JB/058/087/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/058/087/001: Difference between revisions

Kdownunder (talk | contribs)
m Protected "JB/058/087/001": ready for review ([Edit=Allow only administrators] (indefinite) [Move=Allow only administrators] (indefinite))
Kdownunder (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 2: Line 2:
'''[{{fullurl:JB/058/087/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
'''[{{fullurl:JB/058/087/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
 
<p><!-- pencil --><del>2 July 1804</del> 11 May 1805<lb/>
''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
<head>Procedure or Evidence</head></p>
 
<p><head><del>Ch.  Expence – viz: juridical expence.</del></head></p>
 
<p>Expence, it may <add>scarce hope</add> be said, is <add>in the case in question</add> but a branch of vexation:  or,<lb/>
 
if in this case the two objects are capable of being <add>in themselves</add> distinguished<lb/>
yet it is only in respect of he vexation issuing from it, that<lb/>
<del>expence</del> in the line of procedure as in any other, expence is<lb/>
inverted to a <add>any</add> place in the list of evils.  Then why make<lb/>
a separate article of <hi rend="underline">expence</hi>, and put the <add>putting the</add> species upon the same<lb/>
line on the logical scale with its <add>that</add> <hi rend="underline">genus</hi>?</p>
<p>I answer.<lb/>
The reason is – <add>For this reason –</add> comparing expence with vexation in<lb/>
other shapes it will be found that they have not in every instance <add>always</add><lb/>
or in the same degree, the same causes and <add>or</add> the same remedies.<lb/>
They will not therefore be in every instance combated on the same<lb/>
place, or by the same weapons.</p>
<p>1.  They have not the same causes.</p>
<p>Vexation in any other shape than expence is an <add>a sort of</add> evil which<lb/>
generally speaking no man except a party in the cause, <del>nor</del> in<lb/>
the instance of the adverse party, nor he always, has any natural<lb/>
interest in giving birth to <add>the production producing</add>.  Expence is an evil which<lb/>
but too many men <add>men in but too great numbers</add> and of  too great a variety of descriptions<lb/>
and those but too well able <add>enabled</add> to accomplish their purposes have<lb/>
an interest in producing on as many occasions <add>in producing, on as great a variety of occasions</add>, and in<lb/>
as great quantity on each occasion, as possible.</p>
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Untranscribed}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Ready_For_Review}}

Revision as of 03:08, 21 June 2022

Click Here To Edit

2 July 1804 11 May 1805
Procedure or Evidence

Ch. Expence – viz: juridical expence.

Expence, it may scarce hope be said, is in the case in question but a branch of vexation: or,
if in this case the two objects are capable of being in themselves distinguished
yet it is only in respect of he vexation issuing from it, that
expence in the line of procedure as in any other, expence is
inverted to a any place in the list of evils. Then why make
a separate article of expence, and put the putting the species upon the same
line on the logical scale with its that genus?

I answer.
The reason is – For this reason – comparing expence with vexation in
other shapes it will be found that they have not in every instance always
or in the same degree, the same causes and or the same remedies.
They will not therefore be in every instance combated on the same
place, or by the same weapons.

1. They have not the same causes.

Vexation in any other shape than expence is an a sort of evil which
generally speaking no man except a party in the cause, nor in
the instance of the adverse party, nor he always, has any natural
interest in giving birth to the production producing. Expence is an evil which
but too many men men in but too great numbers and of too great a variety of descriptions
and those but too well able enabled to accomplish their purposes have
an interest in producing on as many occasions in producing, on as great a variety of occasions, and in
as great quantity on each occasion, as possible.


Identifier: | JB/058/087/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 58.

Date_1

1805-05-11

Marginal Summary Numbering

8

Box

058

Main Headings

evidence

Folio number

087

Info in main headings field

evidence

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

e3

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

Marginals

jeremy bentham

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

18756

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in