JB/143/103/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/143/103/001: Difference between revisions

Kdownunder (talk | contribs)
m Protected "JB/143/103/001": ready for review ([Edit=Allow only administrators] (indefinite) [Move=Allow only administrators] (indefinite))
Kdownunder (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 2: Line 2:
'''[{{fullurl:JB/143/103/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
'''[{{fullurl:JB/143/103/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
 
<p>1825 June<lb/>
''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
<head>Rationale of Reward</head><lb/>
 
&sect;.1.  Scale of Ranks</p>
 
<p>Only in so far as applicable in the character of <add>a mass of</add> rewards to the production of official service<lb/>
 
does the institution belong to the present purpose.<lb/>
But, as described by the Imperial founder, no relation<lb/>
does it bear to <add>reward, or to</add> service <del>Grades she found</del> <add><del>supposed</del> regarded as meritorious.  Of this ladder of<lb/>
ambition with its fourteen<lb/>
rounds, the <unclear>model</unclear><lb/>
is that which the<lb/>
<gap/> exemplified in<lb/>
her army</add><lb/>
<del>established in her army</del>:  grades much the same<lb/>
as <add>those</add> in other armies.  But in the two cases, <del>there is</del> <add>in respect</add><lb/>
<del>a</del> <add>of the demand for such gradations, there is</add> little parallelism.  Independently of every such<lb/>
idea as that <add>of</add> remuneration – aggregates one within another,<lb/>
the result of a series of decompositions <add>performed upon the whole and</add> carried<lb/>
on till the smallest aggregate includes no more<lb/>
than five or six individuals, is essential to military<lb/>
service:  every variety, <del><gap/></del> in the number <add>of the individuals acting in a body</add> being on different<lb/>
occasions necessary for every variety of purposes.<lb/>
In it's general description, the purpose for which this<lb/>
decomposibility and recompensibility are necessary,<lb/>
is that of making detachments:  the all-comprehending<lb/>
aggregate being at all times in all it's parts <unclear>moveable</unclear>.<lb/>
Exceptions <del>excepted</del> in a number not worth noticing<lb/>
<add>excepted</add> in the Civil service, every body's station is fixt:<lb/>
no such detachments are made.  No determinate <add>appropriate</add> object,<lb/>
accordingly has the <add>civil</add> ladder of rank with <add>its</add> 14 rounds<lb/>
in it:  for as in the Military, this is the number on<lb/>
the Civil scale.</p>
<p>In the particular here in question,<lb/>
namely in the having nothing to do with <hi rend="underline">individual</hi> service,<lb/>
<add>that is to say with</add> services rendered, <add>or expected to be rendered, on individual occasions</add> by the individuals thus disposed of,<lb/>
the institution agrees with the system of ranks, as established<lb/>
in England early in the 15th Century of Henry<lb/>
the eighth:  Statute of precedency. 31. Hen. 8. Ch. 10.</p>
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Untranscribed}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Ready_For_Review}}

Revision as of 05:50, 27 April 2022

Click Here To Edit

1825 June
Rationale of Reward
§.1. Scale of Ranks

Only in so far as applicable in the character of a mass of rewards to the production of official service
does the institution belong to the present purpose.
But, as described by the Imperial founder, no relation
does it bear to reward, or to service Grades she found supposed regarded as meritorious. Of this ladder of
ambition with its fourteen
rounds, the model
is that which the
exemplified in
her army

established in her army: grades much the same
as those in other armies. But in the two cases, there is in respect
a of the demand for such gradations, there is little parallelism. Independently of every such
idea as that of remuneration – aggregates one within another,
the result of a series of decompositions performed upon the whole and carried
on till the smallest aggregate includes no more
than five or six individuals, is essential to military
service: every variety, in the number of the individuals acting in a body being on different
occasions necessary for every variety of purposes.
In it's general description, the purpose for which this
decomposibility and recompensibility are necessary,
is that of making detachments: the all-comprehending
aggregate being at all times in all it's parts moveable.
Exceptions excepted in a number not worth noticing
excepted in the Civil service, every body's station is fixt:
no such detachments are made. No determinate appropriate object,
accordingly has the civil ladder of rank with its 14 rounds
in it: for as in the Military, this is the number on
the Civil scale.

In the particular here in question,
namely in the having nothing to do with individual service,
that is to say with services rendered, or expected to be rendered, on individual occasions by the individuals thus disposed of,
the institution agrees with the system of ranks, as established
in England early in the 15th Century of Henry
the eighth: Statute of precedency. 31. Hen. 8. Ch. 10.


Identifier: | JB/143/103/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 143.

Date_1

1825-06

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

143

Main Headings

rationale of reward

Folio number

103

Info in main headings field

rationale of reward

Image

001

Titles

Category

copy/fair copy sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

e4

Penner

john flowerdew colls

Watermarks

Marginals

Paper Producer

Corrections

jeremy bentham

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

48736

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in