JB/058/044/001

Click Here To Edit

16 May 1805
Evidence

What was is that mere case to be reconciled to? In a penal case
was the defendant to be reconciled to punishment? – the idea
was worthy of the execution of Don Carlos.† This however The
absurdity would have been too palpable: according to penal cases
accordingly it does not appear not even in idea to have ever been extended.
Will this be the case suppose a non-penal a non-penal one. The plaintiff,
suppose him in one of these offices, what was to be his fate? become of
him? Was he to have his right, or not to have it? If yes,
how was he to get it? and to that as to one if he got it, in
what respect was this office with a its hypocrite name different
from any Court of justice. If no, behold what comes are the blessed fruits of
reconciliation, and the sort of office that is to effect it.
Stripped of its hypocrite covering, a Reconciliation Office is a sort of an
office instituted set up to prevent a man's having his right, nor is nor this injury deemed sufficient, but means are to be employed
such as the manager may be pleased to employ, to force him
to shake hands with the oppressor, to force him to declare profess himself
reconciled to the injustice.

Identifier: | JB/058/044/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 58.
Date_1	1805-05-16	Marginal Summary Numbering
Box	058	Main Headings	evidence
Folio number	044	Info in main headings field	evidence
Image	001	Titles
Category	text sheet	Number of Pages	1
Recto/Verso	recto	Page Numbering	e2
Penner	jeremy bentham	Watermarks	1800
Marginals		Paper Producer
Corrections		Paper Produced in Year	1800
Notes public		ID Number	18713
Box Contents