JB/078/073/001: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 09:11, 3 June 2022

1826 Aug 24 or 18

Review of Humphrey's Code

§ Conclusion
Objections to H. obviated

§. Objections obviated

In vain would an objection say - is
and so forth

Objection non to
H. but what would
apply with greater
form to the established
function

The question is - first as to the degree: if
as with the present practice

2. as to the comparative facility if correct taken the
new plansystem and the present practice.

Identifier: \| JB/078/073/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 78.
Date_1	1826-08-18	Marginal Summary Numbering	Not numbered
Box	078	Main Headings	Review of Humphreys
Folio number	073	Info in main headings field	Review of Humphreys's Code
Image	001	Titles
Category	Text sheet	Number of Pages	1
Recto/Verso	recto	Page Numbering
Penner		Watermarks
Marginals	Jeremy Bentham	Paper Producer
Corrections		Paper Produced in Year
Notes public		ID Number	25164
Box Contents

@@ Line 2: / Line 2: @@
 <!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
-''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
+<p>1826 Aug 24 or 18</p>
+<head>Review of Humphrey's Code</head>
+<note>&sect; Conclusion<lb/>
+Objections to H. obviated</note><lb/>
+<p>&sect;. Objections obviated</p>
+<p>In vain would an objection say - <gap/> is <gap/> <gap/><lb/>
+and so forth</p>
+<note>Objection non to<lb/>
+H. but what would<lb/>
+apply with greater<lb/>
+form to the established<lb/>
+function</note><lb/>
+<p>The question is - first as to the <gap/> degree: if <gap/><lb/>
+as <gap/> with the <gap/> present practice</p>
+<p>2. as to the comparative facility if correct <gap/>taken the<lb/>
+new plan<add>system</add> and the present practice.</p>
 <!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
-{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Untranscribed}}
+{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{In_Progress}}