JB/058/409/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/058/409/001: Difference between revisions

Kdownunder (talk | contribs)
m Protected "JB/058/409/001": ready for review ([Edit=Allow only administrators] (indefinite) [Move=Allow only administrators] (indefinite))
Kdownunder (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 2: Line 2:
'''[{{fullurl:JB/058/409/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
'''[{{fullurl:JB/058/409/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
 
<p><!-- pencil -->31 Jan<hi rend="superscript">y</hi> 1805<lb/>
''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
<head>Evidence</head></p>
 
<p>as well as law, all of a sudden he found himself<lb/>
 
prosecuted, and in due time punished.  Punished? – and<lb/>
 
for what?  for having broken this is that <del>rule</del> jurisprudential<lb/>
rule of procedure this or that one of the number<lb/>
of that inexhaustible stock of laws that never had been<lb/>
made.  What was to be done?  Prudence put an<lb/>
absolute veto upon the attempt to serve the public <add>in such terms:</add> under the<lb/>
yoke of a tyranny, which from <add>by</add> being <add>itself</add> exempt not only<lb/>
from punishment but from reproach <add>of every kind</add> was but so much<lb/>
the more intolerable.  What was to be done?  <add>Either</add> since security<lb/>
was to be given against misdecision of this kind, or every<lb/>
man who was not competent to this <add>necessary</add> branch of public service<lb/>
would shrink from it, and thus society would fall to pieces.<lb/>
The true remedy it is but repetition to say would have<lb/>
been to draw up a system of <add>summary</add> procedure, and that a rational<lb/>
one which is as much as to say such would have <del>been</del><lb/>
run counter in <add>throughout in opposition to</add> every point, and cast shame upon the<lb/>
regular <add>technical</add> mode.  For this as for all other tasks, a union<lb/>
of ability and willingness would have been necessary.  Of<lb/>
willingness howsoever it might have been in respect of ability,<lb/>
not a particle was to be found any where among men of law<lb/>
of ability, not to speak of willingness adequate to such a labour <add>including <hi rend="superscript">⊞</hi> <note>for this is among the cases in which adequate ability can scarce exist without willingness</note><lb/>
that of combating the inevitable opposition of men of law</add> no sufficient stock was to be found elsewhere.  On this occasion<lb/>
as on so many others, the resource was – to cut<lb/>
the knot instead of untying it.  A blank form of conviction<lb/>
was <add>to be</add> drawn up <del>such came to be the custom on</del> for the use of<lb/>
the non-professional Judge, and that form <del>they</del> filled up<lb/>
and signed, the judgment, unless in case of corruption or other criminal<lb/>
misconduct, was to be unassailable.</p>
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Untranscribed}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Ready_For_Review}}

Revision as of 05:06, 16 July 2022

Click Here To Edit

31 Jany 1805
Evidence

as well as law, all of a sudden he found himself
prosecuted, and in due time punished. Punished? – and
for what? for having broken this is that rule jurisprudential
rule of procedure this or that one of the number
of that inexhaustible stock of laws that never had been
made. What was to be done? Prudence put an
absolute veto upon the attempt to serve the public in such terms: under the
yoke of a tyranny, which from by being itself exempt not only
from punishment but from reproach of every kind was but so much
the more intolerable. What was to be done? Either since security
was to be given against misdecision of this kind, or every
man who was not competent to this necessary branch of public service
would shrink from it, and thus society would fall to pieces.
The true remedy it is but repetition to say would have
been to draw up a system of summary procedure, and that a rational
one which is as much as to say such would have been
run counter in throughout in opposition to every point, and cast shame upon the
regular technical mode. For this as for all other tasks, a union
of ability and willingness would have been necessary. Of
willingness howsoever it might have been in respect of ability,
not a particle was to be found any where among men of law
of ability, not to speak of willingness adequate to such a labour including for this is among the cases in which adequate ability can scarce exist without willingness
that of combating the inevitable opposition of men of law
no sufficient stock was to be found elsewhere. On this occasion
as on so many others, the resource was – to cut
the knot instead of untying it. A blank form of conviction
was to be drawn up such came to be the custom on for the use of
the non-professional Judge, and that form they filled up
and signed, the judgment, unless in case of corruption or other criminal
misconduct, was to be unassailable.


Identifier: | JB/058/409/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 58.

Date_1

1805-01-31

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

058

Main Headings

evidence

Folio number

409

Info in main headings field

evidence

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

d6 / e3

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

cw 1799

Marginals

Paper Producer

c. abbit lees

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

1799

Notes public

ID Number

19078

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in