JB/003/080/002: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page on our Untranscribed Manuscripts list.

JB/003/080/002: Difference between revisions

No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 8: Line 8:


7. The War represented as by so much more <hi rend="underline">expensive</hi> that it <hi rend="underline">is</hi> :-
7. The War represented as by so much more <hi rend="underline">expensive</hi> that it <hi rend="underline">is</hi> :-
administration, the <hi rend="underline">less</hi> popular: <hi rend="underline">people</hi>, the <unclear>les</unclear> contented. What if the <hi rend="underline">New</hi> drinking Fund had been fed in the same way? the <hi rend="underline">apparent</hi> load would have been <hi rend="underline">apparently</hi> intolerable. (<hi rend="underline">Per Contra</hi><foreign></foreign> the apparent amplitude of the Old Sinking-Fund would be so much the <hi rend="underline">les</hi> upon the proposed plan :- <hi rend="underline">unles</hi> explained; for which a line or two in a preamble would suffice.
administration, the less popular: <hi rend="underline">people</hi>, the <unclear>les</unclear> contented. What if the <hi rend="underline">New</hi> Sinking Fund had been fed in the same way? the <hi rend="underline">apparent</hi> load would have been <hi rend="underline">apparently</hi> intolerable. (<hi rend="underline">Per Contra</hi><foreign></foreign> the apparent amplitude of the Old Sinking-Fund would be so much the <hi rend="underline">les</hi> upon the proposed plan :- <hi rend="underline">unles</hi> explained; for which a line or two in a preamble would suffice.


8. <hi rend="underline">Inconsistency</hi>, as compared with the <hi rend="underline">New</hi> Sinking Fund :- <hi rend="underline">Fiction</hi> <hi rend="underline">complication</hi> and <hi rend="underline">obscurity</hi>. N.B. Nothing can be more simple than the calculation requisite for the proposed substitution :- <hi rend="superscript">viz</hi> the substitution of the Annuity of the principal sum :- of <hi rend="superscript">the</hi> £60,000, £50,000, £40,000 <hi rend="underline">a year</hi> <unclear>felas</unclear> the case may be, to the million <hi rend="underline">once paid</hi>. The calculation for which provision <hi rend="underline">is already</hi> made by the Act (32 G.3.c.55.B.) I mean the calculation for the allowance to be made for a <unclear>mafo</unclear> of temporary annuities, in <hi rend="underline">Long</hi>, <hi rend="underline">Short</hi> or <hi rend="underline">Life</hi> annuities is extremely <hi rend="underline">complicated</hi>.<hi rend="superscript">(b)</hi>
8. <hi rend="underline">Inconsistency</hi>, as compared with the <hi rend="underline">New</hi> Sinking Fund :- <hi rend="underline">Fiction</hi> <hi rend="underline">complication</hi> and <hi rend="underline">obscurity</hi>. N.B. Nothing can be more simple than the calculation requisite for the proposed substitution :- <hi rend="superscript">viz</hi> the substitution of the Annuity of the principal sum :- of <hi rend="superscript">the</hi> £60,000, £50,000, £40,000 <hi rend="underline">a year</hi> <unclear>felas</unclear> the case may be, to the million <hi rend="underline">once paid</hi>. The calculation for which provision <hi rend="underline">is already</hi> made by the Act (32 G.3.c.55.B.) I mean the calculation for the allowance to be made for a <unclear>mafo</unclear> of temporary annuities, in <hi rend="underline">Long</hi>, <hi rend="underline">Short</hi> or <hi rend="underline">Life</hi> annuities is extremely <hi rend="underline">complicated</hi>.<hi rend="superscript">(b)</hi>

Revision as of 16:49, 20 July 2022

Click Here To Edit

III. Inappretiable inconveniences; but of a kind commonly adduced in argument.-

6. Finances, exhibited as so much worse than they are, by the addition made to the Loan - people, less in heard be.

7. The War represented as by so much more expensive that it is :- administration, the less popular: people, the les contented. What if the New Sinking Fund had been fed in the same way? the apparent load would have been apparently intolerable. (Per Contra the apparent amplitude of the Old Sinking-Fund would be so much the les upon the proposed plan :- unles explained; for which a line or two in a preamble would suffice.

8. Inconsistency, as compared with the New Sinking Fund :- Fiction complication and obscurity. N.B. Nothing can be more simple than the calculation requisite for the proposed substitution :- viz the substitution of the Annuity of the principal sum :- of the £60,000, £50,000, £40,000 a year felas the case may be, to the million once paid. The calculation for which provision is already made by the Act (32 G.3.c.55.B.) I mean the calculation for the allowance to be made for a mafo of temporary annuities, in Long, Short or Life annuities is extremely complicated.(b)

The unprecedented clearness of the Financial picture is among the characteristic glories of the present administration: should any thing be left that can obscure it?

(b) From the farm thus given to the allowance made to the original or Peace Sinking Fund, the allowance to the War Sinking Fund receives in an individed way an increase: because, as the money raised in each War Year, to produce the allotment to the original Sinking Fund for that year




Identifier: | JB/003/080/002"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 3.

Date_1

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

003

Main Headings

annuity notes

Folio number

080

Info in main headings field

Image

002

Titles

Category

copy/fair copy sheet

Number of Pages

4

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

f5 / f6 / f7 /

Penner

Watermarks

1798 am

Marginals

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

1798

Notes public

"spoilt"

ID Number

1490

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in