★ Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
<head>1825. <sic>Jan<hi rend="superscript">y</hi></sic> 19<lb/>Procedure Code</head> <!-- some in pencil --> <p>2<lb/><note><sic>Ch.<?sic> VIII <del>Suit simplest</del> Initiation<lb/>hearing</note><lb/>(2 <note>§. <del>State of things afterwards</del></note></p> <p><sic>Art.</sic> continued<lb/> <!-- left marginal numbering and + signs in pencil --> <p><note>4</note> + 9. Such <del>as</del> non penal compensation-seeking: thence proposes<lb/>Defendant being as per <sic>N<hi rend="superscript">o</hi></sic> 7 adequately responsible no extra <add><sic>provisionary</sic></add><lb/>arrangements necessary to be taken as in aa highly penal case for<lb/>securing eventual means of execution and effect.</p> <p><note>3<lb/><sic>Excretitiory suits <gap/><lb/1 <del>Suits</del> For incidental<lb/>mendacity<lb?>2 against bondsmen<lb?>3 against party for<lb/>non compliance<lb/>4 against judicial<lb/>functionaries for non<lb/>compliance oppression or<lb/>extortion</note></p> <p>+ 10. Out of <del>the</del> <add>an</add> originally instituted suit, various sorts of<lb/><sic>excretitious</sic> suits are liable to grow: with <add>on the present occasion</add> no such causes of<lb/>complexity and <gap/> is the suit supposed to be outweighed.</p> <p>+ 11. For the several causes of complexity which independently<lb/>of any suit <sic>excretitious</sic> suits are liable to have place, see<lb/>the preceding Chapter VII.</p> <p>+ 12. Of <sic>excretitious</sic> suits examples are as follows.</p> <p><note>5</note> + 1. Suit against <del>an applic</del> a pursuer, defendant or<lb/>extraneous witness on a charge of <sic>falshood</sic>. <add>Suits for<lb/>incidental mendacity or forgery</add></p> <p><note>6</note> + 2. Suit against the n=bondsman of a pursuer, defendant<lb/>or (in case of witness non attendance of an extraneous witness<lb/>for non compliance on the part of the principal undertaken <lb/>for, or the bondsman.</p> <p><note>7</note> + 3. Suit against a pursuer, defendant or extraneous witness<lb/>for non compliance at large <add>See <sic>Ch.</sic> Judicial compliance<lb/>how producible.</add></p> <p><note>8</note> 4. Suit against a judiciary functionary, <add>official or occasional, if official</add> magistratal or ministerial,<lb/>if ministerial stationary or <gap/> for non-complicnce,<lb/>extortion or oppression on the occasion of the suit.</p> <p><note>9</note> + 13. Of Accidents productive of non-compliance examples<lb?>are as follows<lb/>1. Death of pursuer, ddefendant — extraensous witness, judicial<lb/>functionaryes<lb?>2. Physical inabilityn of <sic>d<hi rend="superscript">o</hi></sic><lb/>3. <del>Loss</del> Destructrion or lsoss definitive or temporary of judicial<lb/>instruments in <del><gap/></del> loco or in transition<lb/> | |||
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{ | {{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{In_Progress}} | ||
1825. Jany 19
Procedure Code
2
<sic>Ch.<?sic> VIII Suit simplest Initiation
hearing
(2 §. State of things afterwards
Art. continued
4 + 9. Such as non penal compensation-seeking: thence proposes
Defendant being as per No 7 adequately responsible no extra provisionary
arrangements necessary to be taken as in aa highly penal case for
securing eventual means of execution and effect.
3
<sic>Excretitiory suits <lb/1 Suits For incidental
mendacity<lb?>2 against bondsmen<lb?>3 against party for
non compliance
4 against judicial
functionaries for non
compliance oppression or
extortion
+ 10. Out of the an originally instituted suit, various sorts of
excretitious suits are liable to grow: with on the present occasion no such causes of
complexity and is the suit supposed to be outweighed.
+ 11. For the several causes of complexity which independently
of any suit excretitious suits are liable to have place, see
the preceding Chapter VII.
+ 12. Of excretitious suits examples are as follows.
5 + 1. Suit against an applic a pursuer, defendant or
extraneous witness on a charge of falshood. Suits for
incidental mendacity or forgery
6 + 2. Suit against the n=bondsman of a pursuer, defendant
or (in case of witness non attendance of an extraneous witness
for non compliance on the part of the principal undertaken
for, or the bondsman.
7 + 3. Suit against a pursuer, defendant or extraneous witness
for non compliance at large See Ch. Judicial compliance
how producible.
8 4. Suit against a judiciary functionary, official or occasional, if official magistratal or ministerial,
if ministerial stationary or for non-complicnce,
extortion or oppression on the occasion of the suit.
9 + 13. Of Accidents productive of non-compliance examples<lb?>are as follows
1. Death of pursuer, ddefendant — extraensous witness, judicial
functionaryes<lb?>2. Physical inabilityn of do
3. Loss Destructrion or lsoss definitive or temporary of judicial
instruments in loco or in transition
|
Identifier: | JB/052/427/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 52. |
|||
|---|---|---|---|
|
1825-01-19 |
3-4 |
||
|
052 |
procedure code |
||
|
427 |
procedure code |
||
|
001 |
|||
|
text sheet |
1 |
||
|
recto |
d2 / e2 |
||
|
jeremy bentham |
j whatman turkey mill 1824 |
||
|
jonathan blenman |
|||
|
1824 |
|||
|
17100 |
|||
