JB/058/282/001: Difference between revisions

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/058/282/001: Difference between revisions

Kdownunder (talk | contribs)
m Protected "JB/058/282/001": ready for review ([Edit=Allow only administrators] (indefinite) [Move=Allow only administrators] (indefinite))
Kdownunder (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 2: Line 2:
'''[{{fullurl:JB/058/282/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
'''[{{fullurl:JB/058/282/001|action=edit}} Click Here To Edit]'''
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- ENTER TRANSCRIPTION BELOW THIS LINE -->
 
<p><!-- pencil -->12 June 1805<lb/>
''This Page Has Not Been Transcribed Yet''
<head>Evidence</head></p>
 
<p>Delay is a cluster of evils in one word.  So long as it<lb/>
 
subsists <add>continues</add>, the general end remains unattained:  the arrangements <add>made</add><lb/>
 
predictions <add>delivered</add>, engagements taken, on the behalf <add>on the subject</add> in question by the<lb/>
article of substantive law in question, continue unfulfilled:  the<lb/>
particular end or ends whatever <add>whichever</add> they be that on the occasion<lb/>
in question <del><gap/></del> <add>correspond to the arrangements, predictions, engagements in question, and</add> should have been fulfilled, <del><gap/></del> administration<lb/>
of punishment <add>for delinquency</add>, administration of satisfaction for injury, collation of rights – conversion by the Judge, of the inchoate right in<lb/>
question into the correspondent consummate one – continue unfulfilled.</p>
<p>Mean time the two dark <add>Stygian</add> currents – vexation and expence,<lb/>
keep running on:  vexation, on the part of this or that<lb/>
sort of person, the demandant at any rate, certainly:  expence, naturally<lb/>
and probably:  certainly <del>of</del> unless the whole space of time<lb/>
occupied by the delay in question be purely void <add>a pure blank</add>:  no incidents<lb/>
<gap/> of expence having taken place in the course of it.</p>
<p><head>Note ( ) to p.2. continued</head></p>
<p><del>Were this to be</del> In proof of the propriety and unvexatiousness of such personal<lb/>
attendance, were <del>this</del> <add>an</add> argument to that effect presented to an English<lb/>
Judge, what answer would he have to make?  <del>I have the honour</del> The<lb/>
class of man to which I have the honour to belong is a class of men who<lb/>
<del>mean nothing of</del> <add>only now and then mean</add> what they say, and to whose word it is never prudent<lb/>
to give evidence.  The paper was <del><gap/></del> signed by me it is true, but like<lb/>
so many other papers which I am in the habit of signing, like so many other<lb/>
assertions which I am in the habit of making <unclear>mean</unclear> by <add>solemn</add> signature it us all a <add>a <unclear>lesson</unclear> of</add><lb/>
falshood from beginning to end.  The King knew nothing of <add>about</add> the matter – I myself<lb/>
knew as little:  were the Defendant to come to me (in Court or out of court<lb/>
at that time or at another) I should refuse to hear him:  were he not to come<lb/>
he would not suffer the penalty of £100 or any other specific penalty:  he would<lb/>
be vexed <add>and pillaged</add> in an inexplicable variety of other ways.  What I meant he should<lb/>
do ws to employ an Attorney, that the business might come before me, through<lb/>
the medium of my learned friends in a regular way, <del><gap/> <gap/></del> a fact which<lb/>
any may may easily satisfy himself about, when once he has sufficient to understand<lb/>
that my brethren and I are <gap/> not fit to be believed.  Therefore let the Attorney<lb/>
come instead of the Client:  not that the Attorney himself <del>would</del> were he to attend<lb/>
at the time and place at which I have thus commanded attendance to be paid,<lb/>
would be <del>suffered</del> spoken to or suffered to speak any more than his client.</p>
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
<!-- DO NOT EDIT BELOW THIS LINE -->
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Untranscribed}}
{{Metadata:{{PAGENAME}}}}{{Ready_For_Review}}

Revision as of 04:38, 21 July 2022

Click Here To Edit

12 June 1805
Evidence

Delay is a cluster of evils in one word. So long as it
subsists continues, the general end remains unattained: the arrangements made
predictions delivered, engagements taken, on the behalf on the subject in question by the
article of substantive law in question, continue unfulfilled: the
particular end or ends whatever whichever they be that on the occasion
in question correspond to the arrangements, predictions, engagements in question, and should have been fulfilled, administration
of punishment for delinquency, administration of satisfaction for injury, collation of rights – conversion by the Judge, of the inchoate right in
question into the correspondent consummate one – continue unfulfilled.

Mean time the two dark Stygian currents – vexation and expence,
keep running on: vexation, on the part of this or that
sort of person, the demandant at any rate, certainly: expence, naturally
and probably: certainly of unless the whole space of time
occupied by the delay in question be purely void a pure blank: no incidents
of expence having taken place in the course of it.

Note ( ) to p.2. continued

Were this to be In proof of the propriety and unvexatiousness of such personal
attendance, were this an argument to that effect presented to an English
Judge, what answer would he have to make? I have the honour The
class of man to which I have the honour to belong is a class of men who
mean nothing of only now and then mean what they say, and to whose word it is never prudent
to give evidence. The paper was signed by me it is true, but like
so many other papers which I am in the habit of signing, like so many other
assertions which I am in the habit of making mean by solemn signature it us all a a lesson of
falshood from beginning to end. The King knew nothing of about the matter – I myself
knew as little: were the Defendant to come to me (in Court or out of court
at that time or at another) I should refuse to hear him: were he not to come
he would not suffer the penalty of £100 or any other specific penalty: he would
be vexed and pillaged in an inexplicable variety of other ways. What I meant he should
do ws to employ an Attorney, that the business might come before me, through
the medium of my learned friends in a regular way, a fact which
any may may easily satisfy himself about, when once he has sufficient to understand
that my brethren and I are not fit to be believed. Therefore let the Attorney
come instead of the Client: not that the Attorney himself would were he to attend
at the time and place at which I have thus commanded attendance to be paid,
would be suffered spoken to or suffered to speak any more than his client.


Identifier: | JB/058/282/001"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 58.

Date_1

1805-06-12

Marginal Summary Numbering

a continued

Box

058

Main Headings

evidence

Folio number

282

Info in main headings field

evidence

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

c2 / e5

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

1800

Marginals

jeremy bentham

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

1800

Notes public

ID Number

18951

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk
  • Create account
  • Log in