JB/106/190/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/106/190/001: Difference between revisions

Kdownunder (talk | contribs)
m Protected "JB/106/190/001": ready for review ([Edit=Allow only administrators] (indefinite) [Move=Allow only administrators] (indefinite))
Kdownunder (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 2: Line 2:
'''[{{fullurl:JB/106/190/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
'''[{{fullurl:JB/106/190/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
 
<p><!-- pencil -->16 May 1807</p>
''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
<p>Thus stands the matter of individual responsibility,<lb/>
 
in that comparatively narrow department of the field of law<lb/>
 
and legislature which is characterized <add>brought to view</add> by the word <hi rend="underline">finance</hi>.<lb/>
 
But to <add>upon</add> no other quarter does any such responsibility extend <add>attach</add>:<lb/>
not to the criminal department for instance <add>example</add>, not to the<lb/>
civil.</p>
<p>Both these portions of the demesne <add>domain</add> of legislature are<lb/>
understood to appertain in common to the community<lb/>
of lawyers:  to appertain to them, and to be possessed by<lb/>
them upon the most convenient of all terms – power without<lb/>
responsibility – power without obligation.</p>
<p>To <add><unclear>be</unclear> no</add> one of them is any sort of duty political or<lb/>
so much as moral, supposed to be incumbent, on the<lb/>
ground of <unclear>these</unclear> as any other branches of the law.  To no one<lb/>
of them all any more than to any other individual upon<lb/>
earth, is any member of the legislature, much less any <add>earth in the <gap/> of any deficiency or other imperfection howsoever <del>fro</del> palpable, on the occasion of any abuse or corruption, howsoever flagrant</add><lb/>
individual at large, concerned as having a right to address<lb/>
himself for the purpose of saying, why, you being where you<lb/>
are, are these things so?  These imperfections these abuses<lb/>
these corruptions these mischiefs injury, why is it that<lb/>
nothing on your part has been done or proposed to remedy<lb/>
them?</p>
<p>If in either assembly of the legislature there were any<lb/>
Member to whom with propriety and <unclear>assurance</unclear> of right any<lb/>
such question could be put <add>address could be made</add>, it would be <add>I suppose</add> the Lords High Chancellor,<lb/>
the person in whom custody the Great Seal is, on the<lb/>
supposition of his being a Member, as for apt part he almost<lb/>
always has been, of the House of Lords.  But in bringing<lb/>
to view the idea of a responsibility of this sort as attached to the<lb/>
functions of that high office, I bring to view at the same time the<lb/>
negative which every reader I suppose will<lb/>
be ready to put upon it at the first word.</p>
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Untranscribed}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Ready_For_Review}}

Revision as of 02:03, 24 March 2022

Click Here To Edit

16 May 1807

Thus stands the matter of individual responsibility,
in that comparatively narrow department of the field of law
and legislature which is characterized brought to view by the word finance.
But to upon no other quarter does any such responsibility extend attach:
not to the criminal department for instance example, not to the
civil.

Both these portions of the demesne domain of legislature are
understood to appertain in common to the community
of lawyers: to appertain to them, and to be possessed by
them upon the most convenient of all terms – power without
responsibility – power without obligation.

To be no one of them is any sort of duty political or
so much as moral, supposed to be incumbent, on the
ground of these as any other branches of the law. To no one
of them all any more than to any other individual upon
earth, is any member of the legislature, much less any earth in the of any deficiency or other imperfection howsoever fro palpable, on the occasion of any abuse or corruption, howsoever flagrant
individual at large, concerned as having a right to address
himself for the purpose of saying, why, you being where you
are, are these things so? These imperfections these abuses
these corruptions these mischiefs injury, why is it that
nothing on your part has been done or proposed to remedy
them?

If in either assembly of the legislature there were any
Member to whom with propriety and assurance of right any
such question could be put address could be made, it would be I suppose the Lords High Chancellor,
the person in whom custody the Great Seal is, on the
supposition of his being a Member, as for apt part he almost
always has been, of the House of Lords. But in bringing
to view the idea of a responsibility of this sort as attached to the
functions of that high office, I bring to view at the same time the
negative which every reader I suppose will
be ready to put upon it at the first word.


Identifier: | JB/106/190/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 106.

Date_1

1807-05-16

Marginal Summary Numbering

17-20

Box

106

Main Headings

scotch reform

Folio number

190

Info in main headings field

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

c10

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

iping 1804

Marginals

jeremy bentham

Paper Producer

bernardino rivadavia

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

1804

Notes public

ID Number

34778

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in