JB/002/216/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/002/216/001: Difference between revisions

Lea Stern (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Lea Stern (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 3: Line 3:
- -
- -


Even <del>the supposition that</del> <add>in the case of</add> the <del><gap/> <gap/></del> least<lb/> groups of now-expelled <add><del>in the case of</del></add> Note Holders <add>by</add> whom this<lb/> paper <del>was</del> <add>had been</add> held as a source of permanent income,<lb/> the supposition of their rejecting the paper <lb/>of the fresh specie <hi rend='underline'>altogether</hi>, appears scarcely tenable. <hi rend='superscript'>+</hi> <note><hi rend='superscript'>+</hi> They would still, to a certain degree, <del>become</del> be customers for Annuity Note paper, though with different views: <hi rend='underline'>before</hi> their expulsion, for the purpose of <hi rend='underline'>permanent</hi> income: <del>afterward</del> <hi rend='underline'>after</hi> that expulsion, for the purpose of <hi rend='underline'>temporary</hi> income, till a better income, <add>or better prospects</add> could be obtained from some other source.</note> <add><del>True it is, that of the</del> True is is, that by </add>proper <gap/> out of their hands they<lb/> made <!-- pound symbol -->2.7.<!-- maybe 9? -->6 a year: <add>which,</add> by the paper of the<lb/> fresh specie they, would make <del>hal</del> not half the<lb/> money <!-- pound symbol -->1.3.8-1/2 : But <del>half th</del> <!-- pound symbol --> 1.3.8-1/2,<lb/> which they <del>would</del> might begin making from the<lb/> very instant of their expulsion, would be <add><!-- added text -->pound symbol</add>1.3.8-1/2 better than<lb/> nothing; which is what <add>the interest of </add>a considerable part of<lb/> their 10 millions of capital would be reduced to, for<lb/> a <add>term</add> more or less considerable, <del>length of time</del> if it<lb/> rejected this <del><unclear>alternative</unclear></del> accommadation 
Even <del>the supposition that</del> <add>in the case of</add> the <del><gap/> <gap/></del> least<lb/> groups of now-expelled <add><del>in the case of</del></add> Note Holders <add>by</add> whom this<lb/> paper <del>was</del> <add>had been</add> held as a source of permanent income,<lb/> the supposition of their rejecting the paper <lb/>of the fresh specie <hi rend='underline'>altogether</hi>, appears scarcely tenable. <hi rend='superscript'>+</hi> <note><hi rend='superscript'>+</hi> They would still, to a certain degree, <del>become</del> be customers for Annuity Note paper, though with different views: <hi rend='underline'>before</hi> their expulsion, for the purpose of <hi rend='underline'>permanent</hi> income: <del>afterward</del> <hi rend='underline'>after</hi> that expulsion, for the purpose of <hi rend='underline'>temporary</hi> income, till a better income, <add>or better prospects</add> could be obtained from some other source.</note> <add><del>True it is, that of the</del> True is is, that by </add>proper <gap/> out of their hands they<lb/> made <!-- pound symbol -->2.7.<!-- maybe 9? -->6 a year: <add>which,</add> by the paper of the<lb/> fresh specie they, would make <del>hal</del> not half the<lb/> money <!-- pound symbol -->1.3.8-1/2 : But <del>half th</del> <!-- pound symbol --> 1.3.8-1/2,<lb/> which they <del>would</del> might begin making from the<lb/> very instant of their expulsion, would be <add><!-- added text -->pound symbol</add>1.3.8-1/2 better than<lb/> nothing; which is what <add>the interest of </add>a considerable part of<lb/> their 10 millions of capital would be reduced to, for<lb/> a <add>term</add> more or less considerable, <del>length of time</del> if it<lb/> rejected this <del><unclear>alternative</unclear></del> accommodation. <del>But of</del> <add>And, though in single<lb/> </add> more than a single <!-- pound symbol -->100 of the expelled<lb/>   





Revision as of 03:02, 25 October 2011

File:JB 002 216 001.jpg

- -

Even the supposition that in the case of the least
groups of now-expelled in the case of Note Holders by whom this
paper was had been held as a source of permanent income,
the supposition of their rejecting the paper
of the fresh specie altogether, appears scarcely tenable. + + They would still, to a certain degree, become be customers for Annuity Note paper, though with different views: before their expulsion, for the purpose of permanent income: afterward after that expulsion, for the purpose of temporary income, till a better income, or better prospects could be obtained from some other source. True it is, that of the True is is, that by proper out of their hands they
made 2.7.6 a year: which, by the paper of the
fresh specie they, would make hal not half the
money 1.3.8-1/2 : But half th 1.3.8-1/2,
which they would might begin making from the
very instant of their expulsion, would be pound symbol1.3.8-1/2 better than
nothing; which is what the interest of a considerable part of
their 10 millions of capital would be reduced to, for
a term more or less considerable, length of time if it
rejected this alternative accommodation. But of And, though in single
more than a single 100 of the expelled




















- -


Identifier: | JB/002/216/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 2.

Date_1

Marginal Summary Numbering

9

Box

002

Main Headings

Annuity Notes

Folio number

216

Info in main headings field

Image

001

Titles

Category

Text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

Recto"Recto" is not in the list (recto, verso) of allowed values for the "Rectoverso" property.

Page Numbering

F118

Penner

Jeremy Bentham

Watermarks

TW 1794

Marginals

Jeremy Bentham

Paper Producer

Francis Hall

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

1794

Notes public

ID Number

955

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in