★ Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
<head>1827. May + + + 3<lb/> | |||
Constitutional Code.</head> | |||
<note>Ch. XII Judicatory collectively<lb/> | |||
§.1.</note> | |||
<p>3</p> | |||
<p>Cop<hi rend="superscript">d</hi>.</p> | |||
<note>8<lb/> | |||
<hi rend="underline">Judicatory</hi> vice <hi rend="underline">Court</hi><lb/> | |||
Reasons</note> | |||
<p>Ratiocinative<lb/> | |||
Art. 8. For the designation of a Judicatory<lb/> | |||
why employ this form to the exclusion of the word <del>Court<lb/> | |||
<gap/><gap/> <add><gap/><gap/></add></del> <add>more</add> commonly employed — the word <hi rend="underline">Court</hi>.</p> | |||
<note>1 Court ambiguous<lb/> | |||
Judicatory not<lb/> | |||
&<lb/> | |||
2 Court delusive</note> | |||
<p>Answer. Reason<lb/> | |||
1. The word <hi rend="underline">Judicatory</hi> is clear from all delusive<lb/> | |||
ambiguity: the word <hi rend="underline">Court</hi>, <del><gap/><gap/></del> <add>not.</add></p> | |||
<p>2. The word Court, besides <del>excluding clearness of <gap/></del> <add>ambiguity</add><lb/> | |||
is liable to produce mischievous error and delusion.</p> | |||
<note>10<lb/> | |||
3 Judicatory if ambiguous<lb/> | |||
its ambiguity slight<lb/> | |||
& innoxious</note> | |||
<p>3. Not <add>that</add> the word Judicatory is <del>it must be confessed is not</del><lb/> | |||
altogether free from ambiguity: but the ambiguity is of a sort<lb/> | |||
from which <del>no misconception <add>not <gap/></add></del> <add>not so much as misconception,</add> much less any evil effect in<lb/> | |||
practice can ensue. Originally it <del>seems to have</del> meant —<lb/> | |||
not a person or persons but a plan in which <del>the Judge of</del> <add>the person or persons act:</add><lb/> | |||
<del>any the Judge of more than one <gap/> which <gap/> <add>more commonly <gap/></add><lb/> | |||
in the exercise of their functions:</del> or in the case of the words<lb/> | |||
<hi rend="underline">Dormitory</hi>, <hi rend="underline">Laboratory</hi>, <hi rend="underline">Refectory</hi>: <add>— the usual place of residence of the functionary acting as such:</add> and, in conformity to<lb/> | |||
<del><gap/> In conformity to</del> a customary figure of speech <note>from the <hi rend="underline">original</hi> and <hi rend="underline">proper</hi> signification<lb/> | |||
comes the <hi rend="underline">improper</hi><lb/> | |||
<del>word</del> <add>— the</add> derivative</note><lb/> | |||
<del>from the signification a place in which a person or persons of a<lb/> | |||
certain <gap/> <gap/> it came to signify the person or<lb/> | |||
persons so sig<gap/>.</del></p> | |||
<note>11<lb/> | |||
4 Court not only has<lb/> | |||
this innoxious ambiguity<lb/> | |||
but another<lb/> | |||
noxious one</note> | |||
<p>4. Tainted <del>T T</del> <add>indeed <del><gap/></del> by</add> this same ambiguity is the import of the<lb/> | |||
word <hi rend="underline">Court</hi>: <del>tainted <add><gap/></add></del>. But besides this innoxious <unclear>fiction</unclear> of<lb/> | |||
<del><gap/> <del><gap/></del> it is <gap/></del> <add>imperfection, so is it</add> tainted by another, and that a<lb/> | |||
noxious one.</p> | |||
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{ | {{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{In_Progress}} | ||
1827. May + + + 3
Constitutional Code.
Ch. XII Judicatory collectively
§.1.
3
Copd.
8
Judicatory vice Court
Reasons
Ratiocinative
Art. 8. For the designation of a Judicatory
why employ this form to the exclusion of the word Court
more commonly employed — the word Court.
1 Court ambiguous
Judicatory not
&
2 Court delusive
Answer. Reason
1. The word Judicatory is clear from all delusive
ambiguity: the word Court, not.
2. The word Court, besides excluding clearness of ambiguity
is liable to produce mischievous error and delusion.
10
3 Judicatory if ambiguous
its ambiguity slight
& innoxious
3. Not that the word Judicatory is it must be confessed is not
altogether free from ambiguity: but the ambiguity is of a sort
from which no misconception not not so much as misconception, much less any evil effect in
practice can ensue. Originally it seems to have meant —
not a person or persons but a plan in which the Judge of the person or persons act:
any the Judge of more than one which more commonly
in the exercise of their functions: or in the case of the words
Dormitory, Laboratory, Refectory: — the usual place of residence of the functionary acting as such: and, in conformity to
In conformity to a customary figure of speech from the original and proper signification
comes the improper
word — the derivative
from the signification a place in which a person or persons of a
certain it came to signify the person or
persons so sig.
11
4 Court not only has
this innoxious ambiguity
but another
noxious one
4. Tainted T T indeed by this same ambiguity is the import of the
word Court: tainted . But besides this innoxious fiction of
it is imperfection, so is it tainted by another, and that a
noxious one.
|
Identifier: | JB/042/196/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 42. |
|||
|---|---|---|---|
|
1827-05 |
8-11 |
||
|
042 |
constitutional code |
||
|
196 |
constitutional code |
||
|
001 |
ratiocinative |
||
|
text sheet |
1 |
||
|
recto |
d3 / e3 |
||
|
jeremy bentham |
j whatman turkey mill 1826 |
||
|
admiral pavel chichagov |
|||
|
1826 |
|||
|
"copd" |
13119 |
||
