★ Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 28: | Line 28: | ||
now has delivered into their hands.</p> | now has delivered into their hands.</p> | ||
<p>Continued into one proposition M<hi rend="superscript">r</hi> Bentham <gap/><lb/> | |||
in relation to the authors of the Common Law <gap/> be then<lb/> | |||
expressed. <hi rend="underline">The</hi> <add><sic><hi rend="underline">compleat</hi></sic></add> <hi rend="underline">inaptitude of</hi> the rule of action in its <unclear>porous</unclear><lb/> | |||
<hi rend="underline">state has had all along for its efficient cause the</hi><add><hi rend="underline">their</hi></add> <hi rend="underline"><gap/></hi><lb/> | |||
<hi rend="underline">interest of Judges.</hi></p> | |||
By M<hi rend="superscript">r</hi> Bentham the truth of this position has been<lb/> | |||
in a variety of reasons demonstrated<add>in th<gap/></add> from the nature of man<lb/> | |||
<del>By M<hi rend="superscript">r</hi> Humphreys form From particular f<gap/>ds</del> From the <lb/> | |||
experience of the whole course of their proceedings as evidenced<lb/> | |||
by fact, by d<gap/> after <gap/> <del><gap/></del> in every page of M<hi rend="superscript">r</hi> <gap/><lb/> | |||
work this same proportion stands demonstrated from expensive<lb/> | |||
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{In_Progress}} | {{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{In_Progress}} |
1826 Aug. 20
Review of Humphrey
§. J.B. & H's language as to Judge
§ Expectation principle
J.B. language in speaking of Judges
As to the manner in which Mr Bentham has for such
a length of time been speaking of the Judges of the land and
the cause and reason of his doing so, it stands then
1
AS a a Judge
J.B. and H.: language
deficient
—
With Towards none of them in induced in any ac
has he any feeing more hes, then any they have one of them when
towards the punishable malefactor when he is accordingly by his
sentence to the hands of the execution But to the purposes of an reform
effectual is the sort of language he employs in speaking of them is not
less necessary than the language which employed by them in speaking
to the malefactor a supposed malefactor when the chance of forensic
now has delivered into their hands.
Continued into one proposition Mr Bentham
in relation to the authors of the Common Law be then
expressed. The compleat inaptitude of the rule of action in its porous
state has had all along for its efficient cause thetheir
interest of Judges.
By Mr Bentham the truth of this position has been
in a variety of reasons demonstratedin th from the nature of man
By Mr Humphreys form From particular fds From the
experience of the whole course of their proceedings as evidenced
by fact, by d after in every page of Mr
work this same proportion stands demonstrated from expensive
Identifier: | JB/078/065/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 78. |
|||
---|---|---|---|
1826-08-20 |
1 |
||
078 |
Review of Humphreys |
||
065 |
Review of Humphreys |
||
001 |
|||
Text sheet |
1 |
||
recto |
C1 / E1 |
||
J WHATMAN TURKEY MILL 1824 |
|||
Jonathan Blenman |
|||
1824 |
|||
25156 |
|||