JB/058/439/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/058/439/001: Difference between revisions

Kdownunder (talk | contribs)
m Protected "JB/058/439/001": ready for review ([Edit=Allow only administrators] (indefinite) [Move=Allow only administrators] (indefinite))
Kdownunder (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 2: Line 2:
'''[{{fullurl:JB/058/439/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
'''[{{fullurl:JB/058/439/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
 
<p><!-- pencil -->2 July 1805<lb/>
''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
<head>Evidence</head></p>
 
<p>Contrary to law, to existing law, to the law given out by<lb/>
 
men of law <add>in the form of jurisprudential law</add> under the influence of the technical system?  contrary to<lb/>
 
law in this sense, and <add>is it from thence that it is the inference is to be deduced of its being to be inferred to be</add> thence contrary to the interests of mankind?<lb/>
the opposite inference <add>presumption</add> would of the two be much the more reasonable.<lb/>
Contrary to statute law: yes: but it <del>was</del> <add>has</add> not <del>under</del> been <del>under the<lb/>
<gap/></del> <add>in the way</add> of statute law <add>it has</add> that the technical system of procedure has<lb/>
been formed. <del>by the</del></p>
<p>Contrary to law? as if it was in the nature of the case<lb/>
that any exercise of judicial power, carried on for ages under the<lb/>
eye and without the concern of the legislative meaning have by legislature<lb/>
the supreme power <add>in the State</add>, that any practice <add>howsoever mischievous</add>, carried on by such<lb/>
hands and under such eyes, could be otherwise than according<lb/>
to law.  Contrary to law this abuse?  Oh <add>Not <del><gap/></del></add> as <add>it</add> noticed:  it is<lb/>
all of it according <del><gap/></del> to law:  indisputably <add>indubitably</add> according to law:  and<lb/>
in that conformity consists the <gap/> <add>magnitude <gap/> oppressiveness</add> of the grievance.</p>
<p>According to law and as such will ever be unresistingly<lb/>
howsoever reluctantly submitted to, by every good subject, by every<lb/>
enlightened lover of mankind, so long as it continues, for were<lb/>
it ever so much more burthensome the mischief of submission,<lb/>
the known and definite mischief of submission would never <del>be</del><lb/>
approach to an equality with the mischief the indefinite infinite<lb/>
<add>fathomless</add> mischief of resistance.</p>
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Untranscribed}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Ready_For_Review}}

Revision as of 03:44, 6 July 2022

Click Here To Edit

2 July 1805
Evidence

Contrary to law, to existing law, to the law given out by
men of law in the form of jurisprudential law under the influence of the technical system? contrary to
law in this sense, and is it from thence that it is the inference is to be deduced of its being to be inferred to be thence contrary to the interests of mankind?
the opposite inference presumption would of the two be much the more reasonable.
Contrary to statute law: yes: but it was has not under been under the
in the way of statute law it has that the technical system of procedure has
been formed. by the

Contrary to law? as if it was in the nature of the case
that any exercise of judicial power, carried on for ages under the
eye and without the concern of the legislative meaning have by legislature
the supreme power in the State, that any practice howsoever mischievous, carried on by such
hands and under such eyes, could be otherwise than according
to law. Contrary to law this abuse? Oh Not as it noticed: it is
all of it according to law: indisputably indubitably according to law: and
in that conformity consists the magnitude oppressiveness of the grievance.

According to law and as such will ever be unresistingly
howsoever reluctantly submitted to, by every good subject, by every
enlightened lover of mankind, so long as it continues, for were
it ever so much more burthensome the mischief of submission,
the known and definite mischief of submission would never be
approach to an equality with the mischief the indefinite infinite
fathomless mischief of resistance.


Identifier: | JB/058/439/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 58.

Date_1

1805-07-02

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

058

Main Headings

evidence

Folio number

439

Info in main headings field

evidence

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

c2

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

1800

Marginals

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

1800

Notes public

ID Number

19108

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in