★ Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
<!-- Code last para --> | |||
<head>1824 Aug. 27<lb/> | |||
Constitutional Code</head> | |||
<note>Preface — <gap/><lb/> | |||
<unclear>Static functions</unclear></note> | |||
On no supposition | <p><unclear>Fondness</unclear> of pay and goodness of service go <gap/> together<lb/> | ||
can this distress be | So with for <gap/>. Vastness of pay and badness of service<lb/> | ||
open to a subject of just complaint | No individual can have any pretence for taking affront: <add>or</add> to ask <add><gap/></add> without exception<lb/> | ||
Whatever Be the mischief | not to any one in particular is the eye of suspicion directed. <add>Be the objector who he may,</add> Of the well groundedness<lb/> | ||
which a man is | of the suspicions is proof <del><gap/></del> <add>more</add> conclusive could not be desired than his <lb/><note>aversion to the precautions<lb/> | ||
from doing what it may | dictated by it.</note></p> | ||
if be the man <gap/> in question | |||
who he may, if he <gap/> is | <note>On no supposition<lb/> | ||
disposed to do it, the | can this <unclear>distress</unclear> be<lb/> | ||
check is necessary: if | open to <add>a subject of</add> just complaint<lb/> | ||
he is not disposed to | <del>Whatever</del> Be the mischief<lb/> | ||
do it, <gap/> the check | which a man is prevented<lb/> | ||
will not hurt him | from doing what it may<lb/> | ||
he will not feel it | <del>if</del> <add>be</add> the man <del><gap/></del> in question<lb/> | ||
p<gap/> it nor can | who he may, if he <del><gap/></del> <add>is</add><lb/> | ||
he: at <gap/> the very | disposed to do it, the<lb/> | ||
worst it can not be | check is necessary: if<lb/> | ||
worse than | he is not disposed to<lb/> | ||
But | do it, <del><gap/></del> the check<lb/> | ||
those in whom it is | will not hurt him<lb/> | ||
needful and those | he will not feel it<lb/> | ||
in whom it is needless | p<gap/> it nor can<lb/> | ||
who shall draw the | he: at <del><gap/></del> the very<lb/> | ||
line? | worst it can not be<lb/> | ||
worse than needless.<lb/> | |||
But between <del><gap/></del><lb/> | |||
those in whom it is<lb/> | |||
needful and those<lb/> | |||
in whom it is needless<lb/> | |||
who shall draw the<lb/> | |||
line?</note> | |||
<p>In this Code, one of the most striking features will<lb/> | |||
probably enough be, the strictness with which functionaries in<lb/> | |||
all <unclear>time</unclear> and grades, but more especially the highest, are in<lb/> | |||
here endeavoured to be held to their duty. It will be <sic>stiled</sic> unprecedented: <lb/> | |||
and the assertion conveyed <add>expressed</add> by this epithet, is unquestionably<lb/> | |||
true. <add>In</add> The term <del>will be <gap/></del> the reproach <add>assertion</add> of inaptitude,<lb/> | |||
will be understood to be conveyed: <add><gap/> to</add> this assertion no<lb/> | |||
such a<gap/> can <add>here</add> be given.</p> | |||
<p>It is unprecedented: why? Only because the fact<lb/> | |||
the Code having for its object <add>endeavour</add> the greatest good <add>happiness</add> of the greatest number<lb/> | |||
is unprecedented.</p> | |||
<p>What person willing of filling such offices will be <gap/><lb/> | |||
of being prevailed upon to accept them? <del><gap/></del><lb/> | |||
Altogether <unclear>natural</unclear> the question likewise. The answer is this<lb/> | |||
<gap/> person whatsoever: every person who is worthy; no person<lb/> | |||
who is not worthy: and to keep out those who are <del><gap/></del> <add>not</add> only<lb/> | |||
this is one main <add>use and</add> object in view in the establishment of them.</p> | |||
<p>A few <gap/> examples excepted, <add>the facility</add> of a Constitution<lb/> | |||
of which corruptic in the primum m<gap/> one main object<lb/> | |||
is that for <add>against the ad<gap/> of</add> those for whose use the constitution has been got up<lb/> | |||
<del>in degree of</del> in our shape or degree <del><gap/></del> relates inaptitude<lb/> | |||
<gap/> a bar.</p> | |||
<p>Be the r<gap/> what it may ever so large the existence of a <gap/><lb/> | |||
in the office proves the sufficiency of it, but be it ever so <gap/> that which is proposed<lb/> | |||
ever so <gap/> either insufficiency of it is not proved by the <gap/><lb/> | |||
<gap/> of their allotments of r<gap/> which are any<lb/> | |||
where in use, for many are the <gap/> in which offices<lb/> | |||
and those loaded with every <gap/> duty are excepted and <gap/><lb/> | |||
without un<gap/></p> | |||
<p>So again as the quality and <gap/> of attendance.</p> | |||
1824 Aug. 27
Constitutional Code
Preface —
Static functions
Fondness of pay and goodness of service go together
So with for . Vastness of pay and badness of service
No individual can have any pretence for taking affront: or to ask without exception
not to any one in particular is the eye of suspicion directed. Be the objector who he may, Of the well groundedness
of the suspicions is proof more conclusive could not be desired than his
aversion to the precautions
dictated by it.
On no supposition
can this distress be
open to a subject of just complaint
Whatever Be the mischief
which a man is prevented
from doing what it may
if be the man in question
who he may, if he is
disposed to do it, the
check is necessary: if
he is not disposed to
do it, the check
will not hurt him
he will not feel it
p it nor can
he: at the very
worst it can not be
worse than needless.
But between
those in whom it is
needful and those
in whom it is needless
who shall draw the
line?
In this Code, one of the most striking features will
probably enough be, the strictness with which functionaries in
all time and grades, but more especially the highest, are in
here endeavoured to be held to their duty. It will be stiled unprecedented:
and the assertion conveyed expressed by this epithet, is unquestionably
true. In The term will be the reproach assertion of inaptitude,
will be understood to be conveyed: to this assertion no
such a can here be given.
It is unprecedented: why? Only because the fact
the Code having for its object endeavour the greatest good happiness of the greatest number
is unprecedented.
What person willing of filling such offices will be
of being prevailed upon to accept them?
Altogether natural the question likewise. The answer is this
person whatsoever: every person who is worthy; no person
who is not worthy: and to keep out those who are not only
this is one main use and object in view in the establishment of them.
A few examples excepted, the facility of a Constitution
of which corruptic in the primum m one main object
is that for against the ad of those for whose use the constitution has been got up
in degree of in our shape or degree relates inaptitude
a bar.
Be the r what it may ever so large the existence of a
in the office proves the sufficiency of it, but be it ever so that which is proposed
ever so either insufficiency of it is not proved by the
of their allotments of r which are any
where in use, for many are the in which offices
and those loaded with every duty are excepted and
without un
So again as the quality and of attendance.
|
Identifier: | JB/042/049/002"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 42. |
|||
|---|---|---|---|
|
1824-06-11 |
not numbered |
||
|
042 |
constitutional code |
||
|
049 |
constitutional code |
||
|
002 |
|||
|
text sheet |
1 |
||
|
recto |
c1 / d45* |
||
|
jeremy bentham |
j whatman turkey mill 1824 |
||
|
admiral pavel chichagov |
|||
|
1824 |
|||
|
12972 |
|||
