★ Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
'''[{{fullurl:JB/058/115/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]''' | '''[{{fullurl:JB/058/115/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]''' | ||
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
<p><!-- pencil -->30 April 1805<lb/> | |||
<head>Evidence</head></p> | |||
<p><head>§. Subordinate ends – Compliance with arbitrary maxims<lb/> | |||
the propriety of which being imaginary <add>undemonstrable</add> is gratuitously assumed.</head></p> | |||
<p>As the legitimate end has its subordinate ends – as the<lb/> | |||
<add><gap/> general</add> propositions expressive <add>descriptive</add> of the general end, <del>have</del> include in their<lb/> | |||
embrace the particular propositions expressive of the several <add>correspondent</add> particular<lb/> | |||
ends – so <del>have</del> <add>has</add> the sinister general end <add>so is it with the sinister end</add>.</p> | |||
<p>The sinister end has for its immediate subordinates, the<lb/> | |||
several particular ends <add>objects</add> consisting in the observance of a countless<lb/> | |||
multitude of maxims, which after having been made by the hands<lb/> | |||
are the <add>so many</add> objects of the idolatry of the man of law.</p> | |||
<p><add>Of</add> Those maxims had they any real value, had they any<lb/> | |||
worth in them when weighed on the scale of utility, the value would<lb/> | |||
consist in this – <add>viz:</add> that the arrangements presented <add>recommended</add> by them were<lb/> | |||
in some assignable way or other, subservient to the ends of justice.<lb/> | |||
But when examined in that view, as such subserviency in<lb/> | |||
them can be found. What then is to be done? What is wanting<lb/> | |||
to them <add>in the way of support</add> in point of reason and utility must be made<lb/> | |||
up in prejudice. Accordingly their excellency is to be assumed:<lb/> | |||
and being assumed boldly is to be <add>proclaimed</add> trumpeted <unclear>clamorously</unclear> upon<lb/> | |||
all favourable occasions. All attempts – the very idea of<lb/> | |||
enquiring will then <gap/> <gap/> – of bringing them to the test<lb/> | |||
of reason and utility is <add>by every imaginable contrivance</add> to be discountenanced. They <del>are good</del> <add>are <unclear>current</unclear></add><lb/> | |||
exist: therefore they are good: they have <del>existed</del> <add>been carried</add> for <del>the long</del> a length of<lb/> | |||
time: therefore they are still better: <del>they</del> the age in which they began<lb/> | |||
to be current was in comparison of the present a dark and barbarous<lb/> | |||
age: – they are <add>be it so: they are but</add> so much the fitter for setting the law to present times.<lb/> | |||
By any standing <add>age</add>, <del><gap/></del> falshood <unclear>rejoins</unclear> if not into truth, into something<lb/> | |||
better: maxims <del><gap/></del> <unclear>rejoins</unclear>, if not into sense, into something more<lb/> | |||
useful and respectable.</p> | |||
<p>The science of ipse dixits.</p> | |||
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{ | {{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{In_Progress}} |
30 April 1805
Evidence
§. Subordinate ends – Compliance with arbitrary maxims
the propriety of which being imaginary undemonstrable is gratuitously assumed.
As the legitimate end has its subordinate ends – as the
general propositions expressive descriptive of the general end, have include in their
embrace the particular propositions expressive of the several correspondent particular
ends – so have has the sinister general end so is it with the sinister end.
The sinister end has for its immediate subordinates, the
several particular ends objects consisting in the observance of a countless
multitude of maxims, which after having been made by the hands
are the so many objects of the idolatry of the man of law.
Of Those maxims had they any real value, had they any
worth in them when weighed on the scale of utility, the value would
consist in this – viz: that the arrangements presented recommended by them were
in some assignable way or other, subservient to the ends of justice.
But when examined in that view, as such subserviency in
them can be found. What then is to be done? What is wanting
to them in the way of support in point of reason and utility must be made
up in prejudice. Accordingly their excellency is to be assumed:
and being assumed boldly is to be proclaimed trumpeted clamorously upon
all favourable occasions. All attempts – the very idea of
enquiring will then – of bringing them to the test
of reason and utility is by every imaginable contrivance to be discountenanced. They are good are current
exist: therefore they are good: they have existed been carried for the long a length of
time: therefore they are still better: they the age in which they began
to be current was in comparison of the present a dark and barbarous
age: – they are be it so: they are but so much the fitter for setting the law to present times.
By any standing age, falshood rejoins if not into truth, into something
better: maxims rejoins, if not into sense, into something more
useful and respectable.
The science of ipse dixits.
Identifier: | JB/058/115/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 58. |
|||
---|---|---|---|
1805-04-30 |
|||
058 |
evidence |
||
115 |
evidence |
||
001 |
|||
text sheet |
1 |
||
recto |
d1 |
||
jeremy bentham |
|||
18784 |
|||