to <del>adopt the</del> <add>give to his property by his last</add> will<lb/>
is given to it by the Mahometam law.</p>
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Untranscribed}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{In_Progress}}

Revision as of 04:44, 17 March 2022

Click Here To Edit

1823. March 2.

In regard to marriage, there seems to be no reason why a
man of the should in future be allowed to keep under his the bonds of that contract more women than one.
In the a limitation of this kind there will be no of religious
liberty by the Koran the having more than one is not made
matter of obligation: in a word such plurality the sort of pluralism in question is an injustice,
in which, even when Mahometamism reigns, a very
small number of men are partakers in of the whole. The first wife
should accordingly while living be the only wife. Over any other course
whence a man might engage to live and cohabit cohabit with him,
no power should be allowed to him.

So in regard to succession. For simplicity sake the
course plan of distribution bedded applied to property after upon the death
if his possessions should be the same in the case of Mr
as in the case of a . In this could Neither in this would
there be any invasion of religious liberty, so long as the power
were left to a man of the to adopt the give to his property by his last will
is given to it by the Mahometam law.


Identifier: | JB/106/383/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 106.

Date_1

1823-03-02

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

106

Main Headings

constitutional code

Folio number

383

Info in main headings field

greece. jb's observations on particular articles

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

d56 / e3 / f57

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

Marginals

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

34971

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in