JB/058/356/001

Click Here To Edit

30 Jany 1805
Evidence

The rules by in which the ne plus ultrà of perfection in
this time stands expressed, have above been brought to view,
the rules prescribing claiming the preference in favour of vivâ voce examination, and expressive of the plan to be observed in the occasion
relation to it.( ) ( ) viz: Rules 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 15, 16, 17. Those rules, in so far as as to concern the fundamental
points of the plan as to every thing but a few here and
there incidental points of imperfection easily corrected, are constitute the exact are no more than a
correct copy delineation picture of that which for shortness may be termed the
English System.

If custom Custom produced and supported by a mixture
of professional interest and party prejudice, would find an
equally short and more particular mode of expressing the
characteristic features of this system by looking for seeking a
denomination for it in the Trial by Jury, and regarding considering
it as an inseparable accompaniment of that mode of
judicature. But the plain truth of the case is, (examples in
abundance will manifest it so to be) is that its connection
with that the species of mixt tribunal so composed is purely accidental,
and that a much more advantageous perfect system specimen
of it may be seen in those affectedly despised but most useful of al non-penal tribunals, the stated Courts of Requests
but more commonly Courts of Conscience.

Identifier: | JB/058/356/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 58.
Date_1	1805-01-30	Marginal Summary Numbering	3-4
Box	058	Main Headings	evidence
Folio number	356	Info in main headings field	evidence
Image	001	Titles
Category	text sheet	Number of Pages	1
Recto/Verso	recto	Page Numbering	d2 / e2
Penner	jeremy bentham	Watermarks
Marginals	jeremy bentham	Paper Producer
Corrections		Paper Produced in Year
Notes public		ID Number	19025
Box Contents