JB/058/170/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/058/170/001: Difference between revisions

Kdownunder (talk | contribs)
m Protected "JB/058/170/001": ready for review ([Edit=Allow only administrators] (indefinite) [Move=Allow only administrators] (indefinite))
Kdownunder (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 2: Line 2:
'''[{{fullurl:JB/058/170/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
'''[{{fullurl:JB/058/170/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
 
<p><!-- pencil -->29 May 1803<lb/>
''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
<head>Evidence Introd.</head></p>
 
<p>Among those three contending principles, the principle of utility<lb/>
 
was pointed out as that <add>the one and the only one</add> to which, by a man sitting down<lb/>
 
to the subject with the full command of his reason, unclouded by<lb/>
prejudice, undisturbed by fallacious hopes or fears, the appellation<lb/>
of <hi rend="underline">legitimate</hi> <add>in the character of a standard of propriety</add>, could scarcely be refused:  of which choice<lb/>
the rejection of the two other <add>both the</add> principles in the like character<lb/>
was at the same time stated as a necessary consequence:  both <add>they being each<lb/>
those spurious or false principles being both</add> of them being altogether repugnant to that true and legitimate<lb/>
principle:  and the appeal to either of them <add>those false principles</add> in the character of<lb/>
a <add>standard</add> standard altogether incompatible with an appeal to the<lb/>
only true one.</p>
<p><del>That</del> With very little transition, correspondent to the particular<lb/>
nature of the subject, the same arrangement may be <add>will be</add><lb/>
applied <add>found applicable</add> to the present purpose.  In the three primary groupes<lb/>
or classes of the ends of justice, we have <add>may be seen</add> so many immediate<lb/>
branches of the principle of utility, as applied to the subject<lb/>
in question – the form <add>proper</add> to be given by the legislator to the system<lb/>
of adjective law i.e. to the system of procedure.  <add>To the principle of asceticism</add> In <add>To</add> any<lb/>
<add>other</add> distinct end <del>which</del> to the accomplishment of which the endeavours<lb/>
of any person or set of persons employed in the planning<lb/>
or execution of the system of procedure or any part of<lb/>
it may come to be directed <add><del>in turn the counterpart</del></add> corresponds the principle of<lb/>
asceticism, it being understood <del>and experienced</del> (for the purpose<lb/>
of the argument at least, and untill <del>time and occasion can</del><lb/>
the <del>plan</del> <add>course</add> of the enquiry brings on the proof,) that <del><gap/></del> if all<lb/>
measures directed to the accomplishment of any such by- end<lb/>
the necessary consequence will be a <add>the</add> proportionable contravention<lb/>
of the legitimate end.</p>
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Untranscribed}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Ready_For_Review}}

Revision as of 03:20, 29 June 2022

Click Here To Edit

29 May 1803
Evidence Introd.

Among those three contending principles, the principle of utility
was pointed out as that the one and the only one to which, by a man sitting down
to the subject with the full command of his reason, unclouded by
prejudice, undisturbed by fallacious hopes or fears, the appellation
of legitimate in the character of a standard of propriety, could scarcely be refused: of which choice
the rejection of the two other both the principles in the like character
was at the same time stated as a necessary consequence: both they being each
those spurious or false principles being both
of them being altogether repugnant to that true and legitimate
principle: and the appeal to either of them those false principles in the character of
a standard standard altogether incompatible with an appeal to the
only true one.

That With very little transition, correspondent to the particular
nature of the subject, the same arrangement may be will be
applied found applicable to the present purpose. In the three primary groupes
or classes of the ends of justice, we have may be seen so many immediate
branches of the principle of utility, as applied to the subject
in question – the form proper to be given by the legislator to the system
of adjective law i.e. to the system of procedure. To the principle of asceticism In To any
other distinct end which to the accomplishment of which the endeavours
of any person or set of persons employed in the planning
or execution of the system of procedure or any part of
it may come to be directed in turn the counterpart corresponds the principle of
asceticism, it being understood and experienced (for the purpose
of the argument at least, and untill time and occasion can
the plan course of the enquiry brings on the proof,) that if all
measures directed to the accomplishment of any such by- end
the necessary consequence will be a the proportionable contravention
of the legitimate end.


Identifier: | JB/058/170/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 58.

Date_1

1805-05-25

Marginal Summary Numbering

2-4

Box

058

Main Headings

evidence

Folio number

170

Info in main headings field

evidence introd

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

d2 / e2

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

Marginals

jeremy bentham

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

18839

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in