JB/058/344/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/058/344/001: Difference between revisions

Kdownunder (talk | contribs)
m Protected "JB/058/344/001": ready for review ([Edit=Allow only administrators] (indefinite) [Move=Allow only administrators] (indefinite))
Kdownunder (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 2: Line 2:
'''[{{fullurl:JB/058/344/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
'''[{{fullurl:JB/058/344/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
 
<p><!-- pencil -->19 April 1805<lb/>
''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
<head>Evidence</head></p>
 
<p>Thus then stands the matter with regard to the rule<lb/>
 
<hi rend="underline"><foreign>Andi alteram partem</foreign></hi>. 
 
</p><add>On certain occasions</add> To a certain <add>purposes</add> degree <add>In certain respects</add>, it is the interest<lb/>
of the man of law, that it be observed:  and to <add>in</add> those it has accordingly been observed accordingly/  To <add>In</add> others it is the interest<lb/>
of the man of law that it should not be observed:  and in this<lb/>
it has been violated <add>is violated</add> <del>constantly violated <add>and</add> without remorse</del><lb/>
<add>compleatly abrogated</add>.  <del>To</del> So far as it is his interest that it be observed, it is so on<lb/>
a double account:  were it <add>not observed</add> violated <add>to all purposes</add>, the people might not <add>be<lb/>
dissatisfied</add> be quite to blind to the defects <add>abuses</add> of the system as they are.  The<lb/>
people might be <add>more of less</add> dissatisfied:  and what is a great deal <add>moreover what would be a much comes <gap/> have</add> worse<lb/>
more serious mischief.<lb/>
<del>Suits would be ended almost as soon as begun, or rather there were</del><lb/>
<add>more than</add> one half of the profit of <add>extractible from</add> every suit would be lost.</p>
<p>Observed? did I say? – But in what sense is it ever <add>that it is</add> observed<lb/>
not <add>never</add> in a true sense, only <add>never but</add> in a fictitious one.  Under the name<lb/>
of party who is it that is heard?  <del>Not h</del> Not the party himself<lb/>
on either side:  not the party himself, but his deputy, or<lb/>
rather his deputy's deputy:  not the party himself, but a deputy,<lb/>
deputy whom he is, forced <add>compelled</add> to employ, on pain of not being<lb/>
<hi rend="underline">heard</hi> in any sense.  And for whose sake then is he heard<lb/>
<add>ever –</add> in this fictitious sense? for the sake of the deputy and the deputy's<lb/>
deputy and their connections <add>confederates, and not his: <del><gap/> <unclear>captives</unclear></del></add>:  for if it were for his own sake,<lb/>
i would be in his own <hi rend="underline">person</hi>, that he would be heard.</p>
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Untranscribed}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Ready_For_Review}}

Revision as of 05:13, 11 July 2022

Click Here To Edit

19 April 1805
Evidence

Thus then stands the matter with regard to the rule
Andi alteram partem.

On certain occasions To a certain purposes degree In certain respects, it is the interest

of the man of law, that it be observed: and to in those it has accordingly been observed accordingly/ To In others it is the interest
of the man of law that it should not be observed: and in this
it has been violated is violated constantly violated and without remorse
compleatly abrogated. To So far as it is his interest that it be observed, it is so on
a double account: were it not observed violated to all purposes, the people might not be
dissatisfied
be quite to blind to the defects abuses of the system as they are. The
people might be more of less dissatisfied: and what is a great deal moreover what would be a much comes have worse
more serious mischief.
Suits would be ended almost as soon as begun, or rather there were

more than one half of the profit of extractible from every suit would be lost.

Observed? did I say? – But in what sense is it ever that it is observed
not never in a true sense, only never but in a fictitious one. Under the name
of party who is it that is heard? Not h Not the party himself
on either side: not the party himself, but his deputy, or
rather his deputy's deputy: not the party himself, but a deputy,
deputy whom he is, forced compelled to employ, on pain of not being
heard in any sense. And for whose sake then is he heard
ever – in this fictitious sense? for the sake of the deputy and the deputy's
deputy and their connections confederates, and not his: captives: for if it were for his own sake,
i would be in his own person, that he would be heard.


Identifier: | JB/058/344/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 58.

Date_1

1805-04-19

Marginal Summary Numbering

11-12

Box

058

Main Headings

evidence

Folio number

344

Info in main headings field

evidence

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

c7 / c3

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

Marginals

jeremy bentham

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

19013

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in