JB/106/371/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/106/371/001: Difference between revisions

Kdownunder (talk | contribs)
m Protected "JB/106/371/001": ready for review ([Edit=Allow only administrators] (indefinite) [Move=Allow only administrators] (indefinite))
Kdownunder (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 2: Line 2:
'''[{{fullurl:JB/106/371/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
'''[{{fullurl:JB/106/371/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
 
<p>1823. Feb<hi rend="superscript">y.</hi> 28.<lb/>
''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
<!-- pencil --><head>Greece.  J.B's Observations on particular Articles</head></p>
 
<p>But if there were a sort of man on whom a<lb/>
 
note of eminent untrustworthiness should be put for<lb/>
 
the instruction and guidance of a Jury, it should be the<lb/>
hireling advocate.  When the man, impregnated to the very<lb/>
marrow with the practice of mendacity and the love of<lb/>
injustice, is raised to the Judicial Bench, an appropriate<lb/>
masquerade dress is put upon him, and the silly and deluded<lb/>
multitude behold in him justice personified.  Oftener<lb/>
has the Blachamore been rendered white by dipping,<lb/>
than the hireling advocate converted, by a seat on the Judicial<lb/>
Bench, into a lover of justice.  Every now and<lb/>
then in England, passes the following scene.  <add>Advocate or</add> Judge to witness.<lb/>
Do you believe in the existence of a God?  Witness<lb/>
to Judge – Yes – Judge, thereupon, to Advocate – Proceed with<lb/>
him, he is a good witness – Advocate or Judge to Witness –<lb/>
Do you believe in the existence of a God? – Witness – No:<lb/>
Judge – Out with him: his testimony is not receivable.<lb/>
Thus, then, if the Atheist will, to so indefensible a question,<lb/>
give a false answer, he is admitted:  but, if his regard<lb/>
for truth be such that he will not give a false answer,<lb/>
he is held out as an object of reproach, a man, <del>on</del> <add>to</add><lb/>
whose testimony no regard can safely be given, and, as<lb/>
such rejected.  But to the man of habitual mendacity,<lb/>
<del>the</del> <add>any such</add> man of conspicuously and painfully manifested mendacity,<lb/>
is an object of the deepest hatred and <del>revenge</del> <add>vengeance</add>;<lb/>
and, to gratify this malignant passion, he scruples not<lb/>
to make sacrifice of the injured party, whose misfortune<lb/>
it has been to have need of the testimony of this too veracious<lb/>
witness.</p>
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Untranscribed}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Ready_For_Review}}

Revision as of 03:47, 11 May 2022

Click Here To Edit

1823. Feby. 28.
Greece. J.B's Observations on particular Articles

But if there were a sort of man on whom a
note of eminent untrustworthiness should be put for
the instruction and guidance of a Jury, it should be the
hireling advocate. When the man, impregnated to the very
marrow with the practice of mendacity and the love of
injustice, is raised to the Judicial Bench, an appropriate
masquerade dress is put upon him, and the silly and deluded
multitude behold in him justice personified. Oftener
has the Blachamore been rendered white by dipping,
than the hireling advocate converted, by a seat on the Judicial
Bench, into a lover of justice. Every now and
then in England, passes the following scene. Advocate or Judge to witness.
Do you believe in the existence of a God? Witness
to Judge – Yes – Judge, thereupon, to Advocate – Proceed with
him, he is a good witness – Advocate or Judge to Witness –
Do you believe in the existence of a God? – Witness – No:
Judge – Out with him: his testimony is not receivable.
Thus, then, if the Atheist will, to so indefensible a question,
give a false answer, he is admitted: but, if his regard
for truth be such that he will not give a false answer,
he is held out as an object of reproach, a man, on to
whose testimony no regard can safely be given, and, as
such rejected. But to the man of habitual mendacity,
the any such man of conspicuously and painfully manifested mendacity,
is an object of the deepest hatred and revenge vengeance;
and, to gratify this malignant passion, he scruples not
to make sacrifice of the injured party, whose misfortune
it has been to have need of the testimony of this too veracious
witness.


Identifier: | JB/106/371/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 106.

Date_1

1823-02-28

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

106

Main Headings

constitutional code

Folio number

371

Info in main headings field

greece. jb's observations on particular articles

Image

001

Titles

Category

copy/fair copy sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

c13 / c6 / c2 / c4 / f45

Penner

john flowerdew colls

Watermarks

j whatman 1821

Marginals

Paper Producer

admiral pavel chichagov

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

1821

Notes public

ID Number

34959

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in