JB/042/189/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/042/189/001: Difference between revisions

BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Keithompson (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 3: Line 3:
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
<p>1826. June 30</p>
<head>Constitutional Code.</head>
 
<note>Ch. XII. Judication collateral<lb/>
<del>Ch. IX Minister collectively</del><lb/>
&sect;.1. Excepted Judicatories<lb/>
S. <del>Oppression obviated</del></note><lb/>
 
<note><!-- In pencil -->III. <add>Quasi</add> Resubordination</note><lb/>
 
<note>Art 6 Chief difference<lb/>
between this &amp; ordinary<lb/>
judicatories <add>in</add> the natural<lb/>
degree of natural promptitude<lb/>
&amp; in Judge's situation</note><lb/>
 
Art 6 In the case of this sort of Excepted Judicatory preceding,<lb/>
will not be <gap/>ably different from those of the ordinary<lb/>
judicator, for the most apt modes <add>best adopted means</add> of coming <gap/> the truth<lb/>
in regard to the relevant facts <add>as well</add> are the same <add>in every case</add> in relation to <lb/>
every sort of act.  The only change will be that which respects<lb/>
the <add><del>degree of</del> <gap/> natural</add> <del>class of functionaries</del> degree of natural promptitude, and<lb/>
that which regards the situation of the temporary Judge. The time<lb/>
when <add>by which</add>  a Judge whose situation<add>sent</add> is at a considerable and <unclear>indeterment</unclear><lb/>
can be called in case not be wanted for, and the ordinary Judge<lb/>
having little or no acquaintance will the<add>details of the</add> business of the office in<lb/>
question would probably be in the first instance, in respect of<lb/>
 






<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Untranscribed}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{In_Progress}}

Revision as of 10:41, 24 March 2022

Click Here To Edit

1826. June 30

Constitutional Code.

Ch. XII. Judication collateral
Ch. IX Minister collectively
§.1. Excepted Judicatories
S. Oppression obviated

III. Quasi Resubordination

Art 6 Chief difference
between this & ordinary
judicatories in the natural
degree of natural promptitude
& in Judge's situation

Art 6 In the case of this sort of Excepted Judicatory preceding,
will not be ably different from those of the ordinary
judicator, for the most apt modes best adopted means of coming the truth
in regard to the relevant facts as well are the same in every case in relation to
every sort of act. The only change will be that which respects
the degree of natural class of functionaries degree of natural promptitude, and
that which regards the situation of the temporary Judge. The time
when by which a Judge whose situationsent is at a considerable and indeterment
can be called in case not be wanted for, and the ordinary Judge
having little or no acquaintance will thedetails of the business of the office in
question would probably be in the first instance, in respect of




Identifier: | JB/042/189/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 42.

Date_1

1826-06-30

Marginal Summary Numbering

1-3

Box

042

Main Headings

constitutional code

Folio number

189

Info in main headings field

constitutional code

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

c6 / c2

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

Marginals

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

13112

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in