★ Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
<head>5<lb/> | |||
1826. <del>May</del> June 14.<lb/> | |||
Penal Code<lb/> | |||
Ch. Remedies<lb/> | |||
§. 1.</head> | |||
<note>5<lb/> | |||
Objection 2 Exasperation<lb/> | |||
produced<lb/> | |||
instead of Reconciliation<lb/> | |||
by revival of animosities<lb/> | |||
Answers Reconciliation<lb/> | |||
more probable<lb/> | |||
than exasperation</note> | |||
<p>Objection 2. By reviving distinct animosities,<lb/> | |||
exasperation is more probable than reconciliation.<lb/> | |||
answer. This bad effect is not altogether<lb/> | |||
improbable, but the opposite good effect presents itself,<lb/> | |||
as being in a preponderant degree probable. <hi rend="superscript"><gap/></hi></p> | |||
<p>Suppose every suit brought singly without admittance<lb/> | |||
of accumulation, still less of reciprocation,<lb/> | |||
have among wrongs on the part say of the pursuer<lb/> | |||
— among wrongs in any number <one alone experiences<lb/> | |||
redress. Here then make their way out of the<lb/> | |||
judicatory two parties, both of them in the state<lb/> | |||
of inadequate exasperation: the pursuer because<lb/> | |||
for ways in any number has great <gap/>, he<lb/> | |||
has obtained redress no more than one; the<lb/> | |||
defendant because of wrongs in any number,<lb/> | |||
he has not obtained redress for so much as one:<lb/> | |||
but on the contrary has been <gap/> as well as<lb/> | |||
victim to the triumph of his injurious and oppressive<lb/> | |||
adversary.</p> | |||
<note>☞<lb/> | |||
note the use of 'all this'<lb/> | |||
against <hi rend="underline">duels</hi></note> | |||
<p>No judge in this case to present to the view<lb/> | |||
and feelings of each party litigant the weakness of human<lb/> | |||
nature as exemplified in his person and conduct: no<lb/> | |||
judge to explain to each of the litigants the intimacy<lb/> | |||
of the connexion between effective benevolence of<lb/> | |||
each individuals self regarding interest: no judge to present to the view of<lb/> | |||
each the saving in respect of delay, vexation and expense that will be produced<lb/> | |||
by reciprocal voluntary set offs, instead of waiting for the compulsory<lb/> | |||
set offs, which after an indefinitely <unclear>heavy mass</unclear> of delay, vexation & expense will not fail if demanded<lb/> | |||
to be made by <unclear>authority</unclear> of the judge.</p> | |||
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | <!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE --> | ||
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{ | {{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{In_Progress}} |
5
1826. May June 14.
Penal Code
Ch. Remedies
§. 1.
5
Objection 2 Exasperation
produced
instead of Reconciliation
by revival of animosities
Answers Reconciliation
more probable
than exasperation
Objection 2. By reviving distinct animosities,
exasperation is more probable than reconciliation.
answer. This bad effect is not altogether
improbable, but the opposite good effect presents itself,
as being in a preponderant degree probable.
Suppose every suit brought singly without admittance
of accumulation, still less of reciprocation,
have among wrongs on the part say of the pursuer
— among wrongs in any number <one alone experiences
redress. Here then make their way out of the
judicatory two parties, both of them in the state
of inadequate exasperation: the pursuer because
for ways in any number has great , he
has obtained redress no more than one; the
defendant because of wrongs in any number,
he has not obtained redress for so much as one:
but on the contrary has been as well as
victim to the triumph of his injurious and oppressive
adversary.
☞
note the use of 'all this'
against duels
No judge in this case to present to the view
and feelings of each party litigant the weakness of human
nature as exemplified in his person and conduct: no
judge to explain to each of the litigants the intimacy
of the connexion between effective benevolence of
each individuals self regarding interest: no judge to present to the view of
each the saving in respect of delay, vexation and expense that will be produced
by reciprocal voluntary set offs, instead of waiting for the compulsory
set offs, which after an indefinitely heavy mass of delay, vexation & expense will not fail if demanded
to be made by authority of the judge.
Identifier: | JB/068/364/002"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 68. |
|||
---|---|---|---|
1826-06-14 |
5 |
||
068 |
penal code |
||
364 |
penal code |
||
002 |
|||
copy/fair copy sheet |
1 |
||
recto |
b5 |
||
john neal |
|||
22559 |
|||