JB/106/123/001

Click Here To Edit

7 March 1807

I. First as to the shapes in which injustice, considered
as resulting from the conduct of a Judge, is liable to manifest
itself. On Three may be considered as corresponding
to the several ends of justice, so often spoken of. So many
of those ends, so many primary dictates of justice. On the
part of any Judge or Court of Justice an act of injustice
will be an act operating or tending as to operate in violation repugnancy
of to some one or other or every one of those dictates ends; – in violation
of some or other or every one of those dictates.

1. Direct or positive end of justice – po fulfilment of effect given to the arrangements
made the by the substantive branch of the law: support and effect given
to the rights created and conferred by it – the enforcement given
to the conf obligations imposed by it in correspondence with
those rights: fulfilment given to the predictions delivered by
it, and engagements taken by it, in correspondence with those
rights and obligations.

Modifications of judicial injustice in judicature corresponding to this
direct end of justice – 1. Misdecision; or denial of justice
to the prejudice of the Plaintiff's side: 2. Denial of justice. The
relation in the way of coincidence and distraction by these objects
will be presently brought to view.

2. Collateral ultimate a negative or negative end of justice – avoiding to produce give birth to that
sort of vexation which takes place, where in the endeavour
or on the pretence real or pretended, to – give fulfilment to some
article of substantive law in favour of the plaintiff by giving effect
to some right claimed demanded by him as his due, in but really not his due, the correspondent
obligation is imposed upon his adversary, the defendant.

Modification of injustice in judicature corresponding to this collateral
ultimate end of justice, misdecision to the prejudice of the
plaint Defendant's side.

3. Collateral incidental end or ends of justice – (likewise of the negative cast –)
avoiding to give birth to superabundant collateral inconvenience
in its several distinguishable but intimately connected shapes – delay,
vexation and expence.

Modification or modifications of injustice in judicature, corresponding
to this collateral incidental end of justice, production of superabundant delay, vexation
or expence.

Identifier: | JB/106/123/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 106.
Date_1	1807-03-07	Marginal Summary Numbering	5
Box	106	Main Headings	scotch reform
Folio number	123	Info in main headings field
Image	001	Titles
Category	text sheet	Number of Pages	1
Recto/Verso	recto	Page Numbering	e2
Penner	jeremy bentham	Watermarks	iping 1804
Marginals	jeremy bentham	Paper Producer	bernardino rivadavia
Corrections		Paper Produced in Year	1804
Notes public		ID Number	34711
Box Contents