JB/036/010/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/036/010/001: Difference between revisions

Kdownunder (talk | contribs)
m Protected "JB/036/010/001": ready for review ([Edit=Allow only administrators] (indefinite) [Move=Allow only administrators] (indefinite))
Kdownunder (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 2: Line 2:
'''[{{fullurl:JB/036/010/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
'''[{{fullurl:JB/036/010/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
 
<p>1821. April 26.</p>
''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
<p>But as, with the power of granting, the power of refusing<lb/>
 
receives correspondent encrease, so with that love which produces<lb/>
 
gratitude will encrease that fear which produces respect:  not <del>to</del> <add>more</add><lb/>
 
<del>insist that</del> <add>than</add> in the hands of the opulent, with the negative power<lb/>
of refusing favour to those who have not been, and those who<lb/>
have ceased to be, the objects of their <add><del>good liking</del></add> regard is conjoined, in<lb/>
no <del>oth</del> inconsiderable degree, the power of doing positive evil to<lb/>
whose who were the objects of their positive aversion.  By the operation<lb/>
of all these causes taken together, thus intimate is the connection<lb/>
between the idea presented by the word rich, and the idea presented<lb/>
by the word respectable.  Of the effect produced by this association<lb/>
on conduct, discourse and, to no inconsiderable degree, on opinion<lb/>
and affection, an exemplification may be seen in the picture<lb/>
of the parasite as drawn <del>in</del> by the earliest of the Dramatists<lb/>
whose works have reached us.</p>
<p>if such and so great be the ordinary influence and<lb/>
effect of the matter of wealth <del>distributed in</del> in hands of individuals<lb/>
distributed in parcels of an ordinary bulk each, what <lb/>
must it be <del>collected</del> accumulated in an immense mass in company<lb/>
with supreme power and the highest lot of factitious dignity<lb/>
together with the manufactory in which all inferior lots are fabricated<lb/>
– <del>are</del> these instruments of influence all placed in the<lb/>
same hand.  If <add>even were wealth the whole</add> such be the influence of wealth when reckoned<lb/>
by thousands, what must it not be when reckoned by millions.</p>
<p>As long as wealth and Government have had existence,<lb/>
the powers of poetry and oratory have been <del>exhausted</del> <add>employed</add> in singing<lb/>
the praises of the powerful the dignified and the wealthy.  While the<lb/>
effusions of praise have thus had free scope with reward in every<lb/>
shape to pay for them, those of censure have all along and every<lb/>
where been suppressed by every restraint <del>that could be</del> which it<lb/>
was in the power of punishment to apply.</p>
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Untranscribed}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Ready_For_Review}}

Revision as of 05:24, 23 April 2022

Click Here To Edit

1821. April 26.

But as, with the power of granting, the power of refusing
receives correspondent encrease, so with that love which produces
gratitude will encrease that fear which produces respect: not to more
insist that than in the hands of the opulent, with the negative power
of refusing favour to those who have not been, and those who
have ceased to be, the objects of their good liking regard is conjoined, in
no oth inconsiderable degree, the power of doing positive evil to
whose who were the objects of their positive aversion. By the operation
of all these causes taken together, thus intimate is the connection
between the idea presented by the word rich, and the idea presented
by the word respectable. Of the effect produced by this association
on conduct, discourse and, to no inconsiderable degree, on opinion
and affection, an exemplification may be seen in the picture
of the parasite as drawn in by the earliest of the Dramatists
whose works have reached us.

if such and so great be the ordinary influence and
effect of the matter of wealth distributed in in hands of individuals
distributed in parcels of an ordinary bulk each, what
must it be collected accumulated in an immense mass in company
with supreme power and the highest lot of factitious dignity
together with the manufactory in which all inferior lots are fabricated
are these instruments of influence all placed in the
same hand. If even were wealth the whole such be the influence of wealth when reckoned
by thousands, what must it not be when reckoned by millions.

As long as wealth and Government have had existence,
the powers of poetry and oratory have been exhausted employed in singing
the praises of the powerful the dignified and the wealthy. While the
effusions of praise have thus had free scope with reward in every
shape to pay for them, those of censure have all along and every
where been suppressed by every restraint that could be which it
was in the power of punishment to apply.


Identifier: | JB/036/010/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 36.

Date_1

1821-04-26

Marginal Summary Numbering

13-16

Box

036

Main Headings

constitutional code

Folio number

010

Info in main headings field

first lines

Image

001

Titles

Category

copy/fair copy sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

c7 / e6

Penner

john flowerdew colls

Watermarks

Marginals

jeremy bentham

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

10934

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in