JB/106/193/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/106/193/001: Difference between revisions

Kdownunder (talk | contribs)
m Protected "JB/106/193/001": ready for review ([Edit=Allow only administrators] (indefinite) [Move=Allow only administrators] (indefinite))
Kdownunder (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 2: Line 2:
'''[{{fullurl:JB/106/193/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
'''[{{fullurl:JB/106/193/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
 
<p><!-- pencil -->16 May 1807</p>
''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
<p>Hence it was <add>is</add> my Lord <add>for example</add> that when for the purpose<lb/>
 
of the day a mass of documents was called for – and<lb/>
 
that mass incompleat, and by its incompleatness fallacious<lb/>
 
and by its fallaciousness <add>fallacy</add> inurious, injurious to the judicature<lb/>
of our sister kingdom – no English lawyer of the<lb/>
many by whom your Lordship was encompassed – neither<lb/>
meaning the advocates, nor yet among the opponents of the<lb/>
measure, could prevail upon himself to speak a word<lb/>
towards the filling up of that injurious gap <add>deficiency</add> of the existence<lb/>
every <add>no</add> lawyer, unless rendered stark blind by <gap/><lb/>
could have escaped <add>avoided</add> from being fully sensible.  Silence<lb/>
inaction, negative conduct is all I can here speak of.<lb/>
But being much known by those documents that make themselves<lb/>
known to all of us.  As to any <add>positive and</add> active <del><gap/><lb/>
for</del> exertion employed for the purpose of supposition,<lb/>
every thing of that sort, if any thing of that sort there has<lb/>
been is <del>covered</del> wrapped up in <add>well-suited</add> darkness, and bids defiance<lb/>
to all such scrutiny as mine.</p>
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Untranscribed}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Ready_For_Review}}

Revision as of 02:40, 24 March 2022

Click Here To Edit

16 May 1807

Hence it was is my Lord for example that when for the purpose
of the day a mass of documents was called for – and
that mass incompleat, and by its incompleatness fallacious
and by its fallaciousness fallacy inurious, injurious to the judicature
of our sister kingdom – no English lawyer of the
many by whom your Lordship was encompassed – neither
meaning the advocates, nor yet among the opponents of the
measure, could prevail upon himself to speak a word
towards the filling up of that injurious gap deficiency of the existence
every no lawyer, unless rendered stark blind by
could have escaped avoided from being fully sensible. Silence
inaction, negative conduct is all I can here speak of.
But being much known by those documents that make themselves
known to all of us. As to any positive and active
for
exertion employed for the purpose of supposition,
every thing of that sort, if any thing of that sort there has
been is covered wrapped up in well-suited darkness, and bids defiance
to all such scrutiny as mine.


Identifier: | JB/106/193/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 106.

Date_1

1807-05-16

Marginal Summary Numbering

26

Box

106

Main Headings

scotch reform

Folio number

193

Info in main headings field

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

c13

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

Marginals

jeremy bentham

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

34781

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in