★ Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 23: | Line 23: | ||
judicator, for the most apt modes <add>best adopted means</add> of coming <gap/> the truth<lb/> | judicator, for the most apt modes <add>best adopted means</add> of coming <gap/> the truth<lb/> | ||
in regard to the relevant facts <add>as well</add> are the same <add>in every case</add> in relation to <lb/> | in regard to the relevant facts <add>as well</add> are the same <add>in every case</add> in relation to <lb/> | ||
every sort of act. The only change will be that which respects<lb/> | every sort of act. The only change will be that which respects <note><hi rend="superscript">[+]</hi> not at all affected<lb/> | ||
by the situation, form <lb/> | |||
and magnitude of<lb/> | |||
the slices of jurisdiction<lb/> | |||
carried out in terms of<lb/> | |||
antient barbar<gap/></note><lb/> | |||
the <add><del>degree of</del> <gap/> natural</add> <del>class of functionaries</del> degree of natural promptitude, and<lb/> | the <add><del>degree of</del> <gap/> natural</add> <del>class of functionaries</del> degree of natural promptitude, and<lb/> | ||
that which regards the situation of the temporary Judge. The time<lb/> | that which regards the situation of the temporary Judge. The time<lb/> | ||
Line 30: | Line 35: | ||
having little or no acquaintance will the<add>details of the</add> business of the office in<lb/> | having little or no acquaintance will the<add>details of the</add> business of the office in<lb/> | ||
question would probably be in the first instance, in respect of<lb/> | question would probably be in the first instance, in respect of<lb/> | ||
cog<gap/> and judicative applied to less apt than the<lb/> | |||
particular <add>special</add> Judge have substituted to him. True it that in<lb/> | |||
the case proposed the <del><gap/></del> <add>cause in which</add> special Judge would not <del><gap/></del> be<lb/> | |||
might without impropriety be termed his own cause. | |||
but the facility of Appeal being in their case as in all | |||
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{In_Progress}} | {{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{In_Progress}} |
1826. June 30
Constitutional Code.
Ch. XII. Judication collateral
Ch. IX Minister collectively
§.1. Excepted Judicatories
S. Oppression obviated
III. Quasi Resubordination
Art 6 Chief difference
between this & ordinary
judicatories in the natural
degree of natural promptitude
& in Judge's situation
Art 6 In the case of this sort of Excepted Judicatory preceding,
will not be ably different from those of the ordinary
judicator, for the most apt modes best adopted means of coming the truth
in regard to the relevant facts as well are the same in every case in relation to
every sort of act. The only change will be that which respects [+] not at all affected
by the situation, form
and magnitude of
the slices of jurisdiction
carried out in terms of
antient barbar
the degree of natural class of functionaries degree of natural promptitude, and
that which regards the situation of the temporary Judge. The time
when by which a Judge whose situationsent is at a considerable and indeterment
can be called in case not be wanted for, and the ordinary Judge
having little or no acquaintance will thedetails of the business of the office in
question would probably be in the first instance, in respect of
cog and judicative applied to less apt than the
particular special Judge have substituted to him. True it that in
the case proposed the cause in which special Judge would not be
might without impropriety be termed his own cause.
but the facility of Appeal being in their case as in all
Identifier: | JB/042/189/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 42. |
|||
---|---|---|---|
1826-06-30 |
1-3 |
||
042 |
constitutional code |
||
189 |
constitutional code |
||
001 |
|||
text sheet |
1 |
||
recto |
c6 / c2 |
||
jeremy bentham |
|||
13112 |
|||