★ Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.
Auto upload |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
<head>1826. Oct<hi rend="superscript">r</hi> 25.<lb/> | |||
Review of Humphreys.<lb/> | |||
Ch. Formula<lb/> | |||
1 All topics<lb/> | |||
i. <gap/>, Reasons<lb/> | |||
II. Topics, Reasons</head> | |||
<note>4<hi rend="superscript">*</hi><lb/> | |||
H. <del>should</del> in his samples<lb/> | |||
housed have made <gap/><lb/> | |||
references to the relative ma<gap/><lb/> | |||
in his Code.</note> | |||
<head>I. Same ideas, same words</head> | |||
<p>1. Result of comparison<lb/> | |||
of all three Draughts.<lb/> | |||
1. Rule. 1. <foreign>Eadem natura<lb/> | |||
eadem nomenclatura</foreign>,<lb/> | |||
violated.</p> | |||
<p>2.<lb/> | |||
Reasons for observance<lb/> | |||
1. For all repetitions, one<lb/> | |||
labour of attention<lb/> | |||
serves in all writers and<lb/> | |||
readers.<lb/> | |||
2. So, one reference.<lb/> | |||
3. Obviated the obscurity<lb/> | |||
and ambiguity<lb/> | |||
from difference of expression,<lb/> | |||
where <hi rend="underline">identity</hi><lb/> | |||
of import is intended;<lb/> | |||
<hi rend="underline">diversity</hi> being thus declared,<lb/> | |||
where diversity<lb/> | |||
is intended, no other<lb/> | |||
mode is there than this<lb/> | |||
for expressing it.</p> | |||
<p>3.<lb/> | |||
Of this, H. is not aware</p> | |||
<p>4.<lb/> | |||
Rule II. For giving instruction<lb/> | |||
relative to<lb/> | |||
the particulars of a<lb/> | |||
legal instrument, give<lb/> | |||
the <gap/> in general<lb/> | |||
terms to serve as <hi rend="underline">rules</hi>.<lb/> | |||
The examples suffice<lb/> | |||
not of themselves.</p> | |||
<p>5.<lb/> | |||
1. Only in so far as<lb/> | |||
the aptly frames to himself<lb/> | |||
the rule, will the<lb/> | |||
intended individual<lb/> | |||
copyist be able to conform<lb/> | |||
to it. Giving the<lb/> | |||
rule, the Legislator<lb/> | |||
saves all this labour<lb/> | |||
and the danger of aberration.</p> | |||
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{ | {{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{In_Progress}} | ||
1826. Octr 25.
Review of Humphreys.
Ch. Formula
1 All topics
i. , Reasons
II. Topics, Reasons
4*
H. should in his samples
housed have made
references to the relative ma
in his Code.
I. Same ideas, same words
1. Result of comparison
of all three Draughts.
1. Rule. 1. Eadem natura
eadem nomenclatura,
violated.
2.
Reasons for observance
1. For all repetitions, one
labour of attention
serves in all writers and
readers.
2. So, one reference.
3. Obviated the obscurity
and ambiguity
from difference of expression,
where identity
of import is intended;
diversity being thus declared,
where diversity
is intended, no other
mode is there than this
for expressing it.
3.
Of this, H. is not aware
4.
Rule II. For giving instruction
relative to
the particulars of a
legal instrument, give
the in general
terms to serve as rules.
The examples suffice
not of themselves.
5.
1. Only in so far as
the aptly frames to himself
the rule, will the
intended individual
copyist be able to conform
to it. Giving the
rule, the Legislator
saves all this labour
and the danger of aberration.
|
Identifier: | JB/078/009/002"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 78. |
|||
|---|---|---|---|
|
1826-10-25 |
1-6, 1-7, or 1, 2-6, or 7 - or 8, 9-10, or 11 - or 12 |
||
|
078 |
Review of Humphreys |
||
|
009 |
Review of Humphreys |
||
|
002 |
|||
|
Marginal summary sheet |
2 |
||
|
recto |
|||
|
J WHATMAN TURKEY MILL 1824 |
|||
|
Jonathan Blenman |
|||
|
1824 |
|||
|
25100 |
|||
