JB/058/355/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/058/355/001: Difference between revisions

Kdownunder (talk | contribs)
m Protected "JB/058/355/001": ready for review ([Edit=Allow only administrators] (indefinite) [Move=Allow only administrators] (indefinite))
Kdownunder (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 2: Line 2:
'''[{{fullurl:JB/058/355/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
'''[{{fullurl:JB/058/355/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
 
<p><!-- pencil -->30 Jan<hi rend="superscript">y</hi> 1805<lb/>
''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
<head>Evidence</head></p>
 
<p><head>Ch.  English Law.  Introductory Observations</head></p>
 
<p>In the Roman System <add>mode</add> of <add>regular</add> procedure in relation to the<lb/>
 
extraction and receipt of testimony, we have seen <add>seeing</add> a uniform<lb/>
system of incongruity and imperfectionL  a system <del><gap/></del> <add>deplorably</add><lb/>
<del>bad in itself, but so far good, inasmuch as it uniformly pursued</del><lb/>
not good for any case, <add>with inconsiderable exceptions, and those in themselves beneficial ones</add> but uniformly applied to all<lb/>
cases.  <add>We have seen</add> It is radically and totally unfit for its purpose, unconducive<lb/>
to its professed objects <add>ends</add>: but to that general nastiness <add>imperfection mischief</add><lb/>
it has not added <add>does not add</add> the <del>mis</del> particular mischiefs of complication<lb/>
on the part of the system, nor the reproach of inconsistenc<lb/>
on the part of <add>the men in power</add> those who act upon it.</p>
<p>The reader will <unclear>here</unclear> have before him a system which<lb/>
in respect of its leading features <add>fundamental points</add> may be seen to stand at<lb/>
the pinnacle of perfection:  a system the excellence of which<lb/>
if <del><gap/></del> not very clearly <add>distinctly</add> understood is at least universally<lb/>
felt and recognized:  recognized, and proclaimed with<lb/>
general <add>universal</add> principle and exultation:  boasted of, and by the<lb/>
very same whose persuasion <add>conviction</add> of the exclusive excellence of it<lb/>
is most <add>frequently declared</add> decidedly and acted upon in practice, <add>on particular occasions habitually</add> departed <add>discarded</add> from<lb/>
with the most unfeeling and <unclear>passive</unclear> indifference;  <add>habitually</add> discarded,<lb/>
and exchanged for a system <add>mode</add> which if <add>wherever it is</add> not exactly the same<lb/>
as the Roman mode above delineated is still worse.</p>
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Untranscribed}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Ready_For_Review}}

Revision as of 04:23, 12 July 2022

Click Here To Edit

30 Jany 1805
Evidence

Ch. English Law. Introductory Observations

In the Roman System mode of regular procedure in relation to the
extraction and receipt of testimony, we have seen seeing a uniform
system of incongruity and imperfectionL a system deplorably
bad in itself, but so far good, inasmuch as it uniformly pursued
not good for any case, with inconsiderable exceptions, and those in themselves beneficial ones but uniformly applied to all
cases. We have seen It is radically and totally unfit for its purpose, unconducive
to its professed objects ends: but to that general nastiness imperfection mischief
it has not added does not add the mis particular mischiefs of complication
on the part of the system, nor the reproach of inconsistenc
on the part of the men in power those who act upon it.

The reader will here have before him a system which
in respect of its leading features fundamental points may be seen to stand at
the pinnacle of perfection: a system the excellence of which
if not very clearly distinctly understood is at least universally
felt and recognized: recognized, and proclaimed with
general universal principle and exultation: boasted of, and by the
very same whose persuasion conviction of the exclusive excellence of it
is most frequently declared decidedly and acted upon in practice, on particular occasions habitually departed discarded from
with the most unfeeling and passive indifference; habitually discarded,
and exchanged for a system mode which if wherever it is not exactly the same
as the Roman mode above delineated is still worse.


Identifier: | JB/058/355/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 58.

Date_1

1805-01-30

Marginal Summary Numbering

1-2

Box

058

Main Headings

evidence

Folio number

355

Info in main headings field

evidence

Image

001

Titles

english law / introductory observations

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

d1 / e1

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

1800

Marginals

jeremy bentham

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

1800

Notes public

"superseded?"

ID Number

19024

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in