JB/106/185/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/106/185/001: Difference between revisions

Kdownunder (talk | contribs)
m Protected "JB/106/185/001": ready for review ([Edit=Allow only administrators] (indefinite) [Move=Allow only administrators] (indefinite))
Kdownunder (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 2: Line 2:
'''[{{fullurl:JB/106/185/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
'''[{{fullurl:JB/106/185/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
 
<p><!-- pencil -->16 May 1807</p>
''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
<p>3.  The immediate cause seems to be discoverable in this<lb/>
 
circumstance.  The only way in which the attention<lb/>
 
of the supreme superintending authority has <add>commonly</add> been called to<lb/>
 
<del>instances of supposed <add>alledged</add></del> the decision <add>or proceeding</add> of a superordinate<lb/>
Court has been the way of <hi rend="underline">appeal</hi>:  whether characterized<lb/>
by that same word or by some other synonymous to it in<lb/>
effect.  The effect of <add>an</add> <hi rend="underline">appeal</hi> is to draw <add>point</add> the attention<lb/>
of the superintending authority to the particular decision appealed<lb/>
from – to the particular suit in <add>the course of</add> which that decision was<lb/>
pronounced:  but beyond that <add>individual</add> suit or even <add>so much as</add> beyond the<lb/>
particular decision <add>of</add> which the appeal complains on the occasion<lb/>
of that suit, the attention thus called for and bestowed<lb/>
on the part of the superintending authority has never<lb/>
<gap/> <add>extended</add>, but never at least received any extension<lb/>
from this source.</p>
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Untranscribed}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Ready_For_Review}}

Revision as of 04:27, 23 March 2022

Click Here To Edit

16 May 1807

3. The immediate cause seems to be discoverable in this
circumstance. The only way in which the attention
of the supreme superintending authority has commonly been called to
instances of supposed alledged the decision or proceeding of a superordinate
Court has been the way of appeal: whether characterized
by that same word or by some other synonymous to it in
effect. The effect of an appeal is to draw point the attention
of the superintending authority to the particular decision appealed
from – to the particular suit in the course of which that decision was
pronounced: but beyond that individual suit or even so much as beyond the
particular decision of which the appeal complains on the occasion
of that suit, the attention thus called for and bestowed
on the part of the superintending authority has never
extended, but never at least received any extension
from this source.


Identifier: | JB/106/185/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 106.

Date_1

1807-05-16

Marginal Summary Numbering

7

Box

106

Main Headings

scotch reform

Folio number

185

Info in main headings field

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

c5

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

iping 1804

Marginals

jeremy bentham

Paper Producer

bernardino rivadavia

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

1804

Notes public

ID Number

34773

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in