JB/078/172/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/078/172/001: Difference between revisions

BenthamBot (talk | contribs)
Auto upload
 
Ohsoldgirl (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 2: Line 2:
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->


''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
<head>1826 <sic>Aug.</sic> 25 or 18<lb/>Review of Humphreys</head> <!-- some in pencil --> <p>B <del>A</del> 1 <note>&sect; Agenda at <gap/><lb/.&sect; Desiderata <add>Corrigenda</add> from Humphreys</note><lb/>(7) (2) 1 <note>1. Formula<lb/>1 Lengthiness diminished<lb/>by resolution</note></p> <p>One little alternate there is, which in <sic>M<hi rend="superscript">r</hi></sic> <unclear>Buillard</unclear><lb/>view of the matter he says is <del>a simple</del> for as it goes on <gap/> is this</add><lb/>One little imperfection left is all <gap/>: lengthiness<lb/><del>compared <gap/></del> object of comparison <gap/> rest the existing<lb/>practice as it is &#x2014; but the practice as without detriment, how<lb/>on the contrary with considerable improvement it might: not to<lb/>speak of ordinary discourse is employed on ordinary occasion.<lb/>In ordinary discourse heights of <gap/> <gap/> might entail <gap/><lb/>injury to the reader be left to take its <gap/>, because with the<lb/>example of a slight <gap/> for additional attention, no term<lb/>no concurrence is any class can concern them at the<lb/>any body.  Not so in the discourse employed in legal indictments:<lb/>by no little addition to the length of a sentence<lb/>the misconception <add>may be produced</add> in the respect of it and from that misconception<lb/>loss is not in any other shape to the <gap/> of which there are<lb/> no bounds <add><gap/></add></p> 






<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Untranscribed}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{In_Progress}}

Revision as of 14:57, 18 May 2022

Click Here To Edit

1826 Aug. 25 or 18
Review of Humphreys

B A 1 § Agenda at <lb/.§ Desiderata Corrigenda from Humphreys
(7) (2) 1 1. Formula
1 Lengthiness diminished
by resolution

One little alternate there is, which in Mr Buillard
view of the matter he says is a simple for as it goes on is this</add>
One little imperfection left is all : lengthiness
compared object of comparison rest the existing
practice as it is — but the practice as without detriment, how
on the contrary with considerable improvement it might: not to
speak of ordinary discourse is employed on ordinary occasion.
In ordinary discourse heights of might entail
injury to the reader be left to take its , because with the
example of a slight for additional attention, no term
no concurrence is any class can concern them at the
any body. Not so in the discourse employed in legal indictments:
by no little addition to the length of a sentence
the misconception may be produced in the respect of it and from that misconception
loss is not in any other shape to the of which there are
no bounds




Identifier: | JB/078/172/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 78.

Date_1

1826-08-18

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

078

Main Headings

Review of Humphreys

Folio number

172

Info in main headings field

Review of Humphreys's Code

Image

001

Titles

Category

Text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

C7 / C2 / D1 / E1

Penner

Watermarks

J WHATMAN TURKEY MILL 1824

Marginals

Paper Producer

Jonathan Blenman

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

1824

Notes public

ID Number

25263

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in